Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Gaming 'Battlefield 4' beta outed on EA Origin Store


41 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 +Mephistopheles

    Member N° 1,302

  • 19,394 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 01
  • Location: Frankfurt, DE
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Nexus 4

Posted 15 July 2012 - 15:38

Gaming 'Battlefield 4' beta outed on EA Origin Store

Battlefield 4 beta has been outed by Electronic Arts.

A listing for Medal of Honor Warfighter on EA's Origin Store appears to confirm that customers who pre-order the game will gain access to the beta.



Posted Image

© EA

Battlefield 4 is yet to be officially unveiled by EA, but the studio has admitted that it is working on a new entry in the series, and the Origin listing appears to offer confirmation.

Battlefield 3 is already one of the company's most successful games, breaking its shipping record with ten million copies to retailers on launch day.

EA launched the Battlefield Premium subscription service last month, granting users access to new content two weeks before it is made available to the public for an annual fee of $49.99 (£34.99).

Developer DICE recently added the 'Matches' feature to the game's multiplayer to help users who rent a dedicated server to coordinate online games with friends and squad members.


Source: digital spy


#2 ahhell

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,332 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 15 July 2012 - 15:51

Is anyone actually surprised that there'll be yet another Battlefield?

#3 +Shikaka

    The Great White Bat

  • 976 posts
  • Joined: 27-October 06
  • Location: UK
  • OS: Win 7 & 2008r2
  • Phone: iPhone 4S

Posted 15 July 2012 - 15:59

Need another Battlefield 2142!

#4 Blackhearted

    .....

  • 2,549 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 04
  • Location: Ohio
  • Phone: HTC One V

Posted 15 July 2012 - 16:03

Between BF3 ending up being disappointing, and ea wanting to make the game into a subscription based thing(which is guaranteed to only get wore with a new game) i think i could pass on a BF4.

#5 +Vice

    Bye!

  • 15,877 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 04

Posted 15 July 2012 - 16:04

Bit soon I feel. It won't offer anything new other than different maps and vehicles. Not enough time has passed since BF3 for them to be able to add anything substantial in my opinion.

I think realistically the two biggest things that would need to change for me to accept a new Battlefield 3 game would be drastically increased graphical hardware in the hands of most consumers (so lets say 5 years from now) and much better broadband so that they can increase the player cap from 64 to 128 which would make it feel closer to a real war zone.

But my logic doesn't affect EA's decisions they just want to milk a cow dry.

#6 Javik

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,308 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 12

Posted 15 July 2012 - 18:43

Precisely that. The CoD series are being milked like a cash cow, and now EA want to do the same with battlefield. I got BF3 free with my CPU, and uninstalled it after one playthrough of the SP campaign and the chances are I'm not going to bother with BF4 either. War based shooters are becoming a boring cliche in my opinion.

#7 Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 15 July 2012 - 18:53

View PostBlackhearted, on 15 July 2012 - 16:03, said:

Between BF3 ending up being disappointing, and ea wanting to make the game into a subscription based thing(which is guaranteed to only get wore with a new game) i think i could pass on a BF4.

BF3 disappointing? Are you being serious right now?

Dude, the game did have its issues and bus on release but most of them have been fixed now. The game plays smoothly and without issues. It is ten times better than COD. What I don't agree with is the fact that EA wants to make yet another BF game. Really, there is nothing wrong with the current one. What they need to do is concentrate their efforts and resources on making the current one better and not waste money or resources in making a new one. The graphics on the current version are amazing and I just don't see it getting any better than that for a while.

#8 Blackhearted

    .....

  • 2,549 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 04
  • Location: Ohio
  • Phone: HTC One V

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:02

View PostScorbing, on 15 July 2012 - 18:53, said:

BF3 disappointing? Are you being serious right now?

Dude, the game did have its issues and bus on release but most of them have been fixed now. The game plays smoothly and without issues. It is ten times better than COD. What I don't agree with is the fact that EA wants to make yet another BF game. Really, there is nothing wrong with the current one. What they need to do is concentrate their efforts and resources on making the current one better and not waste money or resources in making a new one. The graphics on the current version are amazing and I just don't see it getting any better than that for a while.

Yes, i am. It was disappointing and didn't live up to the hype to me. Hard to say why, but i just couldn't get into it and enjoyed BC2 much more. And that's without taking the out of game flaws of requiring origin and that less than great "battlelog" into account.

