Can this man save the world?


Recommended Posts

Joe Williams Sr. believes he has the machine that will help save the world. It will make the sky blue, allow everyone to breathe easier, and, in a time of skyrocketing fuel prices, save us all money.

Yes, it's hard to believe. Williams is a Winnipeg boy who cut his business teeth managing McDonald's and Burger King franchises. Even now, he employs only 15 people in his Toronto and Manitoba offices. He entered this save-the-world field only 11 years ago and has invested just $7.5 million in his product.

But before you sniff skeptically and skip to the next story, read on.

Because if Joe Williams turns out to be right, "I think Bill Gates and our group will be shaking hands," he says. "It's that big."

"It" is his Hydrogen Generating Module, or H2N-Gen for short.

Smaller than a DVD player - small enough to sit comfortably under the hood of any truck or car - it could be big enough to solve the world's greenhouse gas emission problems, at least for the near future. In fact, it could make the Kyoto protocol obsolete. Basically, the H2N-Gen contains a small reservoir of distilled water and other chemicals such as potassium hydroxide. A current is run from the car battery through the liquid. This process of electrolysis creates hydrogen and oxygen gases which are then fed into the engine's intake manifold where they mix with the gasoline vapours.

It's a scientific fact that adding hydrogen to a combustion chamber will cause a cleaner burn. The challenge has always been to find a way to get the hydrogen gas into the combustion chamber in a safe, reliable and cost-effective way.

Williams claims he has achieved this with his H2N-Gen. His product, he said, produces a more complete burn, greatly increasing efficiency and reducing fuel consumption by 10 to 40 per cent - and pollutants by up to 100 per cent.

Most internal combustion engines operate at about 35 per cent efficiency. This means that only 35 per cent of the fuel is fully burned. The rest either turns to carbon corroding the engine or goes out the exhaust pipe as greenhouse gases.

The H2N-Gen increases burn efficiency to at least 97 per cent, Williams said. This saves fuel and greatly reduces emissions.

It also means less engine maintenance and oil changes. The only thing the vehicle owner has to do is refill the unit with distilled water once every 80 hours of engine use.

Tests show the unit itself should lasts for at least 10 years, Williams said.

It can be attached to any kind of internal combustion engine: diesel, gasoline, propane/natural gas.

Also, because the H2N-Gen manufactures only enough hydrogen to feed the engine at a given time, there is no dangerous onboard storage of hydrogen gas and no hydrogen under pressure.

Williams said his product, if it works as well as he claims, will serve as a bridge between the present and the time when the combustion engine is relegated to the scrap heap of history. The preferred interim solution has been gasoline-electric hybrid cars, which remain expensive.

But Williams doesn't want you to take just his word for it.

The H2N-Gen recently went through third-party verification -- known as "proof of concept" - at Wardrop Engineering Inc. of Toronto, specialists in product testing and development. The company built its own prototype according to Williams's design and tested it against Williams's claims. It passed with flying colours.

In fact, Wardrop liked the invention so much the company wants to become an equity partner in Williams's company, Innovative Hydrogen Solutions, said Richard Scheps, Wardrop's product development manager and a co-owner of the engineering firm, which employs 600 people.

"At the time we first saw it, it seemed too good to be true," Scheps said. "But for everything we're seeing it seems really good. It does work. So we're moving into phase two. Refinements and further testing."

He cautions that it's "only a go when everything is finished." But if all goes smoothly, he said, it could be out on the market in six to 12 months.

Further tests are now being performed by the Canadian Environmental Technology Verification (ETV), a non-profit Toronto company licensed by the federal government to verify environmental technology. Williams doesn't have to have ETV approval for his unit. But he said that he is not going to market without it.

"I think it has a high potential to do what they say or think it will," said Adele Buckley, vice-president of technology and research.

"On the basis of what we have seen from other situations, it looks likely, but we will wait until we get the data."

sss

Williams never doubted that his H2N-Gen would work. He said his company has "over 80 million miles of real experience of onroad verification of the machine in all four seasons."

