Recommended Posts

A group of young students at an all girls school were left in "mass hypnosis" after a demonstration from a fledging hypnotist reportedly left them locked in a trance.

Maxime Nadeau was forced to call on his mentor for assistance after the hypnotist could not reverse the condition of several 12 and 13-year-old girls at the Coll?ge du Sacr?-Coeur private school in Quebec. One of the girls was reportedly left in a trance for five hours.

"Being in a trance is a state of well-being," Nadeau told the CBC's French-language service. "I wasn't stressed. I knew they would get out of it."

Still, Nadeau eventually called in his mentor and trainer Richard Whitbread to reverse the effects.

"There were a couple of students who had their heads lying on the table and there were [others] who, you could tell, were in trance," Whitbread said. "The eyes were open and there was nobody home."

In order to reverse the effect, Whitbread says he convinced the girls he was "re-hypnotizing" them and them brought them out of the trance "using a stern voice."

"I don't know how to explain it. It's like you're no longer there," student ?milie Bertrand told the CBC about her experience. "You're spaced out."

Nonetheless, Bertrand described the experience as "cool" as said she would do it again, even knowing the potential consequences.

Interestingly, Whitbread said the girls may have been especially vulnerable to Nadeau's suggestions because of his young age and "good looks." :shifty:

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1085565-mass-hypnosis-goes-wrong/
Share on other sites

^ "Oh ye of little faith" :laugh:

I wonder what would have happened if they gave suggestions of drugs are not good, don't smoke, get a good college education, be excellent to each other ... hmm.

Ah forget it -- the world probably collapse.

Seriously, how the hell do people still believe in this nonsense? Hypnotism isn't real, people.

Yet weve seen people put animals in "trances" and or "hypnotize" them. Im skeptical of Humans, however its a well known fact all sorts of animals will enter trances after certain conditions are met.

Everything from lobsters to rabbits, to bovine`s and more.

Lobster how to - http://www.banderasn...wto/lobster.htm

The famous Bulldog, is called just that because it was used as a means to hypnotize cows and horses. i.e you bite or clamp down on there top lips and they enter a trance like state in which a farmer can do anything to them, thus Bulldogs.

So im a little open to the possibility that theres some set of parameters that could trick us humans too, after all were just fancy animals.

Severial people in my graduating class were hypnotized.. I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't know the people personally and their character.

That said there are limits, you can't make someone do anything.. They were not fully "aware" but if you asked them to do something too far outside of their bounds they wouldn't.. so no turning them all into slaves or anything lol... then again these were french girls..

but then, how do people get hypnotised?

i knew people at uni who i saw get hypnotised.. to this day i do not believe they were putting it on

I've seen it explained by people who actually DO it on stage. There is no "trance" state at all, in 99% of cases, the "mark" is already predisposed to believing the hypnotist, so it's easy to make them think they're entering a trance like state where they can be made to do certain things. This entirely self-imposed conviction acts so that the mark complies with the hypnotists suggestions entirely willingly even though later they'll try to convince themselves and others that they didn't do all those silly things.

It's why doubters (or the "strong willed" as hypnotists call them) can't be hypnotised; because it isn't real.

I've seen it explained by people who actually DO it on stage. There is no "trance" state at all, in 99% of cases, the "mark" is already predisposed to believing the hypnotist, so it's easy to make them think they're entering a trance like state where they can be made to do certain things. This entirely self-imposed conviction acts so that the mark complies with the hypnotists suggestions entirely willingly even though later they'll try to convince themselves and others that they didn't do all those silly things.

It's why doubters (or the "strong willed" as hypnotists call them) can't be hypnotised; because it isn't real.

But then that is actually getting hypnotized.

  • Like 1

But then that is actually getting hypnotized.

No it isn't. There is no trance state involved, period. The mark is just persuaded to go along willingly and if they wanted, could just stop at any time and give the whole game away. Their belief in the whole nonsense generally means they go along with it, though. However, it's just a confidence trick that preys on the gullible.

Although it wasn't the program where I saw how it works, Penn and Teller also did a part on it in their Bullsh*t program, and they said exactly the same thing. These guys are stage magicians, they do hypnotism as part of their act; they know how it's done and they're well known for revealing such things to the public.

Darren Brown (famous "mentalist" from tv-shows like Trick of the Mind) has made a few audiobooks about hypnotism and he makes it very clear that it's not real. Even though it's fake, there's still a fair amount of skill involved. The subjects are not stooges, but people who are tricked into thinking they really are hypnotised. Even before the "hypnotism", there's a rather involved process of picking suitable people from the audience, people who show signs of being susceptible to suggestion. He also went into some of the tricks he uses when putting them into the "trance", like altering the instructions he's giving the subject to match things he sees in their body language, for example: tricking them into tensing up, and then when he spots the person relaxing again telling the subject that their body suddenly feels lighter.

