Recommended Posts

how exactly are you setting up your pc to pc vpn? You may not be allowing IP traffic across the vpn (as simple as that may sound it isnt that simple). What are you using? As you can imagine there are a million and one different vpn solutions and some are much more configurable than others.

For instance if it were cisco, it would probably be a nat issue. the vpn traffic needs to be taken out of nat or be put into a no nat rule. Also another issue would be if the pc had an interface that has the same ip range as the vpn'd network. Though it could be one of the 15 other rules needed to have a successful tunnel up...that is just one that gets missed.

We dont have the equipment yet per say. Since we have seen that the routers Ive mentioned (NB2500 and NB1600) are working off a OpenWRT base and currently there are no alternatives for the siutation at hand, then we are testing on OpenWRT VMs.......

post up your config, obscure your ip addresses if you want.

here is a write up. sorry it took so long to respond back, was in deep do doo yesterday.

https://forum.openwr....php?pid=145557

something sounds as if it is missing..

here are the instructions, may take a few days to read through to fully understand what is going on.

http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.overview

post up your config, obscure your ip addresses if you want.

here is a write up. sorry it took so long to respond back, was in deep do doo yesterday.

https://forum.openwr....php?pid=145557

something sounds as if it is missing..

here are the instructions, may take a few days to read through to fully understand what is going on.

http://wiki.openwrt....to/vpn.overview

Thanks :)

I wanted to try this with VMs but the other day I accidently touched something in my OpenWRT VM and the DHCP server on it (dnsmasq) overrid the network's DHCP and started to hand out its own IPs so I had to take it off line :(

Anyways I already saw and tried the first link and it is outdated as now opkg is the package manager. Is there any way to download this external and put it on the VM to test it out?

diagram3.png

The yellow dots are equipment I have control over (the switch on the left side problably also)

On the bottom side, with have 2 PCs and a router. Nothing else.

On the top side, with have a already in place router. The right side (crossing the red line) is a office area which I have no access to and the right side should not know about the left side and visaversa. The "problem" is that (initially) I dont have access to that first router. Moving on: On the left side of the top side of that first router, we have a router running OpenWRT (possibly the NB2500) and a switch (again that switch I will problably have access to). Later those are end clients but they are NOT PCs. As a matter of fact, NOTHING on the left side at all will be a PC. They are simply machines. They DO however (if the NB1600 is chosen) have a configuration with OpenWRT.

Also, this is a industrial type setup. Reason why I cant just go with DD-WRT routers and call it a day (I dont think I would even convince my boss and anyways we need something like the NB1600)

Continue on that last line, the main probelm is the NB1600. I need that form factor/type of product for the machine they are attached to.

sc302, thank you for all your help and I hope this hast description helps you out on understanding and giving me a bit more information :)

Thank you!

The router that is hosting vpn needs to be on the edge, not behind another router that is doing nat. this can and will create issues if not done correctly. If you can have your router that you have control of access the outside directly that would be ideal, perhaps in a dmz that is not natted.

Would need to see the config one way or the other to try and make sense of what is going wrong. There are a lot of things that can stop you from commuicating, no routes setup, natting enabled on vpn traffic, and a few other things. to get down to the bottom of it as quickly as possible and to point you in the right direction I would need to see your config. I have given you the docs, even if old, that would get you there....and I am sure if you look at youtube you can find a video that will step you through the entire process. The technology doesn't change, the screens or places to check may.

The router that is hosting vpn needs to be on the edge, not behind another router that is doing nat. this can and will create issues if not done correctly. If you can have your router that you have control of access the outside directly that would be ideal, perhaps in a dmz that is not natted.

Would need to see the config one way or the other to try and make sense of what is going wrong. There are a lot of things that can stop you from commuicating, no routes setup, natting enabled on vpn traffic, and a few other things. to get down to the bottom of it as quickly as possible and to point you in the right direction I would need to see your config. I have given you the docs, even if old, that would get you there....and I am sure if you look at youtube you can find a video that will step you through the entire process. The technology doesn't change, the screens or places to check may.