His first target would be heavy vehicle fleets such as public transit buses, trucks and trains because they are the biggest fuel users and their engines are the biggest polluters.

"We're marketing a 20-pound unit for $7,500," Williams predicted. "That's the maximum price that it will be. The average truck out there today will get their money back in eight months at the latest. CN (Canadian National) spends $11 billion a year on fuel and we can save them minimum a guarantee of 10 per cent, $1.1 billion a year."

And that's where things would get financially interesting. In fact, they become financially astronomically interesting. There are, after all, more than one billion combustion engines on earth. Just a fraction of that business would make him a very rich man.

Williams doesn't want to make money just through selling H2N-Gen units. He has his eye on getting a share of the fuel savings.

In other words, he would hope to install the H2N-Gen unit in, say, every Canadian National railway and truck engine for free in return for a percentage of CN's fuel savings.

Furthermore, he would hope to get his hands on carbon credits promised by the Kyoto Protocol. The trade in carbon credits is predicted to be a multi-billion-dollar business as countries attempt to meet their 2012 obligations of cutting greenhouse gases to below 1990 levels. Those who fail to make the cuts will be fined or will have to buy credits from companies that have cut well below the agreed levels.

"Credits are a huge bonus," Williams said. He figures his company could make billions trading them.

sss

Williams's entry into the hydrogen field came 11 years ago when he was running his own management consultant firm in Winnipeg.

"It was a friend introducing me to a friend, saying you got to meet this guy," Williams said.

This guy was an environmentalist and inventor named Gene Stowe, from Tempe, Ariz. Stowe had developed a plastic cylinder that produced hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis on demand only when a fuel engine was running.

Stowe's hydrogen-producing cylinder was "very rudimentary." Among its many problems was a nasty habit of blowing up.

"They had a lot of UFO sightings around the area because whenever his cylinder blew it sent a disc flying 200 to 300 feet into the air," Williams said, chuckling.

Stowe died six months after their meeting. Williams was intrigued enough by that time to try to take the idea to the next level.

Unlike large companies such as Ballard Power Systems of Vancouver, which has spent billions in public and private money trying to develop fuel-saving and emissions-reducing technologies with modest success - including trying to build a low-cost and safe hydrogen-powered electric engine - Williams said that so far he has spent slightly more than $7.5 million. He raised money from a private investment fund in western Canada and from the Wealth Masters International, a private fund in Toronto. No government money has gone into his company.

He's not the only one trying to save the world, and to make a bundle doing it. Other companies have been working on the same theory of hydrogen generation and they are already suing each other over patent infringements.

A Toronto company called Hy-Drive Technologies Ltd., for instance, is suing a Winnipeg competitor called Canadian Hydrogen Energy Corporation over alleged patent infringements and a non-disclosure agreement. Williams is named in the lawsuit since he was a part-owner of CHEC until disagreements led him to leave and form Innovative Hydrogen Solutions.

Hy-Drive last year started marketing a hydrogen generator for trucks. Company president Tom Brown claims to be well ahead of Williams, who he said is little more than a "snake oil salesman."

Williams, for his part, said he has never even met Brown.

It must be noted that when Brown's company hit the Toronto venture exchange last year and began selling its units, it was soon discovered that the product was not reliable. After selling only 55 units at $11,500 a piece, Brown had to take the product off the market. The company's stock is trading at around 78 cents.

Brown said an updated version of his hydrogen generator has rectified reliability problems, but it's not yet on the market. Hy-Drive's unit still weighs about 70 pounds, and at more than 4,000 cubic inches, is much too big to fit into an engine compartment. Truckers have to secure it to the side of their cabs.

But Brown said his company has teamed with Martinrea, a Canadian auto parts manufacturer started three years ago by former executives of the giant Magna Corp., to work on a smaller unit.

Still, it seems that Williams's company is ahead in the game - though, as he notes, the market potential of this technology would be so huge "even 12 competitors could not serve it."

sss

The Gazette drove a 2000 six-cylinder Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with an H2N-Gen prototype from Montreal to Cornwall and back. We set the cruise control at 102 kilometres per hour. The trip computer indicated that on the highway the car averaged about nine litres per 100 kilometres, which is more than 10 per cent below the manufacturer's mileage rating of 10.5. The combined city/highway mileage was slightly more than 11; the car is rated at 12.9.