  • Like 1

Hypnosis is quite real, however, being in a trance type state I have a hard time believing. Hypnotism is not what most people think, or what a few people on this thread think, it is merely a state of deep relaxation where the unconscious becomes more active and in control than the conscious mind is. Hypnosis is more about mind manipulation and we all know mind controls the body, this shows in PTSD and mass hysteria. If you can convince the mind of something then the body will soon then follow.

I have seen hypnotists make some people feel hot and cold, forget numbers or general items they knew for their entire lives. Just mind games and more people who have control of their mind and though process are not as susceptible to hypnosis as others. Another reason would be they intentionally do not follow instructions just to be deviants and just say "this person is a fraud."

There are people who use it as a gimmick, but hypnosis is actually a practiced medicine because it allows someone to become fully relaxed which in that state suggestions can be made to the subconscious to change various things.

Just my two cents.

I've seen it explained by people who actually DO it on stage. There is no "trance" state at all, in 99% of cases, the "mark" is already predisposed to believing the hypnotist, so it's easy to make them think they're entering a trance like state where they can be made to do certain things. This entirely self-imposed conviction acts so that the mark complies with the hypnotists suggestions entirely willingly even though later they'll try to convince themselves and others that they didn't do all those silly things.

It's why doubters (or the "strong willed" as hypnotists call them) can't be hypnotised; because it isn't real.

Hypnosis exists you can google many entries on medical hypnosis, my own aunt was under hypnosis to quit smoking and it worked. She wasn't some "mark" called onto a stage, and it is in fact recognized by the US Department of Labor as well as other Occupational Accreditation and monitoring orgs

I agree with Itylernallen on this one. I was about to come in say pretty much what he did.

Being strong minded obviously makes it less likely that you will cede control of your mind to someone (or even have the capability of doing it).

Medical hypnosis has been known to work, but again it requires someone with a "weak" mind. Someone who is willing to let external influences into their minds.

You can't make someone do something they don't want to do. People who quit smoking by way of hypnosis are a good example of this. They already want to quit, but they haven't quit got the mental control. Introducing the idea into the subconscious means it's always there and always influencing your thoughts generally without you even being aware.

It's simply a form of manipulation. If you are bright enough, you can do it without having to do the hypnosis thing.. You can plant ideas in peoples minds without hynosis or inception simply by saying the right linking words that will drag the persons mind there on its own. /shrug

Darren Brown (famous "mentalist" from tv-shows like Trick of the Mind) has made a few audiobooks about hypnotism and he makes it very clear that it's not real. Even though it's fake, there's still a fair amount of skill involved. The subjects are not stooges, but people who are tricked into thinking they really are hypnotised. Even before the "hypnotism", there's a rather involved process of picking suitable people from the audience, people who show signs of being susceptible to suggestion. He also went into some of the tricks he uses when putting them into the "trance", like altering the instructions he's giving the subject to match things he sees in their body language, for example: tricking them into tensing up, and then when he spots the person relaxing again telling the subject that their body suddenly feels lighter.

his and other "magicians" may not be real using thier tricks but hypnosis itself is. Just what they may be doing on stage may not be qualified actually as hypnosis

Darren Brown (famous "mentalist" from tv-shows like Trick of the Mind) has made a few audiobooks about hypnotism and he makes it very clear that it's not real. Even though it's fake, there's still a fair amount of skill involved. The subjects are not stooges, but people who are tricked into thinking they really are hypnotised. Even before the "hypnotism", there's a rather involved process of picking suitable people from the audience, people who show signs of being susceptible to suggestion. He also went into some of the tricks he uses when putting them into the "trance", like altering the instructions he's giving the subject to match things he sees in their body language, for example: tricking them into tensing up, and then when he spots the person relaxing again telling the subject that their body suddenly feels lighter.

Derren Brown not Darren

No it isn't. There is no trance state involved, period. The mark is just persuaded to go along willingly and if they wanted, could just stop at any time and give the whole game away. Their belief in the whole nonsense generally means they go along with it, though. However, it's just a confidence trick that preys on the gullible.

Although it wasn't the program where I saw how it works, Penn and Teller also did a part on it in their Bullsh*t program, and they said exactly the same thing. These guys are stage magicians, they do hypnotism as part of their act; they know how it's done and they're well known for revealing such things to the public.

Yes, I read this abut PnT to be authentic where stage magic is concerned, you cant beat them, but I remember the show they did about global warming being fake and impossible bs, was exactly that, the denial of science. They are pro entertainers, not scientists, not even technicians, but they can be funny as f**k :D

Now, back to that power of suggestion debate lol....

No it isn't. There is no trance state involved, period. The mark is just persuaded to go along willingly and if they wanted, could just stop at any time and give the whole game away. Their belief in the whole nonsense generally means they go along with it, though. However, it's just a confidence trick that preys on the gullible.

Although it wasn't the program where I saw how it works, Penn and Teller also did a part on it in their Bullsh*t program, and they said exactly the same thing. These guys are stage magicians, they do hypnotism as part of their act; they know how it's done and they're well known for revealing such things to the public.

except their belief in it makes them unable to get out of it, thus hypnotized.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!