Recommended Posts

Please, every Windows 8 hater - read this carefully. I'm not justifying anything, I just think my input may help you realize the beauty of this change.

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Metro for desktop computers

I don't see how Metro is not good for desktops actually - please help me understand. I've read most complaints entirely, and I still don't understand. You move your mouse to the lower-left screen, and voila - there's your start menu.

Finding apps has never been easier - do a search while in the Metro menu.

Don't want Windows 8 to start up in Metro? Turn it off. I like when my PC starts up in Metro, because then my PC isn't spending 99% of its resources on launching all kinds of apps in the background, when I know exactly what I want.

For instance, if I want to start Visual Studio to do programming as the first thing I do, I click my pinned Visual Studio icon on the Metro screen. It takes me to the desktop, and starts loading the application - even with full priority (allowing it to be priored over all the other program processes while it starts up).

I get the idea that people want some kind of "Default" state that their PC is in, but really, I believe people have become way too used to the old "inside the box"-way of thinking. Let's face it. You start up your PC anyway, and you always start out by launching 1 single app to do your primary purpose, isn't that right? You never start out by launching 20 apps at a time. These will be started automatically for you.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Normal applications will be offered through the marketplace as well as Metro apps, so the app-store is still going to be awesome.

Why Metro as it is now?

As a developer, I see clearly what Microsoft is doing here. The following is based on knowledge within the field, and common sense. However, some of it is based on beliefs and assumptions.

  • Microsoft will make Windows Phone 7 apps compatible with Windows 8. When these apps run, they will run in the docked mode (left or right) always for compatibility reasons, since that'll match the proper phone aspect ratio.
  • Windows 8 apps that are compatible with the docked (left or right) app format will run in that mode always when running in Windows Phone 8.

Scaling is no problem, since Silverlight (or WPF for that matter) is resolution independent, and uses vector graphics. Hence a much higher compatibility with larger screens.

I will keep this post updated with new points of view as replies arrive - please read the post carefully before you reply!

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Win+C is much more efficient and specifically designed to pull up the "C"harms. I restart/shutdown using Win+C every time and it's second nature now, was after 10 minutes.

You make good points and some that don't really matter at all - this is a preview and things will change between now and a potential RC build as well as the RTM which should be this year at some point. They have a long way to go.

Best thing I can say: people need to get over the whole Metro thing, really. It's there, use it, don't use it. I can sit here and use my machine for hours and hours and hours and never once see the Start screen at all - not one time. I start up the apps I normally keep open by their Taskbar buttons/shortcuts and that's it - I have no reason to see the Start screen and on the very rare times that I hit just the Windows key itself I type what I'm looking for and hit Enter so fast it's a non-issue, that means the Start screen is irrelevant in the big picture for those of us that continue to use Desktop "mode" since Metro apps are so few and useful at this point.

People don't like change, but they adapt in time.

  • Like 2

Win+C is much more efficient and specifically designed to pull up the "C"harms. I restart/shutdown using Win+C every time and it's second nature now, was after 10 minutes.

Win+I requires one less click to shut down compared to Win+C.

...every Windows 8 hater...

I stopped reading, and and taking this opinion seriously, here. Disliking one feature in a desktop environment doesn't mean people hate the whole OS and you'd know that if you actually read what people were saying, so given your opening and request that people read your post before replying, I'd say that qualifies you as a hypocrite. Good Day.

  • Like 7

Oh boy.

Please, every Windows 8 hater - read this carefully. I'm not justifying anything, I just think my input may help you realize the beauty of this change.

Haytazzz!

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

I'm glad for you. But how is you liking it proving anything?

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Notifications are awful as they're too easy to miss. Look at same thing in upcoming OS X or how it's been for a few years in Ubuntu -- there are notification counters and you can see what you've missed. And "theoretically," they don't replace progress bars as they're not visible at all times (but not much is anyway in Metro).

Metro for desktop computers

I don't see how Metro is not good for desktops actually - please help me understand. I've read most complaints entirely, and I still don't understand. You move your mouse to the lower-left screen, and voila - there's your start menu.

And I just click the start menu, and, voila, there's my start menu. Actually, what you've mentioned is exactly one of the things that's wrong -- everything's hidden. From the clock to any taskbar indicator. Everything.

Finding apps has never been easier - do a search while in the Metro menu.

...or in the start menu. Plus you can still view your open app, no need to change views, like you have to to achieve anything in Metro!

Don't want Windows 8 to start up in Metro? Turn it off. I like when my PC starts up in Metro, because then my PC isn't spending 99% of its resources on launching all kinds of apps in the background, when I know exactly what I want.

