Recommended Posts

Welcome to Neowin' official PC Hardware buying guide. For those who don't have time to keep track of the latest news and don't want to go through the hassle of reviewing every new product that comes out, we have build a comprehensive guide, specifically for you. You can trust this guide with all your money. We have developed it, taking into consideration, all the reviews from various technology sites, throughout the internet.

Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming

Intel Pentium G860 ? LGA1155 - $74.99

GIGABYTE GA-H61M-DS2 - $49.99 or Asus H61-M LE LGA1155 - $59.99

AMD Radeon 6670 1024MB DDR3 1280x800 to 1440x900 - $54.99 or AMD Radeon 7750 1024MB GDDR5 1600x900 - $99.99

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45

Antec BP430 430W - $48.80 or Xigmatek NRP-PC 402 400W - $5742

With components on the left: 253 USD

With components on the right: 317 USD

Budget - For Gaming

Intel Core i3-3220 - LGA1155 - $124.99

ASRock B75M-ITX LGA 1155 - $89.99

NVIDIA GeForce 7750 1680x1050 - $79.99 or AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45 or G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

With components on the left: 391 USD

With components on the right: 463 USD

Budget - For Multi-threaded apps, and casual gaming

AMD FX 4100 - $108.99

GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3 - $94.24

AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

465 USD

Mainstream

Intel Core-i5 3470 ? LGA1155 - $179.99

ASRock Z68 Extreme4Gen3 LGA1155 - $132.99

AMD Radeon HD 7850 1 GB 1680x1050 to 1920x1080 - $228.99

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

OCZ Agility 3 AGT3-25SAT3-120G 120GB - $117.99

CORSAIR Builder Series CX600 V2 600W - $72.99

780 USD

High End

Intel Core i7 3770K - LGA1155 - $309.99

GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UP5-TH LGA 1155 - $244.99

AMD Radeon HD 7970 Boost - $379

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 256GB - $179.99

CORSAIR Enthusiast Series TX650 V2 650W - $79.99

1242 USD

Extreme Performance

Intel Core i7 3930K - LGA2011 - $569.99

ASUS P9X79 PRO LGA 2011 - $309.99

2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 SuperClocked in SLI 2560x1600 - $878.99

CORSAIR DOMINATOR 16GB (4 x 4GB) 1866 MHz - $119.99

Crucial M4 CT512M4SSD1 512GB - $384.99

CORSAIR TX750 V2 850W - $104.99

2369 USD

Edited by Anaron
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1070547-pc-hardware-buying-guide-q1-2013/
Share on other sites

Not everyday. Not necessarily

Once in a month only :p

More like once a week, at least. Every week at least 1 thing better than what is posted comes out. Thats why threads like this cannot exist. The PC building industry is too fast.

Another thing, all your parts are from Newegg. There are better and cheaper parts than from Newegg. Besides that, Newegg does not ship everywhere.

for "Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming" a celeron g530/40 offers pretty good performance for about 40euros.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_5.html#sect0

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_6.html#sect0

h61 chipset is ok for ultra low budget but rather then the 2nd listed Asus H61-M LE, an extra $9 with the Asrock H67 board brings more features like hdmi, usb3, 2 x SATA 6Gb/s, optical out

The Extreme Build is odd 32GB RAM, SLI/Crossfire and a large RAID 0 for storage of games would make more sense. Why a 512GB SSD? SSDs arent exactly THAT cheap yet.

pretty sure an SSD will outperform a RAID 0 easily. Don't need 512 gigs of it though.

and 32 gigs is overkill when most games can't use a fraction of that.

surprised no AMD APU A-series get in the list specially in the budget area. They sound good to me, future proof cheap to buy and run, and gonna save you the GPU!!!

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

On paper:

G850

Dual Core

2.9 GHz

2 x 256KB L2 Cache

3MB L3 Cache

Intregated Intel HD Graphics 2000

A6-3670K

Quad Core

2.7 GHz

4MB L2 Cache

Integrated AMD Radeon HD 6530D

G850 has an L3 Cache and is clocked higher. However, the APU is a quad core (better for non-gaming tasks, and some games such as GTA4 which require a quad core to run smoothly.) and it has a better integrated GPU.

First of all, here are the pass marks cores:

G850 2731 Rank 308th

A6-3670K 3861 Rank 180th

The APU here wins in the Pass Mark benchmark by 1130 points. It is also a higher ranking than the G850.

However, I cannot find any benchmarks for the A8-3670K :(. So I am going to bump it up to the top of the range (next dearest one) A8-3870K ?101.99 and compare it against the similarly priced Intel Core i3-2120. ?94.79

Intregated Graphics

metro.png

A8-3870 is nearly double the fps, when using integrated graphics.

(The other benchmarks were a pretty similar result from that website.)

(2100 is used in below benchmarks, because the 2120 isnt used...)

Other Benchmarks

heaven-580-90.jpg

In this benchmark, the A8 gains 11FPS more than the i3 2100, along with a 560TI.

With cinebench:

A8-3870K 3.46 Points

i3-2100 3.00 Points

With WPrime:

14.350 A8-3870K

18.090 i3-2100

Lower is better

The overall score for multitasking

i3-2100 1476

A8-3870K 1082

However, overclocking (which is relatively easy) brings it to a more respectable 1264.

Plus, since there is more cores availble, multithreaded apps will gain an advantage.

GAMING BENCHMARKS http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2012/02/06/amd-a8-3870-review/6(Internal GPU)

Crossfiring, the APU with a cheap 6670 is where this APU gains an advantage over the i3. This is a lot cheaper (the motherboards are also cheaper). I am going to post benchmarks, but this is getting to be a very long thread, so Im going to leave it as it is at the moment.

Bout time someone made a topic like this.

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

Recommendation from Tom?s Hardware is to go Intel.

Averages.png

I would compare the G860 to the G850 and the A6-3670K to the A8-3870K.

Also, all these builds have dedicated graphics, so the performance of integrated graphics is moot.

EDIT: Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

  • Like 1

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

I was thinking about it, but since everyone have their own taste, so it might not interest all.

Regardless, I will try to add some decent recommendations, in the update.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

I initially thought of adding a 350/360 one, but couldn't found an M4 variant of it. As this is what we call the ultimate power house, so we'd expect top of the line performance, and according to benchmarks of AnandTech, M4 tops the charts.

I'll see if I can find a cheaper one next time.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

Here, too, I thought of adding HDDs. I will add them in the update.

Now I feel like my post was a little bossy. :p

You did a good job though; lord knows I don?t have the patience to come up with a whole bunch of builds.

Fake edit: you?ll also need a fan/heatsink in the LGA2011, Intel doesn?t include a stock cooler with those CPUs.

It all depends what you want. The APU's are good for budget gaming, as they have the nicer integrated GPU. I think you should have left side be Intel, and right side be AMD CPU's (except after High End - where AMD just gets destroyed).

snapback.pngSite Lab, on 16 April 2012 - 16:32, said:

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Heehee, I have to put AMD into the argument. A good idea, would be like tsupersonic said is left hand side Intel, right hand side AMD. Then have an APU build. Therefore if someone wants an APU they can see the best option for that, and if someone wants to go AMD then they can as well. You could also do with a UK prices bit. (Newegg + Aria (www.aria.co.uk) is a good one.)

and for budget builds, AMD is better bang for you buck...

No, no no we cannot be having this. The dual core i3 obviously beats all of the quad/hexa/eight core processors :p. It is also so much cheaper (even though the motherboards are more expenisve). *sarcasam*

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!