Intel to exit traditional desktop mainboards business after Haswell


Recommended Posts

In what will only be interpreted as more evidence of the dawn of the ?Post PC era,? Intel announced today that it will quit the consumer motherboard business after 20 years and end all production and development of mainboards after its next CPU is introduced. The company said it would wind down operations of its Intel Channel Board Division over the next three years with the final new designs released around the company?s upcoming ?Haswell? CPU.

?We disclosed internally today that Intel?s Desktop Motherboard Business will begin slowly ramping down over the course of the next three years,? Intel spokesman Daniel Snyder told Maximum PC today. ?As Intel gradually ramps down its motherboard business we are ramping up critical areas of the desktop space including integration of innovative solutions for the PC ecosystem such as reference design development, NUC, and other areas to be discussed later.

Intel to Quit Making Motherboards

And well, this is actually fair. I've read some people saying that the Intel boards aren't as good or full-featured as their counterparts from other vendors.

More power to ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, etc. I guess

Intel is also the higher-priced brand - even compared to ASUS (which isn't exactly cheap).

If you look at Intel motherboards compared to other brands, even where components are not merely similar, but identical, Intel is often NOT the bargain choice. (That is also why I have NEVER - and in ever - bought an Intel-branded motherboard.)

It's not that Intel doesn't make good motherboards; they do. Intel's branded motherboards are still the corporate standard because they are reference-standard-grade - fancy they are NOT.

The problem is that Intel lacks any sort of advantage (except in terms of perception) to the AIBs (even in the Intel-CPU space) - Intel has been an afterthought except when Intel is specified.

It's like prescription drugs - generics cost less; therefore, generics are preferred where possible, not just by insurers, but even by doctors.

Still, this has been touted before (in fact, way back after Intel was forced to shelve the original 820R chipset due to the debacle with RAMBUS) - yet Intel has survived (including their branded-motherboard business).

However, there will doubtless be some reason why the Intel-branded motherboard can soldier on (didn't Intel, in fact, start pushing their branded motherboards through MicroCenter - which they had NOT been doing?).

well, as someone who tried Intel Motherboards,

I can confidently say they are "averages" in performances,

yet a bit more expensive than other vendors motherboards which offer similar performances or better at lesser cost.

even know i still can't quite fathom why its more expensive?

this quiting moves probably causes by Intel's foiled plan (due public pressures),

which said want to abandon socketed CPU and release BGA chips only.

...and an unrelated news: AMD just won another customer.

And the award for not reading the article goes to you. AMD doesn't make motherboards

When it comes to motherboards, I only turned to Intel for dual socket server boards.

To a PC enthusiast, Intel's workstation boards were never appealing because of the company's grudge against over-clockers.

yes

That's a logical conclusion considering they're not making motherboards anymore. :laugh:

It's a shame we can't downvote things on this forum... anyway, the only "bad" thing about this is Intel definitely offered budget motherboards that could be found in bundles on the cheap which were a nice option for a basic home computer. But, I'm sure someone will fill that void pretty quickly.

This won't be a big deal to enthusiasts and PC gamers because the vast majority of them buy non-Intel motherboards. I have seen some good Intel motherboards though. Contrary to what some people might believe, Intel made high-end motherboards (which were oddly overpriced compared to their third-party counterparts).

Contrary to what some people might believe, Intel made high-end motherboards (which were oddly overpriced compared to their third-party counterparts).

I don't know that high end is the right word, in all cases. They made some high end boards, they made a lot of very reliable reference boards, and they seemed to be universally expensive unless you could get a deal on them. It was similar to what ATi did when they were still making cards.

I really don't like the thought of desktop users becoming 'enthusiasts' again. Just seems like prices will go up.

Tablets and touch are great, but nothing beats a Desktop and its power for your main hub of control over everything.

I don't see this as being the dawn of the "post PC era" at all, Intel are simply stopping motherboard manufacture because it was never really an overly large business for them and it's probably reached a time at which it's worth their time to focus on other things.

So Intel will still make the sockets and CPU's, yes ?

of course, just not their own motherboards anymore (which were never the greatest mobos anyway)
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!