You can't turn it off, at least not by a Microsoft sanctioned way. Btw, Metro still loads the desktop, so your argument's invalid.

For instance, if I want to start Visual Studio to do programming as the first thing I do, I click my pinned Visual Studio icon on the Metro screen. It takes me to the desktop, and starts loading the application - even with full priority (allowing it to be priored over all the other program processes while it starts up).

Not sure what this is supposed to mean? I can also click on an icon in the superbar, plus I don't have to confused by a gazillion animated tiles.

I get the idea that people want some kind of "Default" state that their PC is in, but really, I believe people have become way too used to the old "inside the box"-way of thinking. Let's face it. You start up your PC anyway, and you always start out by launching 1 single app to do your primary purpose, isn't that right? You never start out by launching 20 apps at a time. These will be started automatically for you.

Purely subjective, but I start the browser, email client, twitter app and possibly the music player the moment I sit in front of my computer. Later I add the programs I work in.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

Yes, it is.

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

Haha, are you high? "They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries." Yeah, that pesky shut down button has been a rock in our shoes for centuries.

Second part I'll post later as there are too many quote tags to fit in one post.

  • Like 2

Second part.

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Haha, I never used this shortcut.

Normal applications will be offered through the marketplace as well as Metro apps, so the app-store is still going to be awesome.

Could agree with this, except it looks like crap.

Why Metro as it is now?

As a developer, I see clearly what Microsoft is doing here. The following is based on knowledge within the field, and common sense. However, some of it is based on beliefs and assumptions.

Microsoft will make Windows Phone 7 apps compatible with Windows 8. When these apps run, they will run in the docked mode (left or right) always for compatibility reasons, since that'll match the proper phone aspect ratio.

Windows 8 apps that are compatible with the docked (left or right) app format will run in that mode always when running in Windows Phone 8.

Scaling is no problem, since Silverlight (or WPF for that matter) is resolution independent, and uses vector graphics. Hence a much higher compatibility with larger screens.

Okay, have nothing to say about this one.

I will keep this post updated with new points of view as replies arrive - please read the post carefully before you reply!

Can't wait!

Yeah, I was bored.

snip

If you buy me a copy of Windows 8 when it is released then I will use metro. Until then, please don't tell me what to do.

Also, we're supposed to take your opinion as fact and just agree with you? Well I see the light now! The metro start screen is the super duper!

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Oh, you mean like Growl? Cool!

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

For the past 17 years, what have the masses been groomed to do?

A: The power button is off limits and that they should shut down through Windows. So that's what they think they're going to have to do with Windows 8.

Win+I requires one less click to shut down compared to Win+C.

Perhaps, but with Win+C I can do that with two fingers in a split second whereas even my large hand and fairly wide finger-reach can't do Win+I with the left hand - and that means you're using two hands to get Win+I so...

Win+C is still more efficient overall. ;)

Perhaps, but with Win+C I can do that with two fingers in a split second whereas even my large hand and fairly wide finger-reach can't do Win+I with the left hand - and that means you're using two hands to get Win+I so... Win+C is still more efficient overall. ;)

You either have tiny little girl hands, or a gigantic keyboard. :huh:

I stopped reading, and and taking this opinion seriously, here. Disliking one feature in a desktop environment doesn't mean people hate the whole OS and you'd know that if you actually read what people were saying, so given your opening and request that people read your post before replying, I'd say that qualifies you as a hypocrite. Good Day.

Did I ever state that? I realize my statement might have been harsh, but I had no bad intentions regarding this statement at all. I'm sorry if it came out that way. A guy that hates or doesn't like Windows 8 is a Windows hater, although the word "hater" might sound offensive. I should have used the term "Critics" instead probably. If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it. I didn't mean to say that you hate in general, but just that you hate Windows 8 or parts of it.

Did I ever state that? I realize my statement might have been harsh, but I had no bad intentions regarding this statement at all. I'm sorry if it came out that way. A guy that hates or doesn't like Windows 8 is a Windows hater, although the word "hater" might sound offensive. I should have used the term "Critics" instead probably. If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it. I didn't mean to say that you hate in general, but just that you hate Windows 8 or parts of it.

so the only way to like a product is to be it's fanboy?

If you buy me a copy of Windows 8 when it is released then I will use metro. Until then, please don't tell me what to do.

Also, we're supposed to take your opinion as fact and just agree with you? Well I see the light now! The metro start screen is the super duper!

