Jump to content



Photo

Battlefield 4

official battlefield ea dice fps gaming

1031 replies to this topic

#16 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:53

I would. Maybe they could make a multiplayer only version for $10-15 less. A man can dream.

I am suddenly remembering Brink =) Of course, now that I can play Brink on my connection, noone else is o.o


#17 +Chicane-UK

Chicane-UK

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,036 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 01
  • Location: The UK!
  • OS: MacOS 10.10 Yosemite
  • Phone: Google Nexus 4

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:55

I was hoping to see some of the multiplayer as that's all I play of Battlefield 3.. I'm sure I'll end up buying this but not sure I can be bothered with pre-ordering.

And yes I would pay for a multiplayer-only version of the game with the single player element stripped out!

#18 trag3dy

trag3dy

    Neowinian Senior

  • 7,235 posts
  • Joined: 03-March 05
  • Location: USA

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:04

I am suddenly remembering Brink =) Of course, now that I can play Brink on my connection, noone else is o.o


Fair point. But I should also point out that Counterstrike 1.6 was and still is the most competitive fps game ever played and it had 0 single player campaign (if you don't count HL1). And then most of the older Battlefield games all were without any sort of single player.

There are two sides to that coin. Of course if they chose not to make a campaign that doesn't necessarily mean the multiplayer would be better as well, I'm willing to concede that point.

#19 TheLegendOfMart

TheLegendOfMart

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,281 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 01
  • Location: England

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:08

Why are people whining about single player, they have to include it to combat CoD, BF2 could afford not to have SP because CoD4:MW wasn't out back then.

#20 Xerxes

Xerxes

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,345 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 04
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Win8.1, OSX 10.10
  • Phone: Galaxy S4 LTE-A

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:09

Single player campaign. Why waste your time DICE? It will be just as forgettable as BF3's. No one buys battlefield games for single player. :pinch:

One thing that looks noticeably improved are explosions and smoke though. It's hard to say what else has changed since BF3 from the video.


I did :laugh: it wasn't bad [BF3], but not worth the money if your not interested in the multiplayer (which I'm not). I won't be making the same mistake again with BF4 though!

#21 +MikeChipshop

MikeChipshop

    Miniman

  • 8,310 posts
  • Joined: 02-October 06
  • Location: Scotland
  • OS: Windows 8, iOS, Android, WP8
  • Phone: HTC 8X / Nexus 5

Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:20

Looks great and i'm looking forward to it. Graphics and engine look vastly improved and hopefully they'll have taken on a few of the flaws of BF3, which was a fantastic game.
We all know a lot of the team work intricacies were removed from BF3 but that aside, it was still plain awesome.

Looking forward to some multi-player footage.

#22 0nyX

0nyX

    Posting from Apple //c

  • 1,207 posts
  • Joined: 07-April 09
  • Location: C:\Users\OnyX

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:08

Looks great but i dont know abt the single player.Maybe it should have been like BF2 single player which is in reality offline multiplayer with bots.

#23 TheLegendOfMart

TheLegendOfMart

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,281 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 01
  • Location: England

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:11

What have they done to the epic DUNDUNDUN DUN DUN DUN from BF3, just BRRRRRRRRRRZZZZZZRZRZZRZZZZZZZDUNDUNDUNZZZZZZZZZZRRRZZZZZZZRZZZZZZ in BF4.

BF3 BF4

#24 the better twin

the better twin

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,725 posts
  • Joined: 26-January 10
  • OS: Win 8
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:46

Story looks completely uninteresting. Hard to get excited about this after BF3 which wasnt great.
Looks more like an updated B3. I would rather it had more development time and was next gen only rather than cross gen as im sure they would be able to do more if they didnt have the woeful specs of the PS3 and Xbox 360 holding them back.

#25 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:51

Story looks completely uninteresting. Hard to get excited about this after BF3 which wasnt great.
Looks more like an updated B3. I would rather it had more development time and was next gen only rather than cross gen as im sure they would be able to do more if they didnt have the woeful specs of the PS3 and Xbox 360 holding them back.

BF3 for the 360/PS3 was notably different from the PC ver. I'm rather curious if the differences are greater this time.

We shall see.

#26 P.M.K

P.M.K

    Digital Mind Control

  • 2,441 posts
  • Joined: 01-June 05
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: HTC One M8

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:01

this should be a service-pack/patch not a new game.


No it shouldn't.

Flog.

#27 Crisp

Crisp

    To infinity and beyond

  • 5,529 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:20

Terrible.

#28 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:45

I'm gonna need a new vidcard this year. Right on.

#29 chaosinfected

chaosinfected

    Catgirl

  • 6,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-October 03
  • OS: 10 x64

Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:07

That's what i was thinking. My 560ti isnt going to cut it anymore.

Loan me some money for the titan? :p

haha yeah that's gonna happen...I'm still runnin a 6870. planning to wait for the 8xxx series but who knows when that's going to happen or what it's going to cost

#30 Dane

Dane

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,902 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 03
  • Location: PA, USA

Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:14

I'll wait. if they say later on, that it will be out for the new xbox, i'll get it. if not, then i'll wait.