Recommended Posts

A 16-year-old schoolboy has solved a mathematical problem which has stumped mathematicians for centuries, a newspaper report said. The boy put the historical breakthrough down to ?schoolboy naivety.?

Shouryya Ray, who moved to Germany from India with his family at the age of 12, has baffled scientists and mathematicians by solving two fundamental particle dynamics problems posed by Sir Isaac Newton over 350 years ago, Die Welt newspaper reported on Monday.

Ray?s solutions make it possible to now calculate not only the flight path of a ball, but also predict how it will hit and bounce off a wall. Previously it had only been possible to estimate this using a computer, wrote the paper.

Ray first came across the old problem when his secondary school, which specializes in science, set all their year-11 pupils a research project.

On a visit to the Technical University in Dresden pupils received raw data to evaluate a direct numerical simulation ? which can be used to describe the trajectory of a ball when it is thrown.

When he realised the current method could not get an exact result, Ray decided to have a go at solving it. He puts the whole thing down to ?schoolboy naivety? -

... he just refused to accept there was no answer to the problem.

?I asked myself: why can?t it work?? he told the paper.

Ray has been fascinated by what he calls the ?intrinsic beauty? of maths since an early age, according to the report. The boy was inspired by his engineer father who began setting him arithmetic problems at the age of six.

He recently won a youth science competition at the state level in Saxony and won second place in the Maths and IT section at the national final.

Originally from Calcutta, Ray couldn?t speak a word of German when he came to Dresden four years ago ? but now he is fluent. Since then, he was moved up two classes in school and is currently sitting his Abitur exams two years early.

But Ray doesn?t think he?s a genius, and told the paper he has weak points as a mathematician, as well as in sports and social sciences.

Ray, whose recent breakthrough may have earned him a paragraph in the schoolbooks of the future, is currently deciding whether to study maths or physics at university.

source

  • Like 2

The paper then ask Ray, "do you have any future plans?" He replied with YES, I plan to be the first living being to walk on the Sun. "How do you plan on doing that without burning up?" the paper asked.. Ray said easy... I am gonna go at night.

  • Like 3
The paper then ask Ray, "do you have any future plans?" He replied with YES, I plan to be the first living being to walk on the Sun. "How do you plan on doing that without burning up?" the paper asked.. Ray said easy... I am gonna go at night.

While I groaned when I first heard that some years ago, I'm not entirely sure how a blonde joke relates to a story about a clever schoolboy mathematician...

It's pretty crazy to think that for 350 years people have been working and trying to find a solution to this, and then this boy comes along and solves it.

Would be nice if they gave a short description of the exact problem, and the solution approach.

"fundamental particle dynamics"

Not the n-body problem. Or maybe it is. For one object, physics has the kinematic equations that solve the problem they seem to hint at, but that's clearly not what they are talking about. Anyone have any ideas?

2_motion_eq7.jpg

Would be nice if they gave a short description of the exact problem, and the solution approach.

"fundamental particle dynamics"

Not the n-body problem. For one object, physics has the kinematic equations that solve the problem they seem to hint at, but that's clearly not what they are talking about. Anyone have any ideas?

Yeah, I was wondering that too. The article doesn't explain what the problem is, why it has stumped scientists for so long, or what his solution is.

Though, to be honest I'm a little confused as to how predicting trajectories and collisions was an unsolved problem up to this point. I remember doing those exact type of problems in physics classes throughout high school and college. I don't remember anything saying that the formulas and principles we were using were just "best guess".

Yeah, I was wondering that too. The article doesn't explain what the problem is, why it has stumped scientists for so long, or what his solution is.

Though, to be honest I'm a little confused as to how predicting trajectories and collisions was an unsolved problem up to this point. I remember doing those exact type of problems in physics classes throughout high school and college. I don't remember anything saying that the formulas and principles we were using were just "best guess".

That's because the equations we were using are in fact exact. But solving a different problem.

No, I'm pretty sure this is talking about the n-body problem. There isn't an exact analytic solution for more than 2 objects. Although this guy apparently says there is.

Seriously. Considering Indians age verrrrrrrrrry well.

I know lots of 16 year old boys who look old. Im 20 but i look like 22-23 old guy, well because of my height. ( Im north Indian ) :p

The problem involved calculating the path of a projectile that is subject to both gravity and air resistance. Ray also solved a second problem, involving a body colliding with a wall, as part of a school project.

http://www.rawstory....d-isaac-newton/

http://www.canada.co...5617/story.html

That makes sense. So... add air resistance to kinematic equations [easier said than done]... I can see that.

The second one... object colliding with a wall. An exact analytic solution would be nice. Although it probably includes a number of simplifying assumptions. Is the ball compressible [like a spring]? Does this only work for balls, or other objects as well?

Apparently the solution was already implicitly known [but still impressive if independently determined]: http://www.df.uba.ar/users/sgil/physics_paper_doc/papers_phys/mechan/air0.pdf

As for the rest... it's in this picture, but hard to see... and in German...

shouryya1.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!