Related to that, this is the setup that was shown to us by a 3rd party (the distributor of this equipment) and this does indeed work:

diagram4.png

Its a little different but one of the routers we always have control over physically instead of having it remotely. The one that would "host" VPN would be the one on the bottom on our side (bottom). The rest would basically be clients.

how are you routing data? do you have layer 3 switches in place to be able to handle routes? or are your specifically adding routes into the client pcs to state where to steer traffic to?

for simplicity sake, on the edge, there is less to troubleshoot when something fails. but if you really know what you are doing, how traffic works, and how to make things go it can be anywhere...how much troubleshooting to you know how to do? do you have a full understanding of how routing works, how port traffic works, and where things can get hosed along the way? If not, keep it as simple as possible with the least amount of possiblity to block and route along the way.

how are you routing data? do you have layer 3 switches in place to be able to handle routes? or are your specifically adding routes into the client pcs to state where to steer traffic to?

for simplicity sake, on the edge, there is less to troubleshoot when something fails. but if you really know what you are doing, how traffic works, and how to make things go it can be anywhere...how much troubleshooting to you know how to do? do you have a full understanding of how routing works, how port traffic works, and where things can get hosed along the way? If not, keep it as simple as possible with the least amount of possiblity to block and route along the way.

The thing is that this is not something I choose. This is the setup already given and I cant change it as we dont do tech stuff. We just setup the configuration on our end.

The current setup (without VPN equipment) is something like:

diagram5.png

I put R1 and R2 because after talking to my boss, it might have seem that the other company mixed up details and instead of 2 routers, there is only one.

Depending on the client, you could have a pc establish a VPN connection to the router, but from what you said you wanted an entire site to site VPN. You need to be specific in what you want and you also need to be specific as to what the client pcs are.

Site to site requires 2 edge VPN routers. Client to site requires 1 edge VPN router and a client that can be configured for VPN either natively or through add on software. If the client is a serial connection then that cannot be configured, the machine that that connects to would have to be configured. You lack a bit of details to get this working, and I am trying to ask the right questions to help you.

Depending on the client, you could have a pc establish a VPN connection to the router, but from what you said you wanted an entire site to site VPN. You need to be specific in what you want and you also need to be specific as to what the client pcs are.

Site to site requires 2 edge VPN routers. Client to site requires 1 edge VPN router and a client that can be configured for VPN either natively or through add on software. If the client is a serial connection then that cannot be configured, the machine that that connects to would have to be configured. You lack a bit of details to get this working, and I am trying to ask the right questions to help you.

I apoligize for not giving correct answers to your questions.

The end clients are basically industrial machines. Running on propiratory software, we want this system to able to do two things: Remote support and also transfer predone files (basically files, which are binary files that the machine understands) from our end to over there.

The USB port on the routers I mentioned (NB2500 and NB1600) allow to have some temporal space to transfer those files and read it via a share.

I BELIEVE Im not leaving out any details. If you need any more, just ask :)

Thanks and once again I apoligize for not answering your questions.

Although the usb ports on the routers allow for transfer of files, they are usually designed for a harddrive or a printer to be connected and configured. I do not know how it will connect up with another device that doesn't sound like one of the 2 devices that I have mentioned.

Again edge would be ideal without a great deal of troubleshooting to function properly. And by troubleshooting, meaning that if the config looks right we would need to go up the line to the next device to make sure it is passing traffic properly.

You are best off to connect a pc to the usb device, then through the pc you will have access for remote support as well as being able to setup a tunnel between the pc and the other host. Now technically there shouldn't be any difference between a pc router in this config, but the pc isn't doing any form of nat which makes it one less thing to have to troubleshoot to function properly. Keep it as simple as possible.

Although the usb ports on the routers allow for transfer of files, they are usually designed for a harddrive or a printer to be connected and configured. I do not know how it will connect up with another device that doesn't sound like one of the 2 devices that I have mentioned.

Again edge would be ideal without a great deal of troubleshooting to function properly. And by troubleshooting, meaning that if the config looks right we would need to go up the line to the next device to make sure it is passing traffic properly.

You are best off to connect a pc to the usb device, then through the pc you will have access for remote support as well as being able to setup a tunnel between the pc and the other host. Now technically there shouldn't be any difference between a pc router in this config, but the pc isn't doing any form of nat which makes it one less thing to have to troubleshoot to function properly. Keep it as simple as possible.

I explained incorrectly :) In the USB port there will be a small flash drive inserted (not 24/7 though)

The data protocal EDGE or something else? Im not familiar with the term. I have heard something about "edge servers".

The problem with these machine is that they are pretty expensive so adding a PC would increase the end cost. Thats why the configuration that was being looked at is one of these routers as they are embedded directly into the machine and can give remote access at a lower (overall) price.

Edge of Internet, not behind a nat firewall. I am pretty sure it isn't going to work as designed...the other side will not see the VPN gateway as an addressable device, it will see a computer behind the VPN gateway. If it were a VPN client, not a firewall, then it should see it. You need a computer to connect to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!