FREE 354 day Bitdefender Internet Security 2013!


Recommended Posts

http://www.av-test.o...res/award/2012/

http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_sum_201212_en.pdf - av-comparitives product of the year 2012

January 2013 | CEO Andreas Clementi, AV-Comparatives

The achievement crowns a year of accolades and awards, including PC Mag's Editor's Choice, distinctions from reviewers such as CNET, Laptop Magazine, PC PRO, WebUser, PC Achat and Micro Actuel.

is-2013.png

Great moments are best when shared ?and friends should always be there

Spread the cheer to your friends with three Bitdefender Internet Security 2013 licenses. Let?s all celebrate together!

DOWNLOAD (2.3mb): http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/11KJONV4/bitdefender_isecurity.exe_links

or:

http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/BitDefender-Internet-Security-Download-42399.html (choose mirror 1)

LICENCE KEYS: bd2012-s.gifQ5YW7GP or 3NVQXKI

The license keys must be activated within 30 days.

This works btw, here is my screenshot:

16bh6yh.png

I don't know when this offer ends but i suspect it is about to go viral so be QUICK!

Bitdefender finishes 1st-3rd in nearly all antivirus tests on av-comparatives.org and av-test.org along with kaspersky, those are the 2 best despite many of you championing nod32.

  • Like 1

Oh my. I recently installed Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2013 on my brother's laptop with a license key that expires in 677 days. I wonder if he can use this instead for 365 days and use the anti-virus software for the remaining 312 days.

Oh my. I recently installed Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2013 on my brother's laptop with a license key that expires in 677 days. I wonder if he can use this instead for 365 days and use the anti-virus software for the remaining 312 days.

lol, i'm afraid not, when i went to install internet security it asked me whether i wanted to use the 677 day serial or use a new serial. Internet security gives you a nice firewall though: http://www.bitdefender.co.uk/solutions/antivirus-comparison.html

Anyone know how this compares to MSE?

It DESTROYS it :p Any paid antivirus destroys MSE, look at the reviews i linked in the 1st post.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

You clearly didn't read the 2 antivirus test website reviews otherwise you would see that MSE scores very poorly.

Bitdefender: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/tests/test-reports/?tx_avtestreports_pi1%5Breport_no%5D=124551

vs

MSE: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/tests/test-reports/?tx_avtestreports_pi1%5Breport_no%5D=124558

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

I don't run anything else and my system is clean. MSE just works. I ran BitDefender. Eset and Kaspersky before and something has always found it's way through. ClamWin AV is much better, or used to be, then Eset and other paid AVs also. If MSE wasn't around, I would be using ClamWin.

You clearly didn't read the 2 antivirus test website reviews otherwise you would see that MSE scores very poorly.

I don't care what those reviews say. I use what works and MSE does the job.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

You're dreaming. MSE isn't as bad as some. And just because a product is paid, doesn't mean it's better. But MSE is not all that great. Sorry to tell you that. I've seen MANY infections that others have caught.

I hope you can ignore false positives because you couldn't in their free product. :(

not sure, unfortunately you can't with avira internet security which is what i used until today. I could choose ignore but minutes later it would detect a keygen as a virus again, it was a pain, other than that i liked avira.

Yeah, I just excluded various folders with MSE but was shocked when I couldn't ignore things that were caught but were false positives with Bitdefender Free. But, I have heard good reviews so I'm excited to try this out.

fixed the link now, posted the internet security installer, the keys i posted are correct for the internet security installer.

MODERATORS, please can you delete the posts that say "delete me" and the ones talking about incorrect serials and links as i've fixed the links in the 1st post now, thanks.

Done. (Y)

You're dreaming. MSE isn't as bad as some. And just because a product is paid, doesn't mean it's better. But MSE is not all that great. Sorry to tell you that. I've seen MANY infections that others have caught.

I agree that just because a product is paid for doesn't mean it's better. But since I have been running MSE and now Defender under Win8, I have only had 1 infection and that was ehen MSE was in beta stage.

When added key to my account, saw clearly that it was identified as : Bitdefender Internet Security 2013

Subscription

365 days left

When I added the key it shows that I have 354 days left on the webpage. But it doesn't show in the actual program.

When added key to my account, saw clearly that it was identified as : Bitdefender Internet Security 2013

Subscription

365 days left

OP has posted the correct link for the correct installer now so yea the keys will work...

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

You shouldn't run two AVs, but I agree. I still suggest MSE as an "At least use this" kind of thing, but it's definitely not as good as it was a year or two ago. Back then it had detection rates with the best of them, now it's definitely towards the mid to bottom of the pack.

You shouldn't run two AVs, but I agree. I still suggest MSE as an "At least use this" kind of thing, but it's definitely not as good as it was a year or two ago. Back then it had detection rates with the best of them, now it's definitely towards the mid to bottom of the pack.

I know, and I typically don't otherwise. They just seem to work great in conjunction with each other though without any pre-configuration for this to work.

I may just dump both for BitDefender though, but we'll see I guess. It's gonna be hard to get away from MBAM since it's done such an incredible job over the years.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!