Google changes how it measures Android version adoption, sees uptick in Jel


Recommended Posts

Google changes how it measures Android version adoption, sees uptick in Jelly Bean devices

Google routinely gives monthly numbers breaking out the adoption of various versions of Android, but the company has now changed the way it calculates those numbers ? providing a distinctly different portrait of the Android ecosystem in the process. As outlined on the Android Developers site, Google now uses the data collected when users visit the Google Play Store; under the previous system, any check-in to the store by the device would have been incorporated into the results, user-generated or not. The new system went into effect starting with this month's results.

The change essentially skews the results towards those users who are actively visiting the Play Store. Google says as much on the page itself, noting that the new system "more accurately reflects those users who are most engaged in the Android and Google Play ecosystem." To be fair, however, it is those same users that Android developers should arguably be focusing on in the first place, since they're more likely to discover or purchase an app.

Unsurprisingly, the new data collection tactic results in a landscape of Android users that are more current than what was described just one month ago. Jelly Bean accounts for 25 percent of the devices out there ? up from 16.5 percent in March's results. The other numbers saw less dramatic shifts; Ice Cream Sandwich was on 29.3 percent of devices in the new figures (up less than a percentage point from the prior month), while Gingerbread users dropped from 44.2 percent to 39.8 percent.

While adoption of new versions of Android has been on the rise ? last month Android 4 variants overtook Gingerbread for the first time? it's not clear whether the change in the Jelly Bean numbers here is sheer adoption, the change in the way the data is calculated, or a combination of both. Future numbers should provide additional insight, but one thing is certain: the days when the Android ecosystem was reliant on version 2.3 appear to finally be fading away.

post-1302-0-22599300-1364973177.png

Source: The Verge

The sad part is actually the manufacturers that don't send much updates. the whole point of using android, except the sharing of an App store, was to be upgradeable by google as it's standard code. instead end up the same as a closed source OS that got stuck on that device until you trash and get a new one.

We could talk about rooting it, but the majority of the people don't even know what's that, nor they would even bother doing it, so it's not a real option.

  • Like 2

It's great that Android is open source but its only hurting the OS in the long run, there are brand new phones being released today with low resolution, slow cpu and gpu, hardly any memory still running Gingerbread, I don't like closed platforms but there is something to be said about how Microsoft and Apple run things, their phones have a guaranteed level of performance and quality.

It's great that Android is open source but its only hurting the OS in the long run, there are brand new phones being released today with low resolution, slow cpu and gpu, hardly any memory still running Gingerbread, I don't like closed platforms but there is something to be said about how Microsoft and Apple run things, their phones have a guaranteed level of performance and quality.

And a nice price tag to boot (Apple anyway).

The sad part is actually the manufacturers that don't send much updates. the whole point of using android, except the sharing of an App store, was to be upgradeable by google as it's standard code. instead end up the same as a closed source OS that got stuck on that device until you trash and get a new one.

We could talk about rooting it, but the majority of the people don't even know what's that, nor they would even bother doing it, so it's not a real option.

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

Nexus devices. Always updated first.

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

You get a few more features and such with 4.1 but for me it's wasn't that big of an upgrade. Got a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 running 4.1.2

Still stuck with 4.0.4 thanks to Sprint on my GSII. Planning to root my phone but I barely have time for anything as it is. They promised an updated at the end of December, then pushed to February, then March... then LATE March. Now it's April lol...

I love Android and probably wouldn't switch to anything else, but this is friggin stupid.

HTC/Bell Canada have left my device on 4.0.3

Probably going to cut both the phone (and Bell) in the summer and buy a WP8 device outright.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • https://www.tenforums.com/tuto...b-results-windows-10-a.html Check the comment dates. Some of them are as old as 2016.
    • I wonder how many are laid off for cost savings, and this being blamed on AI to make it sound less scary and bad, for a more positive "modern, with the times" spin for investors? Because Oracle is down 14% the past year. We're looking at a company struggling here. If AI would actually be working out so well for them that they can do massive layoffs, surely this would've been reflected the past year in their stock value?
    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!