Thinking of switching to AT&T Uverse for Internet


Recommended Posts

I thinking of switching to AT&T Uverse as it will be cheaper then what I am currently paying Comcast. Has anyone had any experience with uVerse? I am being offered the 12 mb/s connection which is equal to what I have with Comcast. I would be paying $85 +taxes /month for a year, which beats Comcast which is charging me $75 /month for internet and TV.

How is $85 a month cheaper than $75 a month?

I have directv for my TV, and only pay comcast for internet. So I can not really compare my prices to yours. But I get 20 down / 2 up with 25/4 burst and I only pay $48.95

I don't even show them offering a 12Mb plan -- performance is 20/4 and blast is 30/6 -- starter is like 6/1 and economy is 3/768k.. Then they have plans with 50 and 105, etc.

Maybe its different in FL? But again not understanding how 85 is cheaper than 75 ;)

I have Comcast and I love it! They got me a special deal for the 20 meg plan and it is fast as far as I can see. I do not like ATT so I stay far away!

Comcast is $75 /month phone is $35 /month so we are at $110 /month where we would be paying $85 /month for AT&T

When was the last time you ran a promo from comcast?? Seems like a lot more than what most people I know pay (northeast florida). Are you on the economy voice package? or the standard? In regards to uverse, I've heard mix results on service.. . if you need more info, i'll ask for you.

Best bet, if you already have the 3x bundle look into the anyroom service that should put you on a years promo, just make sure you roll back when it's done.

I have the 12 mb/s connection through Uverse and I couldn't be happier.

Comcast isn't in my area so my only other alternative is Cox Communications. (N)

I've had Uverse for 3 years and I get a consistent 12 mb/s and never had an outage whether there are storms or not. When I had Cox, there were outages all the time.

^My wife does not want VOIP, despite my reassuring her that its fine. We currently have local/long distance with AT&T ~$35 /month and Internet/TV with Comcast which is currently running $75 /month and the speed has been lagging lately, and since we live in an apartment the node is shared with everyone else who has service, so it's never consistent speed.

I guess it's not bad, my friend had U-Verse. I've had it too and even used to sell it but i'd never switch from my cable connection to that. For you speeds are lower so you don't really care but since they can't offer more than 24/3Mbps it's a no-go for me. I have 50/8Mbps now which U-Verse can't touch, even when they dream :)

As for the service itself though, it worked just fine. Seems my friend however had issues with billing but that could just be a special case. I used it at her house and it's fine, i just hate their required routers too but I love the fact that the boxes can be all networked instead of coaxial cable :) I ran everything over LAN in her house and they offer WIFI options now.

Trust me as a former AT&T employee, it will be the biggest headache of your life. Stick what what you have, it's not worth the hassle I promise. Especially in Florida, 98% of the calls I got were from there and people just hated it. Installed incorrectly, promised service but never got it, inconsistent connection and speeds and numerous billing problems.

Trust me as a former AT&T employee, it will be the biggest headache of your life. Stick what what you have, it's not worth the hassle I promise.

Care to explain what you mean?

Never had a problem with Uverse here. Speed always comes through as advertised and is a better deal than Comcast in my area. The installer was also very good considering what he had to do to run my cable. I'm surprised I wasn't charged extra. TV picture looks great, probably not quite as good as DirecTV but definitely better than I got through cable.

If I wanted 50mbps+ internet, I'd probably get Comcast, but their installers here are so terrible that I wouldn't want to risk having holes punched all over my walls.

Trust me as a former AT&T employee, it will be the biggest headache of your life. Stick what what you have, it's not worth the hassle I promise. Especially in Florida, 98% of the calls I got were from there and people just hated it. Installed incorrectly, promised service but never got it, inconsistent connection and speeds and numerous billing problems.

And as a current AT&T employee, I second this. Crappy ping, inconsistant internet speeds, awful customer support, etc...

the speed has been lagging lately, and since we live in an apartment the node is shared with everyone else who has service, so it's never consistent speed.

IDK Man... It shouldn't just start lagging. Those nodes are designed from the get-go to handle the load of that complex(just as the ones that feed any other complex or neighborhood). I would suspect that you have some type of noise issue or line problem going on, espeically with all the freaking rain we have been having.... Report it(intermittent connectivity issues), and have them come out. If it doesn't fix the problem, report it again until it does. Once it becomes escallated they will do something about it..... either based on reimbursments or by fixing the issue entierly. Either way, nothing will happen until you do that..

Also, while speeds are strained during peak times, it should still stay a pretty consistent expierience(not gradually getting worse). Remember that just because your apartment is good-to-go, the kid on the first level may have thought it was a good idea to electrical-tape together some cable instead of buying a splitter and is screwing the whole complex up...

I only bring that up because when I lived in maryland this guy did something similiar in my building.. so I called and complaiend for about a month until they figured it out! Ever since they had done that my service was perfect (also got a credit on my bill yup yup)....

Well Comcast decided to lower the bill back to the level it was at before! Now the issue I have is according to Comcast, I'm supposed to be on a 20 megabit connection, however, after running a series of Speedtests, the highest speed I obtained was ~14, with an over all average of approx 11. I plan on checking this again in the morning and calling them if the issue persists!

You sure its not just say a limit because of your router -- what router do you have.. Some older models just can not pump out move that low teens.

This could be true. I know my very old linksys router couldn't pump it. Got an N router with n adapters and all was well again.

I am happy with my u-verse install. I got the 24/3 Max Turbo plan for a promotional price of $45/month. I speedtest at those speeds, download at about 3MB/s.

The only downside is the router / gateway is provided by them. No matter what you do, since there is no true bridge mode, you will be limited to that. It has a limit of 1024 NAT sessions.

I have U-verse for Internet and TV. The TV service is great. I have a wireless box in the living room. Internet is great as well. I have 24mbps down and it's always consistent. Never had an outage.

HOWEVER, depending on where you are located you may get terrible TV service. I don't know the details of the tech they use differently from location to location, but I can tell you positively they will install the service even if it will be terrible. Like I said, I have U-verse and it's installed optimally. Some family a couple miles down also have U-verse and they installed it completely differently. I have IP-TV in my house but they require Coaxial because of the type of cabling they had to run to the house - it can't support the bandwidth.

Also, ping times are lower and I have weird disconnects on some online games at times.

Honestly, it's the TV service being great and bundling with wireless phones that keeps me with them. I'd probably get Comcast otherwise.

I am happy with my u-verse install. I got the 24/3 Max Turbo plan for a promotional price of $45/month. I speedtest at those speeds, download at about 3MB/s.

The only downside is the router / gateway is provided by them. No matter what you do, since there is no true bridge mode, you will be limited to that. It has a limit of 1024 NAT sessions.

Ah yes, and there is this. The router they provide sucks and you need to use it :/ I have a group of static IPs though which allows me to alleviate their router as much as possible and direct all traffic to mine.

You sure its not just say a limit because of your router -- what router do you have.. Some older models just can not pump out move that low teens.

Netgear WNDR 3300, so I am sure it's not the router

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!