Nurse refuses student inhaler during asthma attack


Recommended Posts

DELTONA, Fla. -

Volusia County School officials stand by a Deltona High School nurse's decision to refuse a student his inhaler during an asthma attack, citing a lack of a parent's signature on a medical release form.

"It's like something out of a horror film. The person just sits there and watches you die," said Michael Rudi, 17. "She sat there, looked at me and she did nothing."

He said the school dean found his inhaler during a search of his locker last Friday. The inhaler was still in its original packaging -- complete with his name and directions for its use; however, the school took it away because his mother hadn't signed the proper form for him to have it.

School leaders called Sue Rudi when her son started having trouble breathing. She rushed to the office and was taken back to the nurse's office by school administrators and they discovered the teen on the floor.

"As soon as we opened up the door, we saw my son collapsing against the wall on the floor of the nurse's office while she was standing in the window of the locked door looking down at my son, who was in full-blown asthma attack," Rudi said.

Michael Rudi said when he started to pass out from his attack, the nurse locked the door.

"I believe that when I closed my eyes I wasn't going to wake up," he said.

The Director of Student Health Services, Cheryl Selesky, said that parents must sign the medical release form each year, which allows students to carry their prescribed drugs with them in school.

This year, the district had no record of his Rudi's signature, said Selesky.

"I mean its common sense if I saw an animal on the street in distress I would probably stop to help, why wouldn't she help a child," Sue Rudi said.

But Rudi is a senior, and his mother said the district has had records of his asthma throughout his years in the school.

She thinks her son could have died because of a technicality.

"How dare you deny my son something that we all take for granted, breath," said Sue Rudi. "Why didn't someone call 911?"

Selesky said the district is looking into whether proper procedures were followed by the school, and while nurses can't give medications without the proper authorization, it is district policy to call 911 when a student cannot breath.

Selesky could not explain why 911 was never called.

"I understand if you can't give it to him call 911," Sue Rudi said. "Why did you not call 911?"

Sue Rudi said she worries about the next student caught in a similar situation, and has filed charges against the nurse with the Volusia County Sheriff's Office.

"I want to press child endangerment charges for something they did to my son," Rudi said in the 911 call.

Local 6 reached out to the school district officials for more information, but they declined to interview.

Source

it's reasons such as this why I think High Schools public schools in general are way too strict

sure they have reasons for rules/regulations such as these but it's at times like this one where that rule should be allowed to be flat out broken/dismissed as it's causing more harm then good

The politics of the district has ZERO to do with this as stupidity is running rampant in school administrations nationwide.

Speaking as an asthmatic; in just the US 438,000 of us are hospitalized every year, and 3,300 die, due to an attack. It would be a crime if one of either were a child because of the bureaucratic needs of stupid adults.

I'd fire whoever touched this decision.

  • Like 2

I don't see the logic here. He has medical treatment with his name on it yet they took it away from him?

If he had a pacemaker due to a bad heart, would they remove that because his parents hadn't signed for it?

Or what about a wheel chair? Prosteic leg? or maybe a fake eye ball? broken arm casting? How about other prescribed long term drugs, such as blood pressure tablets or diabetics.

Was this nurse simple high, stupid, or just didn't give a damn because it was 'just' an astma attack?

Surley any ownership from problems arising from the misuse/handling of his inhaler would be down to who prescribed it.

This world is going crazy over being politally correct. Is it really so hard for people to do the right thing rather then worring about what people are going to think.

And why do people over think the situations, people are just trying to help (or not in this case!).

I don't see the logic here. He has medical treatment with his name on it yet they took it away from him?

If he had a pacemaker due to a bad heart, would they remove that because his parents hadn't signed for it?

Or what about a wheel chair? Prosteic leg? or maybe a fake eye ball? broken arm casting? How about other prescribed long term drugs, such as blood pressure tablets or diabetics.

Was this nurse simple high, stupid, or just didn't give a damn because it was 'just' an astma attack?

Surley any ownership from problems arising from the misuse/handling of his inhaler would be down to who prescribed it.

This world is going crazy over being politally correct. Is it really so hard for people to do the right thing rather then worring about what people are going to think.

And why do people over think the situations, people are just trying to help (or not in this case!).

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

Yeah, or the doctor that, you know, prescribed the medication to the kid.

