Just got a Wii U, however....


Recommended Posts

Oh yeah, the Wii U specs are nicer and all.... But if you have to wait another 2-3 years for games devs to learn and take advantage of everything, it's a long wait. And for me, current games for the Wii U are meh...

Both X360 and PS3 have huge libraries of good games, and depending on your preference, some games are not available on the PC (Forza, Halo, ...)

I'd say that Kinect is more successful than the PS3 Move, so, that could be a bonus for the X360.

Plenty of responses, but my opinion: You know what you want, Xbox 360, get what you want don't try and convince yourself to settle.

I know! You would think my decision would be easy. But since I started this thread, I've been doing a lot of research. Titles, technology, media capabilities etc. It's made me start to rethink and now I'm stuck in a loop. "The PS3 has some exclusives I really want to play, but there aren't many dance type games. The 360 has lots of titles, multiple dancing games and Kinect so I don't have to wave a wand. The Wii U has some nice titles coming and it does sport that nifty tablet, has some dance games...but the PS3 has games I want to play..."

You get the picture. The other half says I'm too picky ;) I bought a house and moved in last March. I still don't have curtains cause I can't decide on which I like better ;) Lmao

I know! You would think my decision would be easy. But since I started this thread, I've been doing a lot of research. Titles, technology, media capabilities etc. It's made me start to rethink and now I'm stuck in a loop. "The PS3 has some exclusives I really want to play, but there aren't many dance type games. The 360 has lots of titles, multiple dancing games and Kinect so I don't have to wave a wand. The Wii U has some nice titles coming and it does sport that nifty tablet, has some dance games...but the PS3 has games I want to play..."

You get the picture. The other half says I'm too picky ;) I bought a house and moved in last March. I still don't have curtains cause I can't decide on which I like better ;) Lmao

Well there is a few reasons to keep the Wii U First the Wii U does not have a Wand you have to wave around like crazy it does how ever have the option to any of the Wii controlers you want on there games or 3rd party games that support them the main controller is the Wii U gamepad that is included with every Wii U

Wii U is much more powerful and is able to render to 2 separate screens at the same time same content or other the Wii U gamepad does not have a GPU or CPU in it the main console does the rendering

You can play most all Wii U games just on the Wii U gamepad screen while someone else uses the TV you also have other features such as the ability to plug in a 3TB USB external HDD or USB thumb drive for more storage but there is also Nintendo TV Wii U GP also acts as a Fully functional universial remote for your TV and everything

Zombie U E3 dev gameplay still really good video to showcase the Wii U GP

Call of duty black ops 2 review

http://www.ign.com/a...-2-wii-u-review

Zombie U review

http://www.eurogamer...8-zombiu-review

Thank you very much to everyone once again! I spoke to the other half and after discussing pretty much everything that was discussed here, we've decided to hold on the Wii U for now. We can go and get a 360 or a PS3 at anytime as well so we'll just enjoy the Wii for now and try out some of the new stuff heading it's way. :laugh:

Thank you very much to everyone once again! I spoke to the other half and after discussing pretty much everything that was discussed here, we've decided to hold on the Wii U for now. We can go and get a 360 or a PS3 at anytime as well so we'll just enjoy the Wii for now and try out some of the new stuff heading it's way. :laugh:

Well if you guys get Call of duty Black ops 2 for example on the Wii U you will be able to use the Wii U GP to play it while your friend uses the big screen to play it if you do online co op or death match or what ever and hey also you each can play the games on the Wii U GP while the other watches TV or so then neither of you need to worry about shutting the system down so the otehr can sue the TV but yea keep it cause oveer time it will get better and better

when i get one in the near future i am so gonna love the Nintendo TV features as shown in the video above it is gonna kick ass

Well cool. I just hope that it won't freeze up for you. This seems very common. People are having to pull the power plug because it freezes so bad.

I also hope that doesn't happen. If it does, it's going back. *shrug* :) The large update when I first turned it on went surprisingly smooth. However I'm not a fan of WiFi only connection. Might buy a usb to ethernet dongle.

I also hope that doesn't happen. If it does, it's going back. *shrug* :) The large update when I first turned it on went surprisingly smooth. However I'm not a fan of WiFi only connection. Might buy a usb to ethernet dongle.