It's funny how people react to a simple opinion. I was basically just trying to state my part of the whole experience, and perhaps help you understand a few things you might have missed. I'm no consultant, nor an expert within the field, and I can certainly not know what your opinions are, or what you're thinking. This whole post was just made because I don't understand your points, and I basically just shared a few experiences I made for myself to clear some confusions up in regards to Metro.

That's why I lead up to a discussion. It'd be great to keep hearing your criticism, and to figure out the pros and cons of Windows 8 constructively.

And no, I'm not saying that my opinion is a fact - that's entirely up to you. I just made my opinion, and you can choose wether or not to pay attention to it. You're a human, and you're acting like a child. If a guy tells you that he believes in God, it doesn't mean you have to as well. Be cool.

You either have tiny little girl hands, or a gigantic keyboard. :huh:

While it is possible to do Win+I with just the left hand, if I wanted to stress the muscles in the left hand with such a move it wouldn't take long to create some form of RSI doing it whereas Win+C is pretty much a bare twitch of the left thumb and index finger since my left thumb is resting on the very left edge of the Space bar pretty much constantly in my normal daily usage:

wincwini.jpg

Win+I for anyone with just the left hand is a stretch for anyone, pun very much intended. :)

It's basically the same on a full size desktop keyboard as well, actually slightly longer on the reach by about 1/2" (using a standard Dell USB desktop keyboard for comparison).

Still easier to do Win+C...

It's funny how people react to a simple opinion. I was basically just trying to state my part of the whole experience, and perhaps help you understand a few things you might have missed. I'm no consultant, nor an expert within the field, and I can certainly not know what your opinions are, or what you're thinking. This whole post was just made because I don't understand your points, and I basically just shared a few experiences I made for myself to clear some confusions up in regards to Metro.

That's why I lead up to a discussion. It'd be great to keep hearing your criticism, and to figure out the pros and cons of Windows 8 constructively.

And no, I'm not saying that my opinion is a fact - that's entirely up to you. I just made my opinion, and you can choose wether or not to pay attention to it. You're a human, and you're acting like a child. If a guy tells you that he believes in God, it doesn't mean you have to as well. Be cool.

And the people on the other side of the fence don't understand how anyone can like it in it's current form. As it stands now, I can do everything the metro start screen does more easily in Windows 7. Be more efficient, more organized, the entire thing. Metro start screen is a pointless addition for a desktop pc.

Why do I need to relearn how to use my computer just to do the things I do now... only different?

  • Like 2

from the latest entry on the B8 blog about Metro IE10, I thought this was interestingly worded:

Snap makes it easy to use Windows 8 for more than one thing at a time.

As a user in the comment section points out:

Has that actually been hard in the last two decades?

Haytazzz!

Yeah, sorry for that.

I'm glad for you. But how is you liking it proving anything?

Not at all. I was just hoping that (in some scenarios) my points of view had not been seen by you - and that they might have been a reasonable explanation to the design choices behind Metro.

Notifications are awful as they're too easy to miss. Look at same thing in upcoming OS X or how it's been for a few years in Ubuntu -- there are notification counters and you can see what you've missed. And "theoretically," they don't replace progress bars as they're not visible at all times (but not much is anyway in Metro).

The notifications will stay as long as you don't move your mouse or your keyboard. In other words, when you're at your computer. Future computers (including desktops) will have approximity sensors, allowing the PC to detect your presence as well. Windows 8 supports this natively. There's an old post full of leaks from years back which still holds so far. More specifically, this part may be interesting to you.

And I just click the start menu, and, voila, there's my start menu. Actually, what you've mentioned is exactly one of the things that's wrong -- everything's hidden. From the clock to any taskbar indicator. Everything.

I understand this criticism entirely. Showing the clock might prove a good thing, or getting a status of something while in Metro. I don't know why I didn't think of that before. It's not something I've noticed though, since my usage of Metro apps are often in and out, just like on Windows Phone. You get the basic information through tiles, and once there's more you'd like to catch up on, you quickly go in, and back out again. That doesn't justify anything though, and I agree.

On Windows Phone, when you swipe your finger from the top of the screen to the bottom, a task-bar fades in, showing battery status, connection status and the time. Perhaps that'll be the same for Windows 8?

...or in the start menu. Plus you can still view your open app, no need to change views, like you have to to achieve anything in Metro!

See, this is quite interesting. I was thinking the exact same thing the other day, until a Neowin member commented "how often do you actually use the Windows 7 start menu?". I quickly realized that most of my stuff is pinned to the taskbar anyway, and when I want to find specific information, I never browse through a list - searching just makes more sense.

