Jump to content

11 posts in this topic

Posted

[font=lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif]Late last year, the closure of the uber-popular Installous marked the end of a promiscuous era in iOS app piracy. Now, several new services are on the rise that are filling the gap and offering easy installation of pirated apps, even on devices that have not been jailbroken.[/font]

[font=lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif]The two that have risen to the forefront are Zeusmos and Kuaiyong. While the former has been around for a few months, it has gained significant steam since the exit of Installous. The latter has appeared seemingly from nowhere over the past couple of weeks.[/font]

[font=lucida sans unicode,lucida grande,sans-serif]Both of these services are dangerous for app developers because they offer simple, one-tap installs of pirated apps and do not require that devices have been jailbroken in order to do so. This is an enormous problem, as it opens up the arena for their use from the relatively small fraction of users with jailbroken devices

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thats a shame :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I just looked them up and the latter one works on non-jailbroken devices...
How the hell does that work :s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The source says these are just two of the most used, there are more coming up faster than ever :pinch:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Just watched a video of some guy using it on a non-jailbroken device on iOS 6... Starting to make me think iOS really isn't anywhere near as secure as I thought it was :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='n_K' timestamp='1357143379' post='595428386']
Just watched a video of some guy using it on a non-jailbroken device on iOS 6... Starting to make me think iOS really isn't anywhere near as secure as I thought it was :/
[/quote]
me too! I never realised this could be done on non-jailbroken devices! Although I don't agree with what they are doing, you gotta hand it to them that the guys who work these out are really clever and good at what they do.
shame they can't put their talents to better use

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This has less to do with security than with app certification.

These guys abuse the profile certification process, which enables developers to hand out profiles to install beta version of apps that haven't been released to the App Store due to the nature of wanting to only release tested versions to a store and the faster process of delivery.
It's also a method for devs themselves to try their apps.

The fee is due to the need to issue these certificates of which there isn't infinite number I guess (never really looked into that too much).

So they are basically cracking the apps and issuing them like beta versions of their own software to iOS.
It's not really stoppable without cutting deeply into developer's interests to deliver beta versions in a straightforward way.

Some Cydia tweaks can be installed in such a way from alternative stores to unjailbroken devices, although not everything is possible due to the lack of superuser access (so some tweaks won't be able to access APIs and system functions that are locked away from the user mobile as opposed to root), which isn't needed for cracked App Store apps to work btw.
(that would be insane)

Now, jailbroken devices obviously don't need the certificates due to the nature of enabling bypassing the anti-piracy mechanisms directly.

[i]Glassed Silver:win[/i]
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks for the explanation. I was wondering how that worked.

Hypothetically, devs could choose to release their software directly then, and presumably would pay Apple less for the beta certs than the 30% cut?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This has been going on for quite a while now, but now I see it as becoming a serious problem because its being pushed in the spot light. Which means a ton of other people are going to create the same thing and continue until Apple locks things down even more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

vpass appcake etc.. are better alternatives for hacklous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='migo' timestamp='1357220677' post='595430066']
Thanks for the explanation. I was wondering how that worked.

Hypothetically, devs could choose to release their software directly then, and presumably would pay Apple less for the beta certs than the 30% cut?
[/quote]
As I said, it's limited and if I'm not mistaken to create such certificates you need some money.

So no, also devs know that people don't look beyond the App Store for apps.
So if the 30% annoys you, you should be annoyed a lot more by the way lower amount of sales, server costs, more marketing costs, taking a big hit in customer trust (does he/she not release to the App Store for a particular reason?!)

If you're keen on the money, go for the App Store. :)

[i]Glassed Silver:ios[/i]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.