Well those Freezing issue will soon be fixed but not many have the issue but nintendo is working on it also make note man you can buy a exteral HDD of any size and plug in to the Wii U for storage of downloaded games and such or other stuff . i know when i do get aWii U myself i am looking forward in to using it for are dish DVR and replacement to the dish DVR remote and interface so it shall be great also the facy ya can use it to change settings and imputs on your TV right now hitting the TV button will i think auto detect your TV so ya can use the built in universal remote for the Wii U GP even when the system is off as a seprate feature

Well those Freezing issue will soon be fixed but not many have the issue but nintendo is working on it also make note man you can buy a exteral HDD of any size and plug in to the Wii U for storage of downloaded games and such or other stuff . i know when i do get aWii U myself i am looking forward in to using it for are dish DVR and replacement to the dish DVR remote and interface so it shall be great also the facy ya can use it to change settings and imputs on your TV right now hitting the TV button will i think auto detect your TV so ya can use the built in universal remote for the Wii U GP even when the system is off as a seprate feature

You pick your TV manufacturer from a list. You can do the same with whatever set top (cable television) box you have as well.

It then runs a couple of tests (does power turn on off, does input change the input), and it is set up.

It is incredibly basic, and for my set top box, only does the very basic commands like channel up and down, and I can also open up the guide.

It does no DVR functionality, etc.

So unless I am missing something, it is a very simplistic universal remote.

Hope they expand it down the road to be more of an actual universal remote. That would be great.

You pick your TV manufacturer from a list. You can do the same with whatever set top (cable television) box you have as well.

It then runs a couple of tests (does power turn on off, does input change the input), and it is set up.

It is incredibly basic, and for my set top box, only does the very basic commands like channel up and down, and I can also open up the guide.

It does no DVR functionality, etc.

So unless I am missing something, it is a very simplistic universal remote.

Hope they expand it down the road to be more of an actual universal remote. That would be great.

I think he's referring to TVii which is not actually activated/functional on the Wii U yet. When you open the app it says it's coming in December.

I think he's referring to TVii which is not actually activated/functional on the Wii U yet. When you open the app it says it's coming in December.

yes that is what i was meaning and TVii looks damn kick ass tho and that for one is one reason i want the Wii U so it should be sweet to have

What I personally find about nintendo is their first-party games are excellent, but their third-party games aren't worth bothering about. GC's metroid, mario, zelda, etc. games were great! The DS was just rehashing N64 games for the 18th time or so, the wii's 'new super mario bros' puts a new perspective on mario, one that for me looks awful, but the 2D/3D idea in the paper mario game looked pretty nice. Wii's 3rd party stuff looked like cut-down ports and not worth bothering about. 3DS mario kart looks awesome! But once again, every other game I've seen for the 3DS just looks dire, I can't bring myself to get a 3DS JUST for one game. And when it first came out, nintendo were once again pushing zelda: OoT like it's some new game they haven't released 11 times previously, so they added 3D to it... big whoop....

Since Kinect was released, I've been leaning very heavily to the 360 and have had numerous conversations with my other half with regards to that effect.

I've used Kinect and have seriously almost bought a 360+Kinect on a whim multiple times now.

The kinect, in my experience, is pretty crap. I wouldn't choose a 360 over the WiiU or a PS3 based on the Kinect peripheral. You can see the games and their scores here

If you already are a PC gamers, buying a 360, to me, makes no sense. The 360 is essentially a second, less powerful PC. You can get almost all of the games on 360 for PC. Halo & Forza might be the only games worth having a 360 for. But you may as well keep the Wii U for the Mario/Zelda/Pikman/ZombiU etc. exclusives.

The PS3 has far more exclusives which are actually worth owning it over the 360:

Demon Souls, The God of War games, GT5, Heavy Rain, Ico and shadow of the collosus Collection, Infamous & infamous 2, Killzone 2&3, Littlebigplanet 1& 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, Uncharted 2& 3 (the first was pretty average),

Also, the PS+ service gives you an instant games collection straight away (some bundles come with PS+ subs). You can go home, set it up, set up PS+ and get access to games there and then.

Better off getting a good gaming PC, consoles can't compete.

Which would be a useful answer if the OP was asking about buying a console or building a PC. Also, I think the OP stated that he/she was already a PC gamer.

The kinect, in my experience, is pretty crap. I wouldn't choose a 360 over the WiiU or a PS3 based on the Kinect peripheral. You can see the games and their scores here

If you already are a PC gamers, buying a 360, to me, makes no sense. The 360 is essentially a second, less powerful PC. You can get almost all of the games on 360 for PC. Halo & Forza might be the only games worth having a 360 for. But you may as well keep the Wii U for the Mario/Zelda/Pikman/ZombiU etc. exclusives.

The PS3 has far more exclusives which are actually worth owning it over the 360:

Demon Souls, The God of War games, GT5, Heavy Rain, Ico and shadow of the collosus Collection, Infamous & infamous 2, Killzone 2&3, Littlebigplanet 1& 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, Uncharted 2& 3 (the first was pretty average),

Also, the PS+ service gives you an instant games collection straight away (some bundles come with PS+ subs). You can go home, set it up, set up PS+ and get access to games there and then.

