Recommended Posts

In wake of the Newtown, Connecticut Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, a small Connecticut town about 30 miles away, Southington, has started organizing a violent video game buyback program with the intention of destroying them once they have been sold back. Yes, that?s a little reminiscent of a good old-fashioned book burning.

The event being held on January 12 is the product of SouthingtonSOS, a group of Southington organizations like the YMCA, Chamber of Commerce, fire department, and board of education.

Following the Sandy Hook shooting, Joe Erardi, the superintendent of Southington School, said the school received a flood of emails from concerned Southington parents asking how they could help the neighboring Newtown, as well as how they could better protect their children?s school from some kind of similar tragedy. Erardi?s response did lead off with the proper advice of recommending that parents talk to their children about violent video games, as it?s a parent?s responsibility for how their child is raised, rather than the responsibility of, for example, Activision or Square Enix. However, he then directed parents to the video game buyback drive, noting that they?ll receive a $25 gift card for dumping off some violent games.

What?ll happen to those games? Erardi said that the discs will be snapped, thrown in the dumpster, and most likely incinerated, making the event nearly indistinguishable from a book burning.

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1129210-town-plans-video-game-burning/
Share on other sites

If I had to choose between banning guns and banning violent video games, I'd rather ban the violent games. However, I personally see video games as an art form and a form of free speech. There's this organization called the ESRB that rates games so parents know what ages a game is appropriate for. If you buy games rated M for your 12 year old and then he becomes more numb to violence and blood than a normal child should be, then it's your own fault. The ratings are there for a reason. It's good that parents are finally stepping up and doing something, but it would have been nice if they hadn't bought age inappropriate games in the first place, and if 20+ people didn't have to die for them to start caring.

Why do people keep blaming inanimate objects for the actions of a few stupid or malevolent individuals ? Instead they should take responsibility and take time to teach their kids the value of human life and to respect others like they want to be respected. They should take time to make sure their kids are involved in family activities and less in letting the TV or the game console raise the kids. They should be setting the example by acting like good law abiding people and teach them the value of earning the things they get and the importance of hard work instead of giving them everything in their hands for free and without working or at least studying and having good grades for it. I guess it is easier to blame something that can't defend itself than to take responsibility and act like a parent.

  • Like 3

i have been playing video games from the age 13 to now i am 37 yrs old and i do not want to go kill people .

i learned right from wrong from my parents its as simple as that.

ignorant people will always be ignorant.

Yup, blame books, music, tv, movies, games, and anything else they can toss in there. You know, its never the parents fault, media, or the kid to blame. Some people are just messed up but I knew they were going to blame games. It is always one of the number one scape goats.

That's another reason, bad parents who don't accept responsibility for themselves or their children.. AKA horrible people.

Yup, my parents were strict. No rated R movies in the house, PG-13 was questionable, and no violent video games. But I did all of them anyway, and got caught (orig Mortal Kombat for PC/wolf3d), and each time I got the lecture about what was bad with those movies/games.

Guns don't kill people (unless its in a movie or game then they totally kill people) :rofl:

And video games today are fairly tame compared to fallout 1 2 and tactics.

Oh well I commend the town for not going full retard and blaming it on no more mandatory prayer in the schools

Yup, blame books, slasher flicks, more subtle horror movies, music and games......... (Burning plastic disks, yup that'll work. Not to mention the pollution of those gases escaping into the immediate surroundings)

So once, lets say, for arguement sake, you ban everything that could be banned because it might have a negative impact, and these fu**ers still go out on killing sprees, what next?

Edit, come to think of it, can someone reply to me after the event, on how many games were actually returned to be burned?

In wake of the Newtown, Connecticut Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, a small Connecticut town about 30 miles away, Southington, has started organizing a violent video game buyback program with the intention of destroying them once they have been sold back. Yes, that?s a little reminiscent of a good old-fashioned book burning.

The event being held on January 12 is the product of SouthingtonSOS, a group of Southington organizations like the YMCA, Chamber of Commerce, fire department, and board of education.

Following the Sandy Hook shooting, Joe Erardi, the superintendent of Southington School, said the school received a flood of emails from concerned Southington parents asking how they could help the neighboring Newtown, as well as how they could better protect their children?s school from some kind of similar tragedy. Erardi?s response did lead off with the proper advice of recommending that parents talk to their children about violent video games, as it?s a parent?s responsibility for how their child is raised, rather than the responsibility of, for example, Activision or Square Enix. However, he then directed parents to the video game buyback drive, noting that they?ll receive a $25 gift card for dumping off some violent games.

What?ll happen to those games? Erardi said that the discs will be snapped, thrown in the dumpster, and most likely incinerated, making the event nearly indistinguishable from a book burning.

more

Oh why oh why do people always have to be so ignorant. Jesus!

i have been playing video games from the age 13 to now i am 37 yrs old and i do not want to go kill people .

i learned right from wrong from my parents its as simple as that.

ignorant people will always be ignorant.

Well said.

Same goes for me too.

  • Like 1

Looks like a great way to make money and not lose anything. Simply hand over any steam games (of course without the keys) boxes. They can distroy or try to use them but will be useless without the keys while you can redownload the games through the steam client as much as you like. A steam retail game cd is just a way to transport files (for those with slow or no internet connections).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!