Edit: i do agree though, that it's still better than CoD.

#9 Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:06

View PostBlackhearted, on 15 July 2012 - 19:02, said:

Yes, i am. It was disappointing and didn't live up to the hype to me. Hard to say why, but i just couldn't get into it and enjoyed BC2 much more. And that's without taking the out of game flaws of requiring origin and that less than great "battlelog" into account.

Well I do agree with you about Origin. The Battlelog thing is OK. I kinda like the way it tells you about your score and all that, but Origin is a pain in the ass. Totally unnecessary. BF2 didn't require that POS to work so why make it a "must have" application on BF3? Beats me what they were thinking about on that one. Overral I think the game is amazing and it would be much better if EA would get rid of that stupid Origin. The new Close Quarters maps are amazing.

#10 Shane Ekanayake

    Neowinian²

  • 198 posts
  • Joined: 07-September 11
  • OS: Win 7

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:14

looks like they gonna adapt to yearly releases cycle like COD (N)

#11 Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:15

View PostShane Ekanayake, on 15 July 2012 - 19:14, said:

looks like they gonna adapt to yearly releases cycle like COD (N)

I hope not.

#12 Deranged

    Star Citizen

  • 3,551 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • Location: The Cities of the Future
  • OS: 8 x64

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:23

View PostScorbing, on 15 July 2012 - 19:06, said:

Well I do agree with you about Origin. The Battlelog thing is OK. I kinda like the way it tells you about your score and all that, but Origin is a pain in the ass. Totally unnecessary. BF2 didn't require that POS to work so why make it a "must have" application on BF3? Beats me what they were thinking about on that one. Overral I think the game is amazing and it would be much better if EA would get rid of that stupid Origin. The new Close Quarters maps are amazing.
BF2 also didn't let you buy the DLC while in game and have them install all on their own. Updates were also not in a central app, which I at least find annoying when I want to play a game and have to spend time updating it.

#13 dead.cell

    My Body My Temple

  • 7,767 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 04
  • Location: Houston, TX
  • OS: Win 7 Pro / Win 8 Pro
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy SII

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:33

BF3 is awesome I think. Really has me spoiled now, wishing to see more games utilizing the Frostbite 2.0 engine. I can't even touch Call of Duty's multiplayer anymore because of it. It's just not nearly as fun, nor as team oriented as BF3 can be. I'm a veteran of the class play with games like Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory so this is really filling out nicely.

Regarding Origin: yeah. It's a piece of crap. But at least it launches the games fine, which is really all I care about, thus my issues with it are kind of moot. Battlelog is amazing too, I didn't expect to like it as much as I ended up. Makes it hella easy to keep up with people, servers, platoons, stats, and everything.

Anyway... it amazes me that people are considering BF4 to be news, as if we didn't expect it to come into play eventually. What has ME in shock is that $70 price tag for Medal of Honor. Seriously guys, what the HELL is THAT?!!! :angry:

#14 Hahaiah

    Resident Fanatic

  • 814 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 05

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:36

I wanted to buy BF3, but after reading about the ridiculous install and login procedures I decided to pass. I'd like to have it as an online shooter, but for $70, it better deliver and NOT be a pain in the ass to deal with or I'll just pass again.

#15 Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 15 July 2012 - 19:39

View Postdead.cell, on 15 July 2012 - 19:33, said:

BF3 is awesome I think. Really has me spoiled now, wishing to see more games utilizing the Frostbite 2.0 engine. I can't even touch Call of Duty's multiplayer anymore because of it. It's just not nearly as fun, nor as team oriented as BF3 can be. I'm a veteran of the class play with games like Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory so this is really filling out nicely.

Regarding Origin: yeah. It's a piece of crap. But at least it launches the games fine, which is really all I care about, thus my issues with it are kind of moot. Battlelog is amazing too, I didn't expect to like it as much as I ended up. Makes it hella easy to keep up with people, servers, platoons, stats, and everything.

Anyway... it amazes me that people are considering BF4 to be news, as if we didn't expect it to come into play eventually. What has ME in shock is that $70 price tag for Medal of Honor. Seriously guys, what the HELL is THAT?!!! :angry:


I agree. COD sucks. You can't get on any vehicles, fly anything, no matter how many times you shoot at a building with a rocket, it won't come down. The destruction on BF3 is unlike any other game out there. Driving or flying vehicles and being able to destroy everything is what makes it fun.