Which would be a useful answer if the OP was asking about buying a console or building a PC. Also, I think the OP stated that he/she was already a PC gamer.

Thanks for the advice. My main reason for wanting Kinect was the amount of dance games available for it. As well as the media capabilities of the 360. I like the fact that I don't have to hold anything in my hand while playing Kinect games etc. Either way, in the end we're keeping the Wii U :)

Either way, in the end we're keeping the Wii U :)

good, I dont think you will be disappointed. Ive had mine since Friday and I am very happy with it. Been playing Mario non-stop and already the ability to play on the gamepad only has come in handy. The Wii U will obviously come down to 3rd party support but for now, there are enough games to keep you busy.

Mine just arrived, downloading the update now.

The gamepad is freaking huge, never seen one in person didn't realise how big it was going to be, ended up going for Basic version, I can't stand glossy black getting fingerprints. I got Nintendoland free with it before anyone laughs at me for paying for it.

wiiu.jpg

Got ZombiU, Skyward Sword and Mario Galaxy 2 coming soon as well.

My condolences..

The truth is right now there isn't. The 3rd party support is not as high as it was with the Wii and the developer tools out for the Wii U are underhanded right now. I would buy a Wii U in like 3-4 years when there's a price cut with actual games you would want to play.

The 360 and or PS3 have established libraries, the 360 having great online media services. If you like the games on another platform more than the Wii U, I suggest you return it and get something you really want.

I learned my lesson to never keep a console hoping some good games would come down the line. The Wii had like 3-4 games I was ever interested in and it wasn't worth the $550 I paid during launch.

3rd party support not as strong as Wii? On a two week old console? BWAHAHAHA. Also, dev tools underhanded? What do you mean by that? Nintendo provided dishonest dev tools to devs? Considering what has been done with the likes of Madden with contracted a contracted dev cycle on an infant platform with a novel control method, I think not. Not quite optimized, yes. Somehow dishonest or unnecessarily difficult to dev for, I doubt it.

360 and PS3 are on the verge of being replaced, the investment into those libraries, if previous entrants haven't been enough to lure your purchase, is unwarranted. I say give the Wii U a chance. Get NSMBU and any other of the 30 launch titles interest you (NSMBU is a must have, though). ACIII is great on the platform, Madden (while missing the infinity engine) is great and makes amazing use of the gamepad. Arkham City is another title that makes great use of the GamePad.

The 360 does have great media features, but nothing that isn't available as well on Wii U (netflix, hulu, amazon instant video, and wiiTV forthcoming) other than Microsoft exclusive properties (as far as online media is concerned, there isn't much, and xbox music, xbox video, and many xbox live enabled games are also available on Windows8)

All in all, make your own choice as to what to do with it, but there is definitely some exciting potential there, and some great launch titles that should keep you busy. Xbox360 is an asesome platform as well, and in my opinion you would be very happy with that as well, but as I said before, it is to be replaced soon. I would keep the Wii U and wait until the next Xbox is released to enter that ecosystem.

  • Like 1

What I personally find about nintendo is their first-party games are excellent, but their third-party games aren't worth bothering about. GC's metroid, mario, zelda, etc. games were great! The DS was just rehashing N64 games for the 18th time or so, the wii's 'new super mario bros' puts a new perspective on mario, one that for me looks awful, but the 2D/3D idea in the paper mario game looked pretty nice. Wii's 3rd party stuff looked like cut-down ports and not worth bothering about. 3DS mario kart looks awesome! But once again, every other game I've seen for the 3DS just looks dire, I can't bring myself to get a 3DS JUST for one game. And when it first came out, nintendo were once again pushing zelda: OoT like it's some new game they haven't released 11 times previously, so they added 3D to it... big whoop....

You would be suprised, the 3d effect in OoT3D is outstanding, and they re-released the game because Zelda games hold up over time, regardless of the graphical detail, because the stories are great and the puzzles are fun and challenging. Also, Resident Evil: Revelations is the most detailed game on any mobile platform currently. The 3DS is actually more powerful than the Wii in many respects and has faster RAM, modern shaders and AA as well as the autostereoscopic 3D effect that creates a slight AA effect itself.

Also, there is an original Zelda coming to the platform, as well as Smash Bros. The LEGO games are all great as well.

Beyond all of that, Nintendo has been doing great things with the eshop, including the ability to digitally purchase and download full 3DS games (some as they are released), virtual console (for classic Zelda, Ninja Gaiden NES, SMB, Kirby's Dreamland, Sega Game Gear games, etc) and eshop exclusives that are also fun.

This is mostly my opinion, BTW. I don't plan on convincing you to do anything other than take another look to see what's come out recently and what's coming.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!