Recommended Posts

PCMag

(I have quoted first half of the article below).

Will Pundits Kill Windows Phone 8?

Windows Phone 8 is only doomed if we say it is. I've been losing patience with the growing meme among pundits that Microsoft's new Windows Phone 8 is a brave try, but not worth recommending because it doesn't have the most popular apps from other platforms.

Yes, that's true, right now. But it may not be true in six months. And those same pundits actually have a lot of control over whether or not it will be true.

App momentum is all about perception and zeitgeist. It's either a positive or negative feedback loop. Microsoft can prime the pump a bit, and it's doing so. If carriers want to absolutely shove a platform at users (as Verizon did with Android), that will also aid adoption. But in general, as long as the platform's SDK is acceptable (which it is), developers will write for a platform if they feel the users are there, and users will come if the developers are there.

That gives pundits an unusual amount of power, because they have some control over perception. If developers and users see everywhere that Windows Phone is up and coming, they'll give it a try - and it'll be up and coming. But if they hear that it's a damp squib because of a lack of apps, they'll stay away, maintaining the lack of apps.

Not Everyone Uses iOS

I've been seeing the "doomed" meme come up recently in the work of influential writers I respect, like David Pogue of the New York Times (unlinkable because of the NYT paywall), Chris Ziegler of the Verge and Todd Hasleton of TechnoBuffalo. They try to couch their words in conditional terms, but their columns all read to me like early obituaries. The underlying tone is that "Windows Phone doesn't have every iPhone game I love right now, so it's worthless."

Against that I'll hold Noah Kravitz's column, "The Windows Phone Problem," which goes more negative on desktop Windows 8 than I prefer, but at least acknowledges that Windows Phone is a solid offering with a fighting chance.

One thing I've noticed is that a lot of these guys tend to be iOS guys, at least to tell from their repeated references to some game called Letterpress. I have a whole half-column written in my head about how sick I am of hearing about this Letterpress thing, which seems to have become some sort of Twitter shibboleth for being a hipster iOS user. But not everyone uses iOS, and not everyone is surrounded by people who use iOS. iOS is vastly overrepresented among geeks and pundits, I suspect. Most Americans aren't suffering from an iOS network effect. Windows Phone doesn't have Letterpress, but it has enough apps to amuse, and if it gets more momentum, other apps will come.

In a nation where only half of the people have smartphones, there's still room for Windows Phone. But it will only survive if people believe there's room for Windows Phone, and that's where the pundits are key.

Some good and valid points IMO.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1122426-will-pundits-kill-windows-phone-8/
Share on other sites

The problem is although competition would be great when it comes to OSes the nature of them are anti-competitive. Similar to how theoretically we can have 20 different phone companies (landlines for the sake of this point) because they can all run a line to our house it is practically impossible due to the extreme costs of running the lines.

People eventually become locked into OSes because they have a huge investment of applications around that OS and not because they love or hate it. This is the biggest problem Windows Phone faces. Microsoft seems to finally be getting it to a point to compete, but the alternative platforms already have a dedicated following in terms of developers. At some point, people will ignore you because the industry is too invested in the competition. Any actual advantages at that point are moot.

Have we reached that point in the mobile race? We're too close to it for me to tell, but it will happen at some point. Just like it happened with PCs and there came a point where Windows mattered so much that no matter how good the competition they couldn't dream of uprooting Windows.

I agree and disagree (with the OP quotes) at the same time.

Windows Phone does looks like a good alternative, but the "lack of apps" is mentioned or bulletted in every review I've read about WP8, the 8X, or the Lumia 920. That kind of consistent "bad press" will undoubtedly have a negative impact on consumer perception. However, what is the pressto do? They have to mention it in order to have a comprehensive review. But, they can't (shouldn't) out-right lie and say the apps are fine.

It's a catch-22 of some sort. The developers won't create apps for a platform with low market share. Market share won't increase until the platform has the apps people want.

In my opinion, developers need to bite the bullet and produce the apps along-side their android/iOS counterparts. If developers are too frugal to do it themselves, then Microsoft needs to incentivise development. Consumers will never be the first party to invest in a new platform. And no change will happen until the relevant parties realize that.

  • Like 2

I agree. I saw a review on The Verge for Apple products where they average a score based on some categories. One of the categories is ecosystem and any Apple product automatically gets a 10. It is completely unfair since the ecosystem isn't actually part of the hardware. And they have a software score as well, I don't see how they can give an 8 to Apple products when they release a broken maps App. Android had a glaring December calendar issue. Can you imagine if Windows Phone 8 had such issues? Would they still rate it an 8?

And they rated the Lumia 920 camera an 8 and the iPad mini an 8. How is this fair? They are saying the iPad mini has a camera just as good as the Lumia's? Seriously?

I just can't understand how the Lumia 920 gets an overall 7.9 and the iPad Mini gets 9.0

It's a real catch 22 problem.. nothing is impossible on the Windows Phone, and all it needs is more developer support. Developers won't bother unless they have customers. Customers won't buy unless the applications are there that they want.

People dismiss "ecosystem" but it's become one of, if not the most important features. Microsoft need to somehow lure developers into working more aggressively on the Windows 8 platform but frankly I don't know what they can do to make it happen. Not sure if some huge week long, free technical seminar and open coding event, for all registered developers at various locations around the world - it would cost them a fortune but would it make them a fortune in applications?

Speaking from my own experience of Windows Phone, whilst the majority of "big" apps I use are now there (Spotify, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter), independent application support is still woeful.. podcast applications for example are a total disaster. The platform really needs a big injection of quality applications.