We also tested the Jeep SUV at one of Ontario's Drive Clean emissions inspection centres. The car's emissions were well below the manufacturer's ratings. For instance, on carbon monoxide, Daimler/Chrysler gives a rating of 5.5 grams per mile for this model of car. The Drive Clean rating for the Jeep was zero.

Ontario's Drive Clean testing has been disparaged by the Automobile Protection Association as inaccurate. So neither of our tests - the mileage and the emissions - can be considered scientific. But anecdotally, the H2N-Gen passed.

What's more, even after the hour-long drive from Montreal, the tailpipe was not hot. In fact, we could wrap our hand around it without getting burned. Williams claims this proves that hot polluting emissions are not coming out of the tailpipe.

Confident that the ETV will approve the H2N-Gen, Wardrop's engineers are designing a streamlined module for the marketplace. "We're working on a prototype that will be one eighth the size (of his present unit) to be used in cars," he said. "That should be ready by next year."

When everything falls in place, he's confident his tiny patented machine will have a huge world-wide impact. Then he'll be well on his way to meeting Bill Gates at the top of the Fortune 500.

If it works.

http://www.canada.com/components/printstor...a6-090911200e96

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5-10 years back, we had the kid who was able to use recycled vegetable oil in his car. Quite the breakthrough. But not much came of it, commercially.

Now, we have this idea. The world thrives on oil, and will continue to thrive on oil until we run out. Things like this won't change that. It will only slow the process down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5-10 years back, we had the kid who was able to use recycled vegetable oil in his car. Quite the breakthrough. But not much came of it, commercially.

Now, we have this idea. The world thrives on oil, and will continue to thrive on oil until we run out. Things like this won't change that. It will only slow the process down.

586548441[/snapback]

true but back then people didnt care about fuel efficiency, now even politicians do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true but back then people didnt care about fuel efficiency, now even politicians do

586548445[/snapback]

Fuel efficiency has been a problem since the 70's. We all are upset about the state of the fuel market now, but if you were to compare gas prices now with those of the late 70's, early 80's (taking inflation into account), then you'd find that they were paying more then than we are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the oil companies are buying technologies like this under wraps, so we have to your use there product, I still dont understand why we have not built a new refinery in the US in 29 years. They are always down for maintenance...Blah, They can take one down for a long time for all I care and make it new. Then do it to the next, then the next, I hope that guy that owns virgin records makes that refinery like he says he wants to do...... ...sorry venting live in San Diego where I dont even want to talk about gas prices, we always get crapped on here for Gas no matter what, always to be 40 cents higher then the national average at all times.... :crazy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he cannot save the world There's the fact that his system still requires gasoline. Automotive companies are working on hydrogen powered cars that do not require gasoline. The holdup is that there are many problems with hydrogen. Namely, it's explosive and is liquid at only extremely low temperatures.

EDIT: There is something called the FuelMeister which turns used cooking oil into bio diesel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of this article is bunk.

For one, in a modern internal combustion engine, the vast majority of fuel in the combustion chamber is burned. If only 35% burned the engine would not even run - it would be far too rich. 35% efficiency refers to the amount of energy extracted from the fuel. It is only 35% because the rest of the energy is wasted as heat from the combustion process or through mechanical friction.

Second, the issue with hydrogen power is not getting hydrogen into cars in a safe manner. We are already able to do that. The issue is the simple act of creating hydrogen in a clean fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seriously c'mon ppl this device turnes the fuel burn efficiency from 37% to 97% that means only 3% waste being thrown in to the air

it means better engine performance and more miles per gallon saving you personally around 40% of your fuel costs and less money on repairs as there is around 40% less carbon build up in your engine i cannot think of anything more important than this device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It an awesome idea and invention. Unfortunately it will not be accepted and utilized as mainstream because OPEC would loose billions as well as all the investors. Anytime there is the potential for a business to loose billions the idea will never be accepted regardless of the benefits. There are alot of ideas and potential for fossil fuels but and entire industry would be affected. The only time these ideas will be implemented is when the primary source is depleted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still dont understand why we have not built a new refinery in the US in 29 years.

