Recommended Posts

Welcome to Neowin' official PC Hardware buying guide. For those who don't have time to keep track of the latest news and don't want to go through the hassle of reviewing every new product that comes out, we have build a comprehensive guide, specifically for you. You can trust this guide with all your money. We have developed it, taking into consideration, all the reviews from various technology sites, throughout the internet.

Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming

Intel Pentium G860 ? LGA1155 - $74.99

GIGABYTE GA-H61M-DS2 - $49.99 or Asus H61-M LE LGA1155 - $59.99

AMD Radeon 6670 1024MB DDR3 1280x800 to 1440x900 - $54.99 or AMD Radeon 7750 1024MB GDDR5 1600x900 - $99.99

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45

Antec BP430 430W - $48.80 or Xigmatek NRP-PC 402 400W - $5742

With components on the left: 253 USD

With components on the right: 317 USD

Budget - For Gaming

Intel Core i3-3220 - LGA1155 - $124.99

ASRock B75M-ITX LGA 1155 - $89.99

NVIDIA GeForce 7750 1680x1050 - $79.99 or AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45 or G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

With components on the left: 391 USD

With components on the right: 463 USD

Budget - For Multi-threaded apps, and casual gaming

AMD FX 4100 - $108.99

GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3 - $94.24

AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

465 USD

Mainstream

Intel Core-i5 3470 ? LGA1155 - $179.99

ASRock Z68 Extreme4Gen3 LGA1155 - $132.99

AMD Radeon HD 7850 1 GB 1680x1050 to 1920x1080 - $228.99

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

OCZ Agility 3 AGT3-25SAT3-120G 120GB - $117.99

CORSAIR Builder Series CX600 V2 600W - $72.99

780 USD

High End

Intel Core i7 3770K - LGA1155 - $309.99

GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UP5-TH LGA 1155 - $244.99

AMD Radeon HD 7970 Boost - $379

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 256GB - $179.99

CORSAIR Enthusiast Series TX650 V2 650W - $79.99

1242 USD

Extreme Performance

Intel Core i7 3930K - LGA2011 - $569.99

ASUS P9X79 PRO LGA 2011 - $309.99

2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 SuperClocked in SLI 2560x1600 - $878.99

CORSAIR DOMINATOR 16GB (4 x 4GB) 1866 MHz - $119.99

Crucial M4 CT512M4SSD1 512GB - $384.99

CORSAIR TX750 V2 850W - $104.99

2369 USD

Edited by Anaron
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1070547-pc-hardware-buying-guide-q1-2013/
Share on other sites

Not everyday. Not necessarily

Once in a month only :p

More like once a week, at least. Every week at least 1 thing better than what is posted comes out. Thats why threads like this cannot exist. The PC building industry is too fast.

Another thing, all your parts are from Newegg. There are better and cheaper parts than from Newegg. Besides that, Newegg does not ship everywhere.

for "Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming" a celeron g530/40 offers pretty good performance for about 40euros.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_5.html#sect0

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_6.html#sect0

h61 chipset is ok for ultra low budget but rather then the 2nd listed Asus H61-M LE, an extra $9 with the Asrock H67 board brings more features like hdmi, usb3, 2 x SATA 6Gb/s, optical out

The Extreme Build is odd 32GB RAM, SLI/Crossfire and a large RAID 0 for storage of games would make more sense. Why a 512GB SSD? SSDs arent exactly THAT cheap yet.

pretty sure an SSD will outperform a RAID 0 easily. Don't need 512 gigs of it though.

and 32 gigs is overkill when most games can't use a fraction of that.

surprised no AMD APU A-series get in the list specially in the budget area. They sound good to me, future proof cheap to buy and run, and gonna save you the GPU!!!

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

On paper:

G850

Dual Core

2.9 GHz

2 x 256KB L2 Cache

3MB L3 Cache

Intregated Intel HD Graphics 2000

A6-3670K

Quad Core

2.7 GHz

4MB L2 Cache

Integrated AMD Radeon HD 6530D

G850 has an L3 Cache and is clocked higher. However, the APU is a quad core (better for non-gaming tasks, and some games such as GTA4 which require a quad core to run smoothly.) and it has a better integrated GPU.

First of all, here are the pass marks cores:

G850 2731 Rank 308th

A6-3670K 3861 Rank 180th

The APU here wins in the Pass Mark benchmark by 1130 points. It is also a higher ranking than the G850.

However, I cannot find any benchmarks for the A8-3670K :(. So I am going to bump it up to the top of the range (next dearest one) A8-3870K ?101.99 and compare it against the similarly priced Intel Core i3-2120. ?94.79

Intregated Graphics

metro.png

A8-3870 is nearly double the fps, when using integrated graphics.

(The other benchmarks were a pretty similar result from that website.)

(2100 is used in below benchmarks, because the 2120 isnt used...)

Other Benchmarks

heaven-580-90.jpg

In this benchmark, the A8 gains 11FPS more than the i3 2100, along with a 560TI.

With cinebench:

A8-3870K 3.46 Points

i3-2100 3.00 Points

With WPrime:

14.350 A8-3870K

18.090 i3-2100

Lower is better

The overall score for multitasking

i3-2100 1476

A8-3870K 1082

However, overclocking (which is relatively easy) brings it to a more respectable 1264.

Plus, since there is more cores availble, multithreaded apps will gain an advantage.

GAMING BENCHMARKS http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2012/02/06/amd-a8-3870-review/6(Internal GPU)

Crossfiring, the APU with a cheap 6670 is where this APU gains an advantage over the i3. This is a lot cheaper (the motherboards are also cheaper). I am going to post benchmarks, but this is getting to be a very long thread, so Im going to leave it as it is at the moment.

Bout time someone made a topic like this.

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

Recommendation from Tom?s Hardware is to go Intel.

Averages.png

I would compare the G860 to the G850 and the A6-3670K to the A8-3870K.

Also, all these builds have dedicated graphics, so the performance of integrated graphics is moot.

EDIT: Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

  • Like 1

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

I was thinking about it, but since everyone have their own taste, so it might not interest all.

Regardless, I will try to add some decent recommendations, in the update.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

I initially thought of adding a 350/360 one, but couldn't found an M4 variant of it. As this is what we call the ultimate power house, so we'd expect top of the line performance, and according to benchmarks of AnandTech, M4 tops the charts.

I'll see if I can find a cheaper one next time.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

Here, too, I thought of adding HDDs. I will add them in the update.

Now I feel like my post was a little bossy. :p

You did a good job though; lord knows I don?t have the patience to come up with a whole bunch of builds.

Fake edit: you?ll also need a fan/heatsink in the LGA2011, Intel doesn?t include a stock cooler with those CPUs.

It all depends what you want. The APU's are good for budget gaming, as they have the nicer integrated GPU. I think you should have left side be Intel, and right side be AMD CPU's (except after High End - where AMD just gets destroyed).

snapback.pngSite Lab, on 16 April 2012 - 16:32, said:

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Heehee, I have to put AMD into the argument. A good idea, would be like tsupersonic said is left hand side Intel, right hand side AMD. Then have an APU build. Therefore if someone wants an APU they can see the best option for that, and if someone wants to go AMD then they can as well. You could also do with a UK prices bit. (Newegg + Aria (www.aria.co.uk) is a good one.)

and for budget builds, AMD is better bang for you buck...

No, no no we cannot be having this. The dual core i3 obviously beats all of the quad/hexa/eight core processors :p. It is also so much cheaper (even though the motherboards are more expenisve). *sarcasam*

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This is what I want. Hey Gemini, how do I remove you from all my google products permanently?
    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!