Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Are you stealing content if you have an ad blocker?||
|Isla Vista rampage victims remembered||
|How much would you pay for the "Surface Mini" ?||
|Have you retired your last-gen consoles?||
|Is Windows 10 faster or more optimized than 8?||
Posted 20 May 2013 - 03:57
Posted 20 May 2013 - 04:17
Posted 22 May 2013 - 20:37
Posted 22 May 2013 - 20:56
Posted 22 May 2013 - 21:10
Posted 22 May 2013 - 21:13
I use 24 512GB SSDs in RAID 6 arrays for primary storage.
Then 12 4TB drives in RAID 6 for primary and offsite backup storage.
Posted 22 May 2013 - 21:21
RAID ≠ Backup
This would be the first item I would address and IF I was to attempt to use RAID as an almost real-time solution, I would not use RAID in 5 or 10 BUT IF you must due to the other benefits than the obvious choice would be RAID 10.
At my home, I do in fact use a RAID to over-come single points of failure but I also have snap-shots of the hard drive being captured, this way - IF a moment of craziness was to occur with data loss, the RAID would be effected by my snap shot would not.
*Some thoughts to consider*
Posted 23 May 2013 - 04:42
Posted 24 May 2013 - 04:36