Three words, Environmental Protection Agency.

Refineries have been deemed to be far to invasive to the ecosystem therefore they can no longer be built in the U.S. The lobbying power of the environmentalists ensures that no career oriented politicain is going to introduce legislation thati s going to reverse the current set of environmental laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5-10 years back, we had the kid who was able to use recycled vegetable oil in his car. Quite the breakthrough. But not much came of it, commercially.

Now, we have this idea. The world thrives on oil, and will continue to thrive on oil until we run out. Things like this won't change that. It will only slow the process down.

586548441[/snapback]

It is a form of bio-diesel. Most school busses around here use bio-diesel (or a bio-diesel/diesel mix). Once the bio-diesel is processed, however, it does cost more than regular diesel. The key advantage is that it is a clearly burn and relatively odourless (compared to diesel). A lot of fossil fuels are used to make bio-diesel too so it isn't a true solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way noone reads other people's opinions before posting...

I have a feel this is just "too good to be true" as he says himself. The thing magically is small enough to fit a car, and somehow makes all emissions disappear, whilst making the car 60% more efficient.

Right.

Not to mention the whole article is written in "enthusiast who doesn't know a thing", "pop science" style which doesn't give it much credibility.

I personally go with Raskren. Efficiency isn't how much fuel is burnt, it's how much of the fuel's energy you are able to extract and basically put into the road to make your car move forward. I'm also dubious about this magically cool exhaust pipe. There's no way the thing would cool in the 1/2 second it has to get down the pipe. So basically the guy put his hand round the exhaust pipe of a parked jeep :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be nice to see hard data from independent sources including groups specializing in environmental issues and automobile power plants.

Oil barons will never be out of the loop. They will always invest in/buy new technologies so that they can diversify their wealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of this article is bunk.

For one, in a modern internal combustion engine, the vast majority of fuel in the combustion chamber is burned.  If only 35% burned the engine would not even run - it would be far too rich.  35% efficiency refers to the amount of energy extracted from the fuel.  It is only 35% because the rest of the energy is wasted as heat from the combustion process or through mechanical friction.

Second, the issue with hydrogen power is not getting hydrogen into cars in a safe manner.  We are already able to do that.  The issue is the simple act of creating hydrogen in a clean fashion.

586548678[/snapback]

That is what i thought as well. Unless he means they could get 97% of engery into engine. ( Which i think is virtually impossible )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he cannot save the world  There's the fact that his system still requires gasoline.  Automotive companies are working on hydrogen powered cars that do not require gasoline.  The holdup is that there are many problems with hydrogen.  Namely, it's explosive and is liquid at only extremely low temperatures.

EDIT:  There is something called the FuelMeister which turns used cooking oil into bio diesel.

586548666[/snapback]

yes it still requires gasoline but this modification makes more efficient use of the gasoline, giving the consumer more miles to the gallon, driving down gas consumption and costs.

Im not sure how accurate the article is...but it says that this modification will also make emissions cleaner. *shrugs*

Three words, Environmental Protection Agency.

Refineries have been deemed to be far to invasive to the ecosystem therefore they can no longer be built in the U.S.  The lobbying power of the environmentalists ensures that no career oriented politicain is going to introduce legislation thati s going to reverse the current set of environmental laws.

586548713[/snapback]

Exactly. The EPA is a plague to the United States in terms of technological advancement. Too many friggin regulations...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5-10 years back, we had the kid who was able to use recycled vegetable oil in his car. Quite the breakthrough. But not much came of it, commercially.

Now, we have this idea. The world thrives on oil, and will continue to thrive on oil until we run out. Things like this won't change that. It will only slow the process down.

586548441[/snapback]

That fuel is called Bio Diesel. It's taking off worldwide... ;) just look at the official site and see what fuel stations actually offer it in the U.S. alone. It's big in Europe.

http://www.biodiesel.org/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.