Texas to execute inmate diagnosed as 'mentally retarded'


Recommended Posts

Guardian - A death row prisoner who has been medically diagnosed as "mentally retarded" and therefore exempt from execution is set to die on Tuesday in Texas, a state that rejects scientific consensus and instead applies its own definition of learning difficulties based on a character in a John Steinbeck novel.

Barring a last minute intervention by the courts, Marvin Wilson, 54, will be put to death by lethal injection even though he has been subjected to scientifically-recognised tests that show him to be intellectually disabled ? or "mentally retarded" as the US legal system still calls the condition.

In 2002, the US supreme court banned executions for all such prisoners under the Eighth Amendment of the constitution that prohibits excessive punishment. The 2002 ban, in Atkins v Virginia, is categorical: individuals with mental retardation cannot be put to death. The court allowed some discretion on the part of individual states to devise procedures for administering the injunction, but no right to ignore it.

Source

So basically the state of Texas can do what ever the hell they want to do? A kind of 'To hell with the law?' or is this just a way for everyone to feel pity for the prisoner?

Marvin Lee Wilson (born 5 January 1958) is a prisoner who has been on death row in Texas since May 9, 1992[1] for the murder of a police drug informant.[2] Wilson abducted and shot 21-year-old Jerry Robert Williams following a physical confrontation between the two in the 1500 block of Verone in Beaumont. At the time of the murder, Wilson had two previous convictions for robbery.[1]

He didn't pull that off with the IQ of 61, also, the way this article trivializes the system Texas uses is not needed. That said, I am torn on the death penalty as it currently sits because I agree with it, but more often then not minorities and blacks get it before their white counterparts for similar crimes.

So basically the state of Texas can do what ever the hell they want to do? A kind of 'To hell with the law?' or is this just a way for everyone to feel pity for the prisoner?

The US Supreme Court gave a nebulous decision back then. They ruled out executing the mentally retarded, but did not define it. That they turned back to the state legislatures to decide.

What little guidance they did give may not help this guy;

....that a person not only has substandard intellectual functioning but also significant limitations in adaptive skills such as communication, self-care, and self-direction.

so if he could care for himself, communicate, etc. he could well not meet the legal definition outlined by SCOTUS.

what does it matter if he retarded he murdered someone and was found guilty.

A retard is deemed not to have the mental capacity to understand the consequences of their actions.

A retard is deemed not to have the mental capacity to understand the consequences of their actions.

and that doesn't mean they shouldn't face the consequence either or every murder would be claiming they are retarded to get away with their crime.

A retard is deemed not to have the mental capacity to understand the consequences of their actions.

I know what a retard is. but to me it should not matter. He is still a threat to society that why he in prison. This could be a good time for the family to sue the state.

and that doesn't mean they shouldn't face the consequence either or every murder would be claiming they are retarded to get away with their crime.

The US Supreme Court disagrees. And even so they wouldn't "get away with the crime" - they'd still be facing life in prison.

Hmm, where did I hear that a law is a law if its broke the person must be punished, no exceptions..

May want to read the article to see what's controversial about it:

Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing mentally retarded individuals violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments.

Hmm, where did I hear that a law is a law if its broke the person must be punished, no exceptions..

in Atkins v Virginia, is categorical: individuals with mental retardation cannot be put to death.

Reading. Does a body good.

SCOTUS defined it thusly -

....that a person not only has substandard intellectual functioning but also significant limitations in adaptive skills such as communication, self-care, and self-direction.

so if he could self-care, communicate etc. he may not meet that standard.

Which brings us back to, why is the US the only western country to execute people?

It's barbaric and deserves no place in a civilised society... much like guns. *Opens can of worms* :rofl:

So say someone goes on a murdering spree he should get life in prison at the expense of the tax payers? No thanks.
  • Like 3

So say someone goes on a murdering spree he should get life in prison at the expense of the tax payers? No thanks.

It costs more to execute a person than to let them remain in jail for the rest of their lives. Even so, is the US obsession with money so extreme that people would rather execute prisoners if it would save money? And all this from a country that talks up its Christian values. Crazy.

As opposed to the more expensive Death Penalty? At the expense of the tax payers?

Most of the cost comes from the trail. If someone like james holmes gets arrested for murdering people you really think he's innocent? No need to drag on the process. Whos going to argue that hes innocent anyway? Swift justice. innocent until proven guilty? I believe the people he killed pretty much proves hes guilty.

Most of the cost comes from the trail. If someone like james holmes gets arrested for murdering people you really think he's innocent? No need to drag on the process. Whos going to argue that hes innocent anyway? Swift justice. innocent until proven guilty? I believe the people he killed pretty much proves hes guilty.

Doesn't matter if they're innocent or not. That's the whole point of the justice system. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Take that away and you'd have chaos/riots over the right to a fair trial.

Out of all the people here, YOU would be one of the people who should be in favour of this right to a fair trial. Being part of the Constitution and all.. you know.. the same Constitution that gives you the right to bear arms?

  • Like 2

Doesn't matter if they're innocent or not. That's the whole point of the justice system. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Take that away and you'd have chaos/riots over the right to a fair trial.

So he has a chance to be proven innocent? The trial will drag on and on when everyone knows he's guilty even the court of law. I'm not saying this should be the case for ALL cases but when someone shoots up a bunch of people and has numerous witnesses and gives him self up to the police. He's guilty right there and everyone knows it. If it was up to me I would of hanged him on the spot. Call me barbaric all you want but it would save a hell of a lot of money to just get rid of them right then and there. Again I wouldn't consider it for all cases only the most extreme cases. Death penalty swift and fast for anyone that commits mass murder. Kind of drifting off the topic a little but.
So he has a chance to be proven innocent? The trial will drag on and on when everyone knows he's guilty even the court of law.

But what if he's mentally insane after years of physical abuse and sexual molestation by his parents? What if he was unaware of what he was doing and with treatment he could become sane again? The whole point of the court system is to consider all the evidence and make an informed decision. The only reason you have that opinion of him is because of what you've seen in the media, yet much of that could be wrong.

I don't know why I'm bothering to explain the justice system to someone that puts guns in their signature. You'd probably rather shoot him in the street and be done with it.

But what if he's mentally insane after years of physical abuse and sexual molestation by his parents? What if he was unaware of what he was doing and with treatment he could become sane again? The whole point of the court system is to consider all the evidence and make an informed decision. The only reason you have that opinion of him is because of what you've seen in the media, yet much of that could be wrong.

I don't know why I'm bothering to explain the justice system to someone that puts guns in their signature. You'd probably rather shoot him in the street and be done with it.

Oh you act so high and mighty. You reek of arrogance. Making excuses for criminals now are we? You don't have to explain anything to me I know how the justice system works. I was explaining how I'd run it though. No I wouldn't shoot him in the street, i'd make him eat English cooking, that would make him beg for mercy. :)
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!