Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 +V-Tech

V-Tech

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,060 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 05
  • Location: 127.0.0.1
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Nexus 5

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:15

4k-screen-front619.jpg

 

If you're yearning for a super high res HDTV and the usual suspects' products are just a bit too pricey, there's a new challenger about to join: China's TCL. Its fall lineup of televisions leads with a 50-inch 4K model (shown above) due in September priced at just $999. It joins Seiki as a Chinese manufacturer bringing budget priced Ultra HD panels to the US with this 120Hz edge lit LED model that packs 4 HDMI inputs with MHL support. If the 7E504D's 3,840 x 2,160 resolution screen isn't a must-have for you, it does have some more traditional HDTVs on the way in the form of its 5510 series.
 
They include 40-, 46- and 55-inch 1080p models, priced at $399, $499 and $799, respectively. The largest one includes built-in WiFi with Smart TV features including Netflix, YouTube and Yahoo Apps, and all go on sale in August. So far, reviews of the Seiki UHDTVs have suggested resolution isn't everything even at these prices (and especially at this screen size) -- we'll be waiting to see if TCL's scaling, contrast, motion processing and other qualities can match up with the big guys.

 

 

 



#2 Tony.

Tony.

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,984 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 05
  • Location: Liverpool, UK
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:21

Only a matter of time before a price war on 4k TV's happen. Earlier the better :D



#3 ahhell

ahhell

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,896 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:21

Who the hell is TCL?   :s



#4 Astra.Xtreme

Astra.Xtreme

    Electrical Engineer

  • 8,049 posts
  • Joined: 02-January 04
  • Location: Milwaukee, WI

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:31

Who the hell is TCL?   :s

I've never heard of them either, but the reviews online actually seem pretty decent.  There are some people that say their TV died quickly, but I guess you'll find those sort of reviews for every TV.  Some people said that the TV itself is a Samsung, but branded as a TCL.  Not sure if that applies to their whole lineup though.

 

I was expecting people would review their products as cheap junk, but I'm honestly surprised that it seems to be a decent brand. Amazingly cheap too.



#5 +Nik L

Nik L

    Where's my pants?

  • 34,010 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 03

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:37

Who the hell is TCL?

 

Rewind 20 years and say the same about HTC



#6 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,403 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 25 July 2013 - 13:59

Rewind 20 years and say the same about HTC


HTC was only called HTC in one region then. I European it was QTek.

Anyway, good user reviews mean to thing when it comes to such TVs regular users couldn't tell the difference between a 4 and 8 series Samsung if you pointed it out to them.

#7 Rudy

Rudy

    Neowinian Senior

  • 22,404 posts
  • Joined: 30-September 01
  • Location: Ottawa, On

Posted 25 July 2013 - 14:33

I'm waiting for a 27-32" 4K display with DisplayPort or Mini DisplayPort at around $1000-1500, once one comes out I'm buying it right away



#8 jerzdawg

jerzdawg

    Neowinian

  • 5,341 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 02
  • Location: new jersey

Posted 25 July 2013 - 16:56


Anyway, good user reviews mean to thing when it comes to such TVs regular users couldn't tell the difference between a 4 and 8 series Samsung if you pointed it out to them.

This.. you are not going to get the same picture quality you are going to get from the Sony 4k tvs.  You will get a tv that is capable of 4k spec but I'd imagine the PQ to be on par with other low end models.



#9 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 16,127 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 25 July 2013 - 17:05

Does anyone know whether it will accept a native 120Hz input or if just applies signal processing to a 60Hz input? I'm interested in getting a 4K display but I really don't want to be limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, as otherwise I might as well stick with my IPS display.



#10 vcfan

vcfan

    Doing the Humpty Dance

  • 4,780 posts
  • Joined: 12-June 11

Posted 25 July 2013 - 17:11

Rewind 20 years and say the same about HTC

wait 20 more months and they'll be saying the same thing again



#11 ahhell

ahhell

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,896 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 25 July 2013 - 17:45

I'm waiting for a 27-32" 4K display with DisplayPort or Mini DisplayPort at around $1000-1500, once one comes out I'm buying it right away

 

4k is only really useful for huge displays 60"+.  Just like 1080p is a bit useless for TVs under 40".  Running 4k resolution on a 27" monitor would ludicrous.  The mouse pointer would be a speck.



#12 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,403 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 25 July 2013 - 19:22

Does anyone know whether it will accept a native 120Hz input or if just applies signal processing to a 60Hz input? I'm interested in getting a 4K display but I really don't want to be limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, as otherwise I might as well stick with my IPS display.

 

Why does this matter for a TV. these are TV's not monitors. even for a monitor I don't see why you would need more than 60 except for 3D. 


4k is only really useful for huge displays 60"+.  Just like 1080p is a bit useless for TVs under 40".  Running 4k resolution on a 27" monitor would ludicrous.  The mouse pointer would be a speck.

 

Large mouse pointer....



#13 Lord Method Man

Lord Method Man

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,675 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 12
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 1520

Posted 25 July 2013 - 19:24

Why does this matter for a TV. these are TV's not monitors. even for a monitor I don't see why you would need more than 60 except for 3D. 

 

You can't display native 24 fps content (i.e. movies) on a 60 Hz display without 3:2 pulldown which causes jitter.



#14 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,403 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 25 July 2013 - 19:27

This.. you are not going to get the same picture quality you are going to get from the Sony 4k tvs.  You will get a tv that is capable of 4k spec but I'd imagine the PQ to be on par with other low end models.

 

When they say the TCL's are really samsungs, they probably mean they use samsung panels. which means they probably use panels in the 4 series category , maybe 5 series for the "good" ones. they still don't have any of the software from the samsungs though(much less the bravia PQ software), arguably that could be a god thing as you don't get the horrible motion flow that makes everything have "water/waves" around it. they stil have horribly noisy darks and terrible contrast though, and probably even worse light bleeding than Samsung. 


You can't display native 24 fps content (i.e. movies) on a 60 Hz display without 3:2 pulldown which causes jitter.

 

ummm. yes you can. a "panel" is NOT 60 hz. the software says its 60, and 60 is the "fastest" it can go. however, they can all operate at a slower REAL 24FPS. which is what most modern TV's do when you watch BluRays.



#15 Rudy

Rudy

    Neowinian Senior

  • 22,404 posts
  • Joined: 30-September 01
  • Location: Ottawa, On

Posted 25 July 2013 - 19:32

4k is only really useful for huge displays 60"+.  Just like 1080p is a bit useless for TVs under 40".  Running 4k resolution on a 27" monitor would ludicrous.  The mouse pointer would be a speck.

I disagree, OSX does a great job with its Retina mode. I love my rMBP and I wish I could have the same thing when I use my desktop