As for the full-screen interface, it is not at all needed. Using the charm bar's "search" button will allow searching while on the desktop, or using the Windows + W, Windows + Q or Windows + F hotkeys for the different search categories respectively.

You can't turn it off, at least not by a Microsoft sanctioned way. Btw, Metro still loads the desktop, so your argument's invalid.

Metro only loads the desktop with really low priority. This has already been mentioned in a news post (I think it was even on Neowin), and on the Windows 8 blog (Engineering Windows 8). However, the heavy loading only occurs once you make a desktop-based activity. This is made to decrease load especially on tablets and phones. Combined with hybrid-boot tech, it does this quite well.

As it is right now, there's an application inbuilt in Windows 8 called "Show desktop". It's an EXE hidden in the system. Putting it as automatic startup with the system causes Metro to disable during boot. There's been rumors that this will be an option later. There are also security policy settings that can be disabled/enabled to achieve the same effect. Not very user-friendly and intuitive, I know.

Not sure what this is supposed to mean? I can also click on an icon in the superbar, plus I don't have to confused by a gazillion animated tiles.

Yes, but you can't do it as efficiently, because your PC will most likely be busy booting up other programs, while you (most likely) just want to load one thing with full priority. Metro gives you that control. Also, the Metro interface can show way more tiles, and by differentiating things in color, named categories and custom positions, I doubt you'll be confused by your own setup. Microsoft elaborated on their decissions on this here, showing scientific results through heatmaps that describe how the average user doesn't even use the Windows 7 start menu optimally (focus on the images in the post if you're a TL;DR guy :) ).

Purely subjective, but I start the browser, email client, twitter app and possibly the music player the moment I sit in front of my computer. Later I add the programs I work in.

Interesting. I take it back then! :) One could however argue that it would probably be wise for you to configure those to start up automatically.

Yes, it is.

Through the usual ways (as I also state), yes. Could you elaborate a bit more?

Haha, are you high? "They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries." Yeah, that pesky shut down button has been a rock in our shoes for centuries.

No, not last time I checked :laugh: . What I mean by noise is elements that aren't needed for the functionality to still be there.

While it is possible to do Win+I with just the left hand, if I wanted to stress the muscles in the left hand with such a move it wouldn't take long to create some form of RSI doing it whereas Win+C is pretty much a bare twitch of the left thumb and index finger since my left thumb is resting on the very left edge of the Space bar pretty much constantly in my normal daily usage:

wincwini.jpg

Win+I for anyone with just the left hand is a stretch for anyone, pun very much intended. :)

It's basically the same on a full size desktop keyboard as well, actually slightly longer on the reach by about 1/2" (using a standard Dell USB desktop keyboard for comparison).

Still easier to do Win+C...

Couldn't resist. When a touch interface encourages you to touch your keyboard, often, it may be implemented improperly ... lol.

If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it.

No, I disagree. If I see a car that has ugly wheels, I don't hate the car - I hate the wheels.

The same with Windows 8. I don't hate it. I might dislike a feature in it, but a feature doesn't make it the whole.

from the latest entry on the B8 blog about Metro IE10 ...

Snapping in Windows 8 is different. You can snap the "desktop box", and you can snap Windows 8 apps in the side at the same time, in an entire isolated environment outside the box. Here's a screenshot I just made demonstrating it, and here's the same concept just with the desktop-box in collapsed-mode. IE10 in Metro mode can snap like this too.

And the people on the other side of the fence don't understand how anyone can like it in it's current form. As it stands now, I can do everything the metro start screen does more easily in Windows 7. Be more efficient, more organized, the entire thing. Metro start screen is a pointless addition for a desktop pc.

Why do I need to relearn how to use my computer just to do the things I do now... only different?

Could you be more specific? I'm curious, and I'm not trying to be a tease. Sorry if I am. What (more specifically) do you do faster on your Windows 7 machine?

Sounds like BS Microsoft marketers at work to me.

You sound like a troll to me with no constructive comments what so ever.

No, I disagree. If I see a car that has ugly wheels, I don't hate the car - I hate the wheels.

The same with Windows 8. I don't hate it. I might dislike a feature in it, but a feature doesn't make it the whole.

Point taken, I get you. I take it back. I appologize. :)

so the only way to like a product is to be it's fanboy?

Surprisingly enough, I wouldn't call myself a Microsoft fanboy. I objectively use what I like the most. I use Microsoft Word instead of OpenOffice because of formatting issues with Microsoft OOML or whatever it's called, which is used almost everywhere. I use Google Docs instead of Office Live because it's just better when it comes to collaboration.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!