Military Plane? (911)


Recommended Posts

I believe the numerous witnesses.

You are quite right in thinking that no American Airliner hit the twin towers.

In fact 2 of the supposed destroyed jets were still listed as being in service, 2 years after '9-11'.

You can find an original 'live' video on-line, that shows that no plane at all hit the one tower -- a plane was edited in later.

There are any number of inconsistencies and mysteries connected to this 'terrorism'.

9-11 is a shameful fraud committed on the citizens to further the power and control of the hidden 'government'.

And in spite of what the sheep think, it does not take an army of people to pull off such a staged event.

:ermm:

  • Like 3

i also heard that Aliens did it....or i read it on the internet, so it must be true..

Go figure, i always thought this was done by terrorist, now i see that the illuminati must of have been behind this, with help of their alien friends. Wait wait wait! i saw a new video, it was said that a man on a red sled with reindeer pulling him was the cause of 911!!! OMFG!!!!

Oh dear. I love the huge jump in logic from omg its a military plane to, its clearly an unmanned drone plane.

a lot of people were looking at the plane from underneath, they don't usually put decals or colours on the underside of the plane, let alone being able to see them going at hundreds of MPH.

gallery3-6.jpg

post-1442-0-65531300-1359556036.jpg

Looks very similar, but no its clearly a military plane /s

Oh dear. I love the huge jump from omg its a military plane to, its clearly an unmanned drone plane.

a lot of people were looking at the plane from underneath, they don't put decals or colours on the underside of the plane, let alone being able to see them going at hundreds of MPH.

You were not there so thats pretty much invalid. The plane was flying really low so obviously some people had to see it close.

i also heard that Aliens did it....or i read it on the internet, so it must be true..

Go figure, i always thought this was done by terrorist, now i see that the illuminati must of have been behind this, with help of their alien friends. Wait wait wait! i saw a new video, it was said that a man on a red sled with reindeer pulling him was the cause of 911!!! OMFG!!!!

I counted so far 2 intelligent replies. Zinomian, you are a complete Dumb*** for your childish comment. I ask for opinions on the video. You failed at the simplest task ever.

I came across this video today on YouTube that I havent seen. A bunch of witnesses explain what they saw. Please do not bash for the love of god. I just want to know your opinion about what the witnesses said. This is NO debate!

As legendofmart said.. all of the witnesses on the ground are not going to be able to see the red/blue American Airlines logo/stripe while looking at the underside of the plane. How would you explain the air traffic controllers who saw the plane/call sign disappear from their radar at the exact time the planes hit?

You were not there so thats pretty much invalid. The plane was flying really low so obviously some people had to see it close.

I counted so far 2 intelligent replies. Zinomian, you are a complete Dumb*** for your childish comment. I ask for opinions on the video. You failed at the simplest task ever.

Actually, your post is sooooooo damm stupid and ignorant and just weird and dumb and anything bad you can say about a post, that my reply is the best i can do considering A. The poster, B. The post itself, and C. the information on the post.

You sir, need help.

....and you were there?

Take a look at the pics I posted.

No but I rather listen to a wittiness's testimony. That image is horrible to even to use. I think people can see better than that.

Actually, your post is sooooooo damm stupid and ignorant and just weird and dumb and anything bad you can say about a post, that my reply is the best i can do considering A. The poster, B. The post itself, and C. the information on the post.

You sir, need help.

61 post count... yeah you contribute a lot here. :rolleyes:

No but I rather listen to a wittiness's testimony. That image is horrible to even to use. I think people can see better than that.

Just look at the freaking pics, you can see the blue underneath and the red line, that was taken just before the plane hit the tower.

It is CLEARLY the same kind of type and colouring.

Guess that doesn't fit your crackpot theory though that's why you are dismissing it.

61 post count... yeah you contribute a lot here. :rolleyes:

I'd rather have 61 posts than your 1,412 ridiculous conspiracy theory posts and posts calling people names just because they don't agree with your daft theories.

No but I rather listen to a wittiness's testimony. That image is horrible to even to use. I think people can see better than that.

