This isn't a conspiracy but...


Recommended Posts

Neowin will put it here anyway which makes no sense but I digress.

Everyone remembers this video from my last post...

Well, this is why this topic shouldn't be in this section. The video says that after 9/11 we made the decision to take down governments in the Middle East. We've been in a few already and we are planning to go in a few more.

Now Syria "Has nerve gas" and will use it on their people. Right.

http://www.huffingto...tm_hp_ref=world

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124278-this-isnt-a-conspiracy-but/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is all the Neocon Agenda. Their motives are publicly-stated; they are open about their agenda. Started by Leo Strauss, many have followed his teachings up until today. Cheney, Bush (both), Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, and many others are all Neocons.

The Neoconservatives actually believe that the only way to unite their people (the US population) is by doing away w/ the "evildoers" in other countries. In order words - order out of chaos. They believe that the liberties and freedom that we share are actually corrupting society. So, in order to bring a population together into a cohesive group, they invent enemies where there are none. If you have a constant threat, then that will unite the people and make a stronger nation. There is a fantastic documentary, albeit old now, called '

' which explains the history of the Neocons and their 'evil' counterparts. Oddly enough, the same group of evildoers that the Neocons are trying to abolish believe the same thing. The evildoers believe the only way to unite their people is to do away w/ the corrupted, degenerative Western civilizations.

The Neocons have publicly stated that they want to invade these middle eastern countries, well before 9/11. They used 9/11 as the catalyst for their invasions. They've invaded Afghanistan, Iraq (unjustly), Libya, about to invade Syria, and ultimately Iran. Plus, invading Syria provides a great route into Iran, and Tehran. Plus they keep Turkey as an ally for these reasons. As of early this month, the US has positioned ships and soldiers off the coast of Syria, ready to strike if the Syrian govt intends to use WMD on the people (see here). On top of this, Russia has moved ships into the same area to defend Syria, as they are allies. The Neocons have publicly stated that they intend to topple/invade Iran well over 30 years ago.

Sadly, these are the times we live in. We are currently ruled by the Neocons pushing their agenda. It ultimately wont work, but they sure believe it will.

  • Like 3

And jdawg's answer is why it ends up in the conspiracy forum, people really believe these crazy notions and make all kinds of statements about "neocons" yet we have THE most openly Marxist President in our history as the one pushing for involvement in Syria, even before the election no sane Democrat or Republican wanted to get involved in that mess, only Obama and his staff, and even they were hesitant, because we have no valid reason to get involved in a NATO or UN humanitarian mission but hey keep believing that these invisible "neocons" are the ones pushing for anything involving Syria, the Military is too busy sorting out how and where to make the huge cuts that are pending to come their way to be focused on any other war

Well, this is why this topic shouldn't be in this section. The video says that after 9/11 we made the decision to take down governments in the Middle East. We've been in a few already and we are planning to go in a few more.

Now Syria "Has nerve gas" and will use it on their people. Right.

I don't think it's a conspiracy theory to suggest that 9/11 has been twisted to pursue a political agenda. With regards to Syria, it's no surprise to see the US funding the Syrian rebels through oil money and supplying them with weapons, despite the fact that they've committed terrible atrocities and have links with terrorist organisations. The internal conflicts in Libya and Syria were both supported by the CIA via intermediary parties, typically including Saudi Arabia.

The US is a nation that needs an enemy. That's why fascism moved on to communism, on to terrorism and now against Islam. In order to unite a country you need to create an enemy that threatens to destroy it. The real threat to world security is the US industrial-military complex.

  • Like 1

And jdawg's answer is why it ends up in the conspiracy forum, people really believe these crazy notions and make all kinds of statements about "neocons" yet we have THE most openly Marxist President in our history as the one pushing for involvement in Syria, even before the election no sane Democrat or Republican wanted to get involved in that mess, only Obama and his staff, and even they were hesitant, because we have no valid reason to get involved in a NATO or UN humanitarian mission but hey keep believing that these invisible "neocons" are the ones pushing for anything involving Syria, the Military is too busy sorting out how and where to make the huge cuts that are pending to come their way to be focused on any other war

You obviously don't even have a clue what marxist means.

  • Like 4

You obviously don't even have a clue what marxist means.

Marxism is an economic and sociopolitical worldview and method of socioeconomic inquiry based upon a materialist interpretation of historical development, a dialectical view of social change, and an analysis of class-relations within society and their application in the analysis and critique of the development of capitalism. In the mid-to-late 19th century, the intellectual development of Marxism was pioneered by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxist analyses and methodologies have influenced multiple political ideologies and social movements throughout history. Marxism encompasses an economic theory, a sociological theory, a philosophical method and a revolutionary view of social change. There is no one definitive Marxist theory; Marxist analysis has been applied to a variety of different subjects and has been modified during the course of its development so that there are multiple Marxist theories.

Barack Obama, apparently was a member of a communist party setup, called the Illinois New Party and/or the Chicago New Party, not 100% sure of the accuracy of this.

Barack Obama, apparently was a member of a communist party setup, called the Illinois New Party and/or the Chicago New Party

And what, may I ask, is your issue with communism? Because capitalism doesn't seem to have worked out well at all.

And what, may I ask, is your issue with communism? Because capitalism doesn't seem to have worked out well at all.

I actually don't have an issue with Marxism as form of communism, my sympathies actually always fell on the side of Americans who were treated very badly and persecuted as a matter of course!

The Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 993, also known as the Subversive Activities Control Act or the McCarran Act, after its principal sponsor Sen. Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), is a United States federal law from the McCarthy era. It was enacted over President Harry Truman's veto.

The Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB) was a United States government committee to investigate Communist infiltration of American society during the 1950s Red Scare. It was organized on November 1, 1950, under authority provided in the McCarran Internal Security Act. The original 5 members of the panel were Seth W. Richardson of Washington, D.C., the Board's Chairman, along with Peter Campbell Brown of New York, Charles M. LaFollette of Indiana, David J. Coddaire of Massachusetts, and Dr. Kathryn McHale of Indiana. Mr. Brown later served as Chairman in 1952 and 1953.

Anyone who remotely had a connection with people involved with the communist movement and so called subversive acts were treated as traitors or just about! So no I don't have any problem with it!

I would like to hear you compare RT to Infowars ...

They're both troll "news" with source checking consisting of asking the source a second time" is this true" not even caring who he is. and with a primary goal of spreading conspiratory "news", truth is something neither holds in very high regard.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!