Jump to content



Photo

US judge tosses Apple suit against Motorola


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:34

SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) - A federal judge on Monday tossed out an Apple lawsuit accusing Google-owned Motorola Mobility of trying to charge the iPhone maker too much for licenses to essential technology for mobile devices.

US District Court Judge Barbara Crabb dismissed the case after a week of pre-trial legal wrangling that evidently convinced her that the matter was headed for prolonged litigation instead of earnest resolution.

Apple filed suit against Motorola Mobility early last year after Motorola claimed it was due 2.25 percent royalty on sales of devices powered by iOS software, using patented Wi-Fi and video technology.

Apple argued that the price was too high because the technology was in a category considered industry-essential and therefore had to be licensed under terms that are "fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory" (FRAND).

Crabb sided with Apple regarding the FRAND status of the Motorola technology but dismissed the case on Monday, when the trial was to begin, after Apple placed conditions on whether it would accept license terms set by the judge.

"The case cannot proceed to trial on the remaining issue; case dismissed," Crabb wrote in her ruling.

Apple can appeal the judge's decision.

Motorola Mobility said in a statement, ""We're pleased that the court has dismissed Apple's lawsuit with prejudice. Motorola has long offered licensing to our extensive standards-essential patent portfolio at a reasonable and non-discriminatory rate in line with industry standards. We remain interested in reaching an agreement with Apple."

Apple did not respond to an AFP request for comment.







http://au.news.yahoo...ainst-motorola/


#2 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:47

So Apple thought they could control the judge? Lol.

#3 OP Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:48

So Apple thought they could control the judge? Lol.


Well, they do control one judge, and her name is Lucy 'Apple' Koh!

#4 Anibal P

Anibal P

    Neowinian

  • 4,289 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:59

Well, they do control one judge, and her name is Lucy 'Apple' Koh!


They obviously didn't pay this one enough

#5 Eddie7

Eddie7

    Hallo... www.connectw.me

  • 799 posts
  • Joined: 01-December 11
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
  • Phone: 1-800-CALL-ME-MAYBE

Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:13

Did Apple not learn their lesson yet?

http://www.connectw.me



#6 +techbeck

techbeck

    Neowinian Senior

  • 18,692 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 06 November 2012 - 04:00

Lets see what Apple cries about next. Remember, it is only unfair if Apple doesnt get their way. Hope they lose the appeal as well. Maybe they will stop being the bully so much and learn to place nice with others...doubt it but one can hope.