Jump to content



Photo

10 weirdest JFK assassination conspiracy theories

limo driver secret service agent umbrella man freemasons lyndon johnson

  • Please log in to reply
59 replies to this topic

#46 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,171 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 21 December 2013 - 17:12

I don't see any truths here. Only wild claims supported with dubious evidence at best.




#47 arachnoid

arachnoid

    Times a Ticking

  • 3,208 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 11

Posted 21 December 2013 - 17:48

Again "bullets do not emit smoke or gas on entry " what you are trying in an benign and naive way to infer to is to the splatter of material caused by an impact which can just as well be and more likely to be seen on an exit wound.Bullet entry causes suction into the wound,this draws external matter into the wound and if said projectile exits the body,some of this matter and body fluid will exit the wound.

As to the injury to the President I have also seen it mentioned the damage to the skull was at the front of the cranium suggesting a shot from the rear.hence even the evidence of the case you provide is suspect



#48 ted smith

ted smith

    Neowinian

  • 24 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 13

Posted 21 December 2013 - 17:51

The smell of Greer's shot was in the air. According to Gary Mack the wind was blowing back east at 15 mph. That explains the Senators honest account. Not to mention the secret service shooting back. I wonder what agent could have been shooting back in the direction of jfk?

 

Look under 'Beats Fists Against Car'. "The third shot he heard might have been a Secret Service man returning the fire", he said. "The Senator was  three cars behind Jfk's, (the white car) with LBJ. Look above 'Could Smell Gunpowder'; He smelled gunpowder all the way to Parkland Hospital.

 

Senatorseesdrivershootjfk.jpg
altgens_zps96591297.jpg



#49 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 21 December 2013 - 19:36

That's totally false, as all three jfk films produced a clear smoke at the right front of his head, where the driver's bullet entered. Of course a person like myself (telling an obvious truth) will be censored. You are cornered into outright denial of reality. I made the following two gunshot victims into links, which I do not find graphic compared to many death images and other nastiness found around the web.

 

A clear smoke emits at the bullet's entry, one in the front, and the other from the rear. Those are video facts which are totally consistent with all three jfk films. He was shot from front by the driver.

 

 

Bullets do NOT produce smoke! The only smoke is from the exploding charge from the bullet CASING, and that either stays in the gun or is ejected onto the floor.  Bullet's themselves are just a lump of metal,  either solid or hollow, and no NO way to produce smoke at all.

 

You're either lying, or are <redacted so I don't get told off>



#50 Lord Method Man

Lord Method Man

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,656 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 12
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Pro
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 1520

Posted 21 December 2013 - 19:55

We're a tech forum and I'm not happy with some of the graphic imagery being posted here, especially the last one which I have hidden. Guests can also no longer read topics in this forum.

 

Since we're a tech forum, how do you feel about people who apparently create accounts here for no reason other than to copy/paste wackjob conspiracy theories in this thread?



#51 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,171 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 21 December 2013 - 20:02

Bullets don't produce smoke. They do, however, have the potential to create debris clouds.



#52 ted smith

ted smith

    Neowinian

  • 24 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 13

Posted 21 December 2013 - 20:30

Bullets do NOT produce smoke! The only smoke is from the exploding charge from the bullet CASING, and that either stays in the gun or is ejected onto the floor.  Bullet's themselves are just a lump of metal,  either solid or hollow, and no NO way to produce smoke at all.

 

You're either lying, or are <redacted so I don't get told off>

 

Bullets do produce smoke. I posted two victims, not jfk where smoke was present at the entry point. There's a clear smoke present at the front of his head in all three jfk films.



#53 ted smith

ted smith

    Neowinian

  • 24 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 13

Posted 21 December 2013 - 20:33

Since we're a tech forum, how do you feel about people who apparently create accounts here for no reason other than to copy/paste wackjob conspiracy theories in this thread?

 

Since we're on a tech forum, how do you feel about the fact that the driver shot jfk and you can't refute a single piece of evidence I've posted? The only wackjob theory is Oswald shooting jfk in the back of the head when he was clearly shot in the front of the head.



#54 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 21 December 2013 - 20:37

Bullets do produce smoke. I posted two victims, not jfk where smoke was present at the entry point. There's a clear smoke present at the front of his head in all three jfk films.

 

OK genius, explain from where a solid piece of metal produces smoke, and exactly by what mechanism it is able to do so.



#55 ted smith

ted smith

    Neowinian

  • 24 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 13

Posted 21 December 2013 - 21:17

I can't explain why or how it happens, only that it does. Here is four minutes of steel targets producing smoke at point of impact.



#56 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,384 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 21 December 2013 - 21:34

.. That's not smoke produced by the bullets.. No wonder you believe such drivel as you've been posting if you think THAT'S smoke from a bullet..



