Recommended Posts

http://www.aol.com/video/help-from-beyond-05-wahkan/517577066/?ncid=webmail4

In this episode of Help From Beyond, a strange visitor came to Bella, 15, who was dying from cancer.

One night in her hospital room, the stranger, who called himself Wahkan, brought a cup of ice and said he was her nurse for that night, and told her her time has not yet come.

The next day, the cup of ice was there -- but he had vanished. And, Bella is still here to tell her story ... :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1127498-do-you-beleive-in-miracles/
Share on other sites

Let's imagine that you have cancer and that you are a believer. You pray to God for a cure, you undergo surgery and chemotherapy, and the cancer does in fact go into remission.

What cured you? Was it the chemotherapy, or was it God?

In other words, is there any way to know whether God is playing a role or not when we pray?

The problem is that, in this imagined case, there is ambiguity. The Christian believes that God answered the prayer, but it could also be a simple coincidence.

The way to remove the ambiguity is to say a prayer that cannot be answered by coincidence. For example, instead of praying that God cures one person's cancer, pray that God eliminates all cancer tomorrow. There is only one way for that to happen. God would have to exist, and God would have to reach down from heaven and explicitly work a miracle on earth.

A miracle, to me, would be a cure without any man-made intervention. Once man gets involved and you get cured, it's no miracle..

People have spontaneous remissions without intervention.

If you have a million people with cancer and 1/10 of 1% go into remission that is still 1000 people. If even half of those are religious they'd be inclined to attribute their remission to god/miracles.

Survival chances are dramatically increased by will power alone, where the body is failing but the mind fights willing one on and thats what usually seperates the dead from the survivors in dramatic instances such as plane crashes or ship sinkings.Its the same inner will power that you hear of where people gain super human powers that lift crashed vehicles from on top of their children.

As to the name she used in Native American the meaning of the name Wahkan is Sacred hmmm....rather too much of a coinsidence for me.

If you go by that definition there are no miracles, only things we don't understand.

Certain things that we do not understand still have their roots in science.

The brain for instance. We have very little understanding of how consciousness works bar the bare minimum, however as often as we may say "it's a miracle" we know and realise it isn't actually a miracle as such.

P.S. What's your sig taken from? Looks pretty damn cool.

If you go by that definition there are no miracles, only things we don't understand.

I don't believe in miracles in the supernatural sense. Frankly, considering how many "miracles" people used to believe in and we know understand scientifically, everyone should be very sceptical of such claims. The Vatican itself is now incredibly wary about claiming things are miracles because they've been burned so many times in the past. They say things like "we don't know if X is a miracles, but we do know they happen". Essentially, fraud insurance.

I avoid the word altogether because if you say something is miraculous people think you mean a supernatural miracle as opposed to just using it as a word to describe something highly unlikely or not full understood.

I avoid the word altogether because if you say something is miraculous people think you mean a supernatural miracle as opposed to just using it as a word to describe something highly unlikely or not full understood.

I hear ya. A miracle is too wrapped up in religious dogma. Most people believe a miracle is from god. It just seems whether we call it the unknown or a miracle is just semantics.

I hear ya. A miracle is too wrapped up in religious dogma. Most people believe a miracle is from god. It just seems whether we call it the unknown or a miracle is just semantics.

To those who believe in supernatural miracles, this isn't a semantic issue.

How you define a miracle depends on your perception on life

An unrewarded kindness shown by another

An event that takes one from a clearly losing position to a victory

An unexplainable event that is used to infer a paticular way of life is advantagous

Maybe those who actually believe in miracles should closely examine what has led up to that event and the thought process behind it.

How you define a miracle depends on your perception on life

An unrewarded kindness shown by another

An event that takes one from a clearly losing position to a victory

An unexplainable event that is used to infer a paticular way of life is advantagous

Maybe those who actually believe in miracles should closely examine what has led up to that event and the thought process behind it.

I agree, it's all relative.

The original word expressed in the Bible New Testament as "miracle" in post-modern, secular man's understanding really means a sign.

The traditional definition of a miracle, then, is a sign that God has acted to make himself evident and personal to that person experiencing it. Most 3rd-party observers do treat miracles as circus acts though, especially even Jesus' own race, the (majority of the) Jews who witnessed his ministry.

How do you tell a supernatural miracle from one that's not supernatural?

Don't think you can... or are supposed to. Those who advocate supernaturalism usually claim it is beyond explination and comprehension. Frankly, I'm glad we don't accept that, otherwise we'd still think disease was the result of god's wrath instead of germs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!