That same medication that the school took away :\

This isn't asking the school to make a diagnosis and render medication. The diagnosis and medication had already been prescribed.

  • Like 2

And kids never put drugs into other packaging to hide it . . . /s

They found the inhaler during a search of his locker. He should have turned into nurse in the first place. Then no signature.

Why didn't the mother call 911 on the way to the school? It just just doesn't add up to me.

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

As far as I know, kids aren't prescribed aspirin. The kid was prescribed something, probably salbutamol (blue inhaler). What's worse, a kid dying due to a technicality or a kid potentially surviving? Also, the release is for prescribed drugs, not non-prescribed drugs.

As far as I know, kids aren't prescribed aspirin. The kid was prescribed something, probably salbutamol (blue inhaler). What's worse, a kid dying due to a technicality or a kid potentially surviving? Also, the release is for prescribed drugs, not non-prescribed drugs.

If he would have turned the inhaler in to the nurse instead of sticking in locker, problem could have been solved. The mother could have called 911, and problem solved. Everyone blaming school, but the family didn't do 3 simple things that could have prevented this. Take responsibility for your lives instead of blaming everyone else. Jesus Christ.

The school was in possession of the medication. It had confiscated the medication.

That puts ALL of the liability on their shoulders.

Furthermore, the school had a record of permission in the past, but suddenly they think it's not legit? How do you justify that?

Also, there are better ways to hide drugs than to fake an asthma inhaler :\

If he would have turned the inhaler in to the nurse instead of sticking in locker, problem could have been solved. The mother could have called 911, and problem solved. Everyone blaming school, but the family didn't do 3 simple things that could have prevented this. Take responsibility for your lives instead of blaming everyone else. Jesus Christ.

If the mother had been delayed by 20 minutes, the kid could have died.

I'm glad to hear that you value a signature over someone's life.

  • Like 1

Under any law it is the responsibility of the school to make sure the well being of the kids but the policy of not allowing them to have medication prescribed to the person without that signature is wrong and contradicts with health and safety policies

How the **** are they allowed to confiscate a prescribed medicine? I don't see how anyone could be given that right besides a licensed and trained healthcare professional. Nobody without the proper training, not the school, not the police, not event the parents should have the right to confiscate life saving medicine from a 17 year old. If they believe that the prescribed drug is not what it says on the package/bottle the police should be involved and they should contact the individual who wrote the prescription to verify it. During the time the confiscated medicine is not available the person should be closely monitored at a hospital by people who can provide verified medicine and emergency healthcare in case problems appear.

I can say that I would not allow ANYONE to confiscate any legal medicine I was in possession of.

  • Like 2

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

There could be a number of reasons for why the paper was not signed or in school possession. There isn't enough info listed to make the call on that. When your kids are in school, the school itself is responsible for the kids while they are on their grounds. The school is still to blame in this situation.

Lastly the kid is alive but the other outcome was still a possibility. You don't ignore the ignorance of the situation just because the kid is still alive.

And kids never put drugs into other packaging to hide it . . . /s

They found the inhaler during a search of his locker. He should have turned into nurse in the first place. Then no signature.

Why didn't the mother call 911 on the way to the school? It just just doesn't add up to me.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just that, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just that, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

seriously. It isn't like its a pill. Its an inhaler. You cant put something else in it.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just tha t, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

seriously. It isn't like its a pill. Its an inhaler. You cant. put something else in it.

I hate this phone. Stupid double posts.

People who are completely stuck in rules and regulation annoy the hell out of me. Have read about and met so many people who have a superiour then thou attitude because they follow the rules, they see themselves as superior people. Jeez so annoying. Damn rules!

Anyone who puts rules before lives deserves to lose badly in a similar situation. It's a nice learning experience. So, yes, really.

um ok, Did HE put the rules before the students life? No. He simply said they should have followed the rules, and you wished someone close to him death, so he could learn NOT to have an opinion? Really?

The rules are there to protect the school/staff from being sued, if the inhaler had been tampered with and the nurse had given it AND the student died, or got worse or any of another ****ing things, the parents would have laywered up and sued the school for breaking their own rules and some other ****. Now, they will laywer up and sue for causing little Michael stress, since he is fine now. So, damned if you do and damned if you don't.

Never mind this all could have been avoided if they had filled out the paper work given them at the beginning of the year...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!