  • Like 1

I agree. I saw a review on The Verge for Apple products where they average a score based on some categories. One of the categories is ecosystem and any Apple product automatically gets a 10. It is completely unfair since the ecosystem isn't actually part of the hardware. And they have a software score as well, I don't see how they can give an 8 to Apple products when they release a broken maps App. Android had a glaring December calendar issue. Can you imagine if Windows Phone 8 had such issues? Would they still rate it an 8?

And they rated the Lumia 920 camera an 8 and the iPad mini an 8. How is this fair? They are saying the iPad mini has a camera just as good as the Lumia's? Seriously?

I just can't understand how the Lumia 920 gets an overall 7.9 and the iPad Mini gets 9.0

It actually does have comparable issues. The Maps app is absolutely atrocious. Even worse than Apple Maps.

I just love how most reviewers ignore the greater cloud ecosystem question (or why GMail loving monkeys keep reviewing the WP's). Frak apps, MS's cloud ecosystem is the shining centerpiece that few touch on.

Ya, I'm not sure how people discount MicroSoft's ecosystem. Some of it is new but a lot of it is already established.

Xbox Games

Windows Store

Xbox Music/Video

Windows PC

Microsoft web services

Windows Server, Exchange

It's a real catch 22 problem.. nothing is impossible on the Windows Phone, and all it needs is more developer support. Developers won't bother unless they have customers. Customers won't buy unless the applications are there that they want.

People dismiss "ecosystem" but it's become one of, if not the most important features. Microsoft need to somehow lure developers into working more aggressively on the Windows 8 platform but frankly I don't know what they can do to make it happen. Not sure if some huge week long, free technical seminar and open coding event, for all registered developers at various locations around the world - it would cost them a fortune but would it make them a fortune in applications?

Speaking from my own experience of Windows Phone, whilst the majority of "big" apps I use are now there (Spotify, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter), independent application support is still woeful.. podcast applications for example are a total disaster. The platform really needs a big injection of quality applications.

I wonder if anyone realizes that the same can - in fact, should - be said about the WinRT API. (It's even newer than the API for Windows Phone 8, and borrows heavily from it.)

It's something that I have, in fact, been posting about since way back with the Windows 8 Consumer Preview.

The competing ecosystems (iOS and Android) are doing their hardest to suck the developer life away from both the Windows Phone 8 *and* WinRT APIs; they can't afford to target just one OR the other because the Windows Phone and WinRT APIs have too much in common, and even can share development toolboxes. (Haven't the workshops in the last two BUILD conferences shown this?) Android has the biggest problem, as most Android development isn't done ON Android (or even Linux), but on (egad) *Windows*; iOS is relatively safe because iOS development still requires a Mac (or Hack) and thus a contribution to Apple. The punditocracy is feeding into user impatience with a decided degree of malice aforethought because they are realizing the "giant" (Microsoft) is awake - they don't want their beloved Apple and Google ground into flour and baked into bread.

One of the things that will help the apps issue is that Windows 8 apps are pretty easy to port to Windows Phone 8 apps.

This to me is what will fix this issue in the long run.

It works the other way as well.

And the Android and iOS developers are quite aware of this, thank you - it's basically the same paradigm used by Android and iOS.

The last thing they want is for that same paradigm to get ANY sort of success outside the loverly niche they have carved out for themselves.

They are playing up the FUD for all that it's worth.

It's a real catch 22 problem.. nothing is impossible on the Windows Phone, and all it needs is more developer support. Developers won't bother unless they have customers. Customers won't buy unless the applications are there that they want.

People dismiss "ecosystem" but it's become one of, if not the most important features. Microsoft need to somehow lure developers into working more aggressively on the Windows 8 platform but frankly I don't know what they can do to make it happen. Not sure if some huge week long, free technical seminar and open coding event, for all registered developers at various locations around the world - it would cost them a fortune but would it make them a fortune in applications?

Speaking from my own experience of Windows Phone, whilst the majority of "big" apps I use are now there (Spotify, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter), independent application support is still woeful.. podcast applications for example are a total disaster. The platform really needs a big injection of quality applications.

Android doesn't have a tablet ecosystem or at least not much larger than Windows 8 but still I don't see these pundits marking it down for it.

It could just be the "Microsoft hate" tax that every review not by a Microsoft fanboi seems to be attached to reviews of anything Microsoft. It's easy, safe, and pretty much accepted nowadays to downgrade anything made by Microsoft for any issue or slight, perceived or real, while ignoring those same issues that exist on other platforms or from other vendors. This is an unfortunate holdover from the end of the 90s and the turn of the century, but it is what it is. Microsoft will have to simply wow users and accept the fact that getting into ANY area where Apple or Google (or many other companies, for that matter) have a strong product or service will cost them lots of money and take lots of time to get mindshare and marketshare. Simply having an equal or better product won't cut it with the vast majority of the tech press.

That's just my opinion mind you, and worth as much, but I think it's a fairly accurate assessment of things like this.

Interesting point cluberti. I would posit that the tech press is much more important for consumers, but rarely impacts more serious users/decision makers. Thats where MS's gambit for the consumer space has me scratching my head because they are alienating the latter to push the former (and their embracing of BYOD policies). Its a risk.

Riddle me this though, does anyone honestly buy this bull**** peddled by many companies that the reason they aren't developing for WP is simply because of the demographics or market penetration? That entire response to a product backed my MS still doesn't sit right with me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!