61 post count... yeah you contribute a lot here. :rolleyes:

Then imagine how moronic and stupid your post is to actually make ME post a response!!! :argh:

As legendofmart said.. all of the witnesses on the ground are not going to be able to see the red/blue American Airlines logo/stripe while looking at the underside of the plane. How would you explain the air traffic controllers who saw the plane/call sign disappear from their radar at the exact time the planes hit?

Well still someone had to see it from a closer range. From a building, who knows. About your second comment I really dont know what to say since there are a lot of things we still dont know about.

incidentally, the plane was in fact so low, that it was moving so fast relative to the people on the ground they wouldn't have seen anything but a dark plane shaped shadow.

and yeah, it looks like a UA civilian air plane, nothing else.

And yes you would need an army of people to cover something like this up. and remember, nothing is secret if more than one person knows. and the chance of a leak increases exponentially with every new person.

Remember you'd have to have the pilots in on it, all the people who killed all the civilians without a trace that they where killed before time as no one knew the towers would fall. and if you assume the fall is part of it, then you need a full team of demolition experts, the people who called and SMS'ed from the planes... and the list goes on.

Seriously, if you think this was a staged conspiracy thing, then you need to look up a lot of real facts, and realize that they didn't accomplish what they wanted anyway and never would have.

Then imagine how moronic and stupid your post is to actually make ME post a response!!! :argh:

Done yet?

Just look at the freaking pics, you can see the blue underneath and the red line, that was taken just before the plane hit the tower.

It is CLEARLY the same kind of type and colouring.

Guess that doesn't fit your crackpot theory though that's why you are dismissing it.

I'd rather have 61 posts than your 1,412 ridiculous conspiracy theory posts and posts calling people names just because they don't agree with your daft theories.

Agree?? I said this wasnt a debate. A lot of witnesses talk about the explosions as well. Why comment on one thing?

Well still someone had to see it from a closer range. From a building, who knows. About your second comment I really dont know what to say since there are a lot of things we still dont know about.

and the ones who saw it said it was a UA airliner.

the problem is that peopel close on the ground would see nothing but a blur, people in nearby buildings would see nothing but a blur. people far enough for the planes to move slow enough relatively to see it, would be to far away. The plane was also hidden behind buildings for most people, and they wheren't exactly looking for the damn thing.

Done yet?

Agree?? I said this wasnt a debate. A lot of witnesses talk about the explosions as well. Why comment on one thing?

Sorry didn't realise you ran Neowin.

This is a discussion forum, for someone who talks a lot about conspiracies and truth you sure do like to try and keep people quiet if it doesn't fit your agenda.

incidentally, the plane was in fact so low, that it was moving so fast relative to the people on the ground they wouldn't have seen anything but a dark plane shaped shadow.

and yeah, it looks like a UA civilian air plane, nothing else.

And yes you would need an army of people to cover something like this up. and remember, nothing is secret if more than one person knows. and the chance of a leak increases exponentially with every new person.

Remember you'd have to have the pilots in on it, all the people who killed all the civilians without a trace that they where killed before time as no one knew the towers would fall. and if you assume the fall is part of it, then you need a full team of demolition experts, the people who called and SMS'ed from the planes... and the list goes on.

Seriously, if you think this was a staged conspiracy thing, then you need to look up a lot of real facts, and realize that they didn't accomplish what they wanted anyway and never would have.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loCPimNI5JY My reply to it being staged. I find it interesting how you said look up the real facts when people werent allow to question the official story and avoided talking about it as much as possible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loCPimNI5JY

My reply to it being staged. I find it interesting how you said look up the real facts when people werent allow to question the official story and avoided talking about it as much as possible.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html

Sorry didn't realise you ran Neowin.

This is a discussion forum, for someone who talks a lot about conspiracies and truth you sure do like to try and keep people quiet if it doesn't fit your agenda.

Not sure where I said I ran neowin... hmmm... I really dont talk about this often. So I find it weird how you seem to know everywhere i post. I didnt ask for a debate and I guess its too hard for people like you to pay attention and learn to follow directions.

Again, this is a discussion forum, people will talk about what they want to talk about you can't just say "NO DEBATE" and then expect people not to debate it. What did you expect when you posted your silly conspiracy theories.

Why not go to a conspiracy theory site like infowars where people actually care.......

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!