Recommended Posts

http://www.aol.com/video/help-from-beyond-05-wahkan/517577066/?ncid=webmail4

In this episode of Help From Beyond, a strange visitor came to Bella, 15, who was dying from cancer.

One night in her hospital room, the stranger, who called himself Wahkan, brought a cup of ice and said he was her nurse for that night, and told her her time has not yet come.

The next day, the cup of ice was there -- but he had vanished. And, Bella is still here to tell her story ... :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1127498-do-you-beleive-in-miracles/
Share on other sites

Let's imagine that you have cancer and that you are a believer. You pray to God for a cure, you undergo surgery and chemotherapy, and the cancer does in fact go into remission.

What cured you? Was it the chemotherapy, or was it God?

In other words, is there any way to know whether God is playing a role or not when we pray?

The problem is that, in this imagined case, there is ambiguity. The Christian believes that God answered the prayer, but it could also be a simple coincidence.

The way to remove the ambiguity is to say a prayer that cannot be answered by coincidence. For example, instead of praying that God cures one person's cancer, pray that God eliminates all cancer tomorrow. There is only one way for that to happen. God would have to exist, and God would have to reach down from heaven and explicitly work a miracle on earth.

A miracle, to me, would be a cure without any man-made intervention. Once man gets involved and you get cured, it's no miracle..

People have spontaneous remissions without intervention.

If you have a million people with cancer and 1/10 of 1% go into remission that is still 1000 people. If even half of those are religious they'd be inclined to attribute their remission to god/miracles.

Survival chances are dramatically increased by will power alone, where the body is failing but the mind fights willing one on and thats what usually seperates the dead from the survivors in dramatic instances such as plane crashes or ship sinkings.Its the same inner will power that you hear of where people gain super human powers that lift crashed vehicles from on top of their children.

As to the name she used in Native American the meaning of the name Wahkan is Sacred hmmm....rather too much of a coinsidence for me.

If you go by that definition there are no miracles, only things we don't understand.

Certain things that we do not understand still have their roots in science.

The brain for instance. We have very little understanding of how consciousness works bar the bare minimum, however as often as we may say "it's a miracle" we know and realise it isn't actually a miracle as such.

P.S. What's your sig taken from? Looks pretty damn cool.

If you go by that definition there are no miracles, only things we don't understand.

I don't believe in miracles in the supernatural sense. Frankly, considering how many "miracles" people used to believe in and we know understand scientifically, everyone should be very sceptical of such claims. The Vatican itself is now incredibly wary about claiming things are miracles because they've been burned so many times in the past. They say things like "we don't know if X is a miracles, but we do know they happen". Essentially, fraud insurance.

I avoid the word altogether because if you say something is miraculous people think you mean a supernatural miracle as opposed to just using it as a word to describe something highly unlikely or not full understood.

I avoid the word altogether because if you say something is miraculous people think you mean a supernatural miracle as opposed to just using it as a word to describe something highly unlikely or not full understood.

I hear ya. A miracle is too wrapped up in religious dogma. Most people believe a miracle is from god. It just seems whether we call it the unknown or a miracle is just semantics.

I hear ya. A miracle is too wrapped up in religious dogma. Most people believe a miracle is from god. It just seems whether we call it the unknown or a miracle is just semantics.

To those who believe in supernatural miracles, this isn't a semantic issue.

How you define a miracle depends on your perception on life

An unrewarded kindness shown by another

An event that takes one from a clearly losing position to a victory

An unexplainable event that is used to infer a paticular way of life is advantagous

Maybe those who actually believe in miracles should closely examine what has led up to that event and the thought process behind it.

How you define a miracle depends on your perception on life

An unrewarded kindness shown by another

An event that takes one from a clearly losing position to a victory

An unexplainable event that is used to infer a paticular way of life is advantagous

Maybe those who actually believe in miracles should closely examine what has led up to that event and the thought process behind it.

I agree, it's all relative.

The original word expressed in the Bible New Testament as "miracle" in post-modern, secular man's understanding really means a sign.

The traditional definition of a miracle, then, is a sign that God has acted to make himself evident and personal to that person experiencing it. Most 3rd-party observers do treat miracles as circus acts though, especially even Jesus' own race, the (majority of the) Jews who witnessed his ministry.

How do you tell a supernatural miracle from one that's not supernatural?

Don't think you can... or are supposed to. Those who advocate supernaturalism usually claim it is beyond explination and comprehension. Frankly, I'm glad we don't accept that, otherwise we'd still think disease was the result of god's wrath instead of germs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!