#57 ted smith

ted smith

    Neowinian

  • 24 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 13

Posted 21 December 2013 - 22:21

JFK was killed by his own administration/government because of his opposition to the Vietnam War. And just a lot of other things. He supposedly said he wanted to dismantle the CIA. The KENNEDYS WERE HATED, BIG TIME.

http://www.globalres...epublic/5346419

LS: What do you see as the prime motive(s) to get Kennedy killed?

MB: To make a long story, which I elaborate in the book, short: JFK had made definitive steps to end the cold war. He had denied the involvement of the army in the Bay of Pigs invasion, which he had inherited from his predecessor, he had solved the missile crisis in Cuba through direct and secret contact with the Soviet-leader Khrushchev, he had ensured a nuclear test-stop with the Soviets, and he had ordered the withdrawal from Vietnam. All this against the will of the military, the CIA, and even against many members of his own administration.

LS: If one looks at the crime from the perspective of “motive, means, opportunity,” which groups are the most likely culprits? Some of the usual suspects may have had a motive, but neither the means nor the opportunity, right?

MB: Yes. This is a crucial point with many JFK theories. A lot of people had motives, be it the hardcore commies in Russia, China, Cuba, be it the Israelis because of JFKs dismissal of nukes in Israel, be it the Federal Reserve because of his idea for a new US dollar backed by silver, the mob because of his dismissal to invade Cuba to get their casinos and brothels back, the racist Southerners because of his engagement for civil rights… but no one of them had the means and opportunity for the murder and above all the means to cover it up over the years.

LS: Which party had the necessary components of “means and opportunity” available?

MB: Only the CIA and the military – and the FBI and the Johnson administration for the cover-up. A moment after the shootings, a policeman ran up to the grassy knoll, his gun pulled out, and stopped a man there, asking for his ID. The man showed a Secret Service card and the cop let him go. Several other men on Dealey Plaza also showed genuine looking Secret Service IDs when asked by cops – but there were no real Secret Service men placed on the knoll and the plaza this day.

These IDs were fakes but the FBI and the Warren Commission didn’t investigate this at all. Only in the 80s it came out who was responsible for the printing of Secret Service IDs and passes at that time: it was the CIAs Technical Division, headed by Sydney Gottlieb of “MK Ultra” fame. This fact alone rules out that the mob or the Russians, Cubans, Chinese or some other autonomous killers did this on their own bill. And even if these groups would have been able to fake genuine looking Secret Service IDs – the fact that this deception was not investigated, immediately brings Hoover’s FBI into a top-position of suspects.

#58 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,171 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 22 December 2013 - 04:17

I can't explain why or how it happens, only that it does. Here is four minutes of steel targets producing smoke at point of impact.

 

That's not smoke. Smoke comes from fire. What you're seeing is the bullet disintegrating as a result of the impact with the steel, and the paint flying off of them.  



#59 Torolol

Torolol

  • 2,827 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 12

Posted 22 December 2013 - 04:38

i also doubt the old established theory that JFK was shot from back by Oswald, at least his head movement doesn't seem that way.



#60 +riahc3

riahc3

    Neowin's most indecisive member

  • 7,642 posts
  • Joined: 09-April 03
  • Location: Spain
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: HTC Desire Z

Posted 22 December 2013 - 04:43

Hello,

It's all my work.

No, it isnt. You are simply searching sites and copying/pasting information. Nothing else.
 

others said it sounded like one. The bleached object he's passing is some kind of handgun. My guess is a 38 revolver

OK so "others" said it sounds like one. Did you hear the shot yourself, meaning you were at the scene?
  

Not spam when the person is actually on topic and just sharing their info. What did your last two posts add to the topic? Nothing but trollish comments honestly. Speak only for yourself. Not everyone is bored of the topic. Very annoying when one person tries to speak for all.

Neowin states this:

Spamming is characterized by the initiation of threads or posts that contribute nothing to a forum, be it off topic or on topic.

To the Neowin forum, it reallly contributes nothing.

 

It's just copy pasta from conspiracy sites. Spam. He's making no attempt to discuss the topic or explain his theories. It's just a wall of reconstituted meat.

Nicely put :)
 
 

That's totally false, as all three jfk films produced a clear smoke at the right front of his head, where the driver's bullet entered. Of course a person like myself (telling an obvious truth) will be censored.

You arent censored becuase you are or are not telling the truth. You are censored because the owner of this site determined that the pictures you are posting are too graphic.

My suggestion is to tone it down because this thread will get closed.

And like many others have said, bullets do not produce smoke. Do you even know what a bullet exactly is? If you think bullets produce smoke and/or do not know what a bullet is, you have no support on any of the theories, which makes the rest of your posts hard to believe.

Take a look at this video. Might make you find out what was actually smoke, isnt:





Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!