Why $5 Gas Is Good for America

[rbet]

Why $5 Gas Is Good for America

At the climax of his book Twilight in the Desert, Houston investment banker and energy guru Matthew Simmons describes a visit to the world's most powerful oil company, Saudi Aramco, in Dhahran. Simmons listens in horror as a senior manager reveals the kingdom's darkest secret. The old ways no longer suffice. To keep their aging wells productive, the Saudis now rely upon one information age prop after another: advanced analysis of rock cores, 3-D seismic imagery, software for diagnosing underground oil flows - all integrated using something called fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic? The Aramco man tries to explain the science of complex systems and partial information, but Simmons hears only tidings of a bleak future. Obviously, the end of energy as we know it is nigh.

Well, blow us down - algorithms in the oil patch! What next? Hydrogen-spewing superbugs? In a word, yes. And that's just the beginning.

Simmons' techno-cluelessness would be funny - calling Jed Clampett with his 12-gauge! - if he weren't the spearhead of a whole hand-wringing school of petro-pessimism. The oil fields are running dry, the gas gauge is on empty, the American way of life is doomed - these ideas bob like plastic shark fins on the storm surge of current oil prices. But the history of energy innovation suggests something very different - and a lot less dire.

Yes, a few billion newly motorized citizens of BRIC - that's economist-speak for Brazil, Russia, India, and China - have turned up unexpectedly at the filling station, pushing prices sharply north. And yes, the oil world has lately endured more than its usual share of ugly headlines: insurgency in Iraq, unrest in Venezuela, mayhem in the Gulf of Mexico. And, OK, all those air-conditioned Cadillac Escalades are thirsty beasts. A million extra barrels a day burned here, a million fewer pumped there, a little geopolitical instability, and suddenly the price of the stuff that makes the wheels go around is flirting with historic peaks.

All of which would be seriously alarming but for one happy fact: We've never had more options for keeping those wheels turning. Aramco's fuzzy logic is just one of a multitude of new tools and fuels - some proven, some in the works, and some wildly speculative. The main thing standing between those possibilities and your gas tank is cheap crude oil that costs Aramco barely $3 a barrel to bring to the surface.

So rising oil prices are more than just an irritant or even an ominous nick out of the GDP. They're an invitation to corn and coal and hydrogen. For anyone with a fresh idea, expensive oil is as good as a subsidy - with no political strings attached. Indeed, every extra penny you pay at the pump is an incentive for some aspiring energy mogul to find another fuel.

For the better part of a century, cheap oil has fatally undercut all comers, not to mention smothered high-minded campaigns for conservation, increased efficiency, and energy independence. But growing demand is outrunning the oil industry's carefully computed supply curves, bidding up long-term expectations for the price of energy. The long term may not mean a lot when you're standing at the pump, but the oil industry lives in a world where big projects take a decade to build and the checks that pay for them have eight or nine zeroes. Crude hit $70 a barrel last August, but oil companies have learned the hard way how quickly prices can crash. They adjust their expectations accordingly - downward.

For years, the industry's long-term benchmark was $20 a barrel in today's dollars; to get a green light, new investments needed to be profitable at that level. Now the industry is counting on prices to settle near $30. Some aggressive CEOs believe they'll stay as high as $40.

The changing outlook opens horizons - for conventional drilling, sure, but also for alternatives. Some new technologies merely produce more crude. But others tap energy supplies that have nothing to do with black pools under the Middle East.

Big Oil is already reaping the benefits of innovations developed in the 1990s, when long-term forecasts still pegged oil at $20 a barrel. Take digital oil fields - sensor-laden pumping operations under remote control - and ultradeep offshore platforms that drill beneath miles of water and rock to get at previously inaccessible deposits. But with the high end of long-term expectations hitting $40, novel energy sources are becoming attractive. Natural gas that used to be burned as an unwanted oil-field byproduct is being compressed into liquid fuel, and gooey tar sands are being shoveled out of the Canadian countryside to extract the embedded petroleum.

Push the long-term price forecast above $40, and more exotic possibilities come into play. Remember Jimmy Carter's synfuel program, which aimed to turn huge US coal reserves into gasoline? Three billion dollars in federal research money is now committed to making it happen. Corn, sugar, and soybean farmers hope rising prices can do what billions in subsidies and tax-funded research couldn't: make ethanol and biodiesel cost-effective. Smarter money is betting that using plant waste will prove more economical. These technologies join compressed natural gas, already widely used where it's worth spending extra money for cleaner exhaust.

Sustained crude prices above $60 would make feasible technologies that today seem too expensive or entirely speculative. It's hard to see demand for oil surviving long at such a cost. But given a push now, some nascent technologies - hydrogen, most obviously, but also hydrocarbons locked away in methane hydrates - could become viable at the end of a long road. Technology breakthroughs are the key here: For instance, Shell has found a better way to extract oil from shale, reviving a long-abandoned resource. And some seemingly distant options are right under our noses; consider the plug-in version of the hybrid car.

The cost of developing entirely new energy supplies is daunting, but the money is available - and we're not talking about the $14.5 billion porkfest served up by Washington's recent energy bill. The global oil industry will rake in three quarters of a trillion dollars this year. And when that kind of money is up for grabs, investors are never far away.

But it's not just energy producers and their shareholders who should be smiling about today's high prices. Conservation your thing? Savor the long faces worn these days by Hummer salespeople. Eager for energy independence? There won't be any wars for oil in Colorado shale country. Praying for reductions in atmospheric carbon? Synthetic diesel made from natural gas would be a step in the right direction.

True, fuzzy logic can't refill spent oil wells. But neither are digital oil fields and coal-to-liquid processing some last, forlorn rest stop on the highway back to the Stone Age. It was James Watt's steam engine that chained sailing ships to their berths - not lack of wind. Petroleum sent coal and horse power packing, even though mountains of coal waited to be mined and plenty of stallions remained in the barn. The oil shocks of the '70s gave a boost to funny little cars from Japan, and mid-20th-century American industrialism never recovered.

Could a similar fate await Aramco's finest? It's not written in stone that humanity has to propel itself with petroleum alone. Happy as the oil kings may be to sell today's $60 barrels, they're playing with fire. Simmons himself inadvertently makes that point when he frets that Aramco depends on technologies "unheard of a decade ago." That's the whole point of innovation: There's no telling where the next game-changing energy resource will come from. But motivating tens of thousands of scientists and engineers to look for it increases the odds of finding the path to a happier, maybe even cleaner, planet.

So what's a price-shocked, carbon-afflicted highway jockey to do? Keep driving. In fact, drive more. The longer gas stays expensive, the higher the chance we'll see alternatives. Put that pedal to the metal. And smile when you see a big black $3 or $4 out in front at the gas pump. Those innovators need all the encouragement they can get. Shale oil, uranium, sunlight - there's enough energy out there for a dozen planets. Where we'll all park is another matter.

Source: Wired

[mAcOdIn Veteran]

5 dollar gas is good for America in the same manner that getting hit by a meteor or plague would be good for America. In the present it would be chaos and the economy and everyone would suffer and in the future we would reap the benefits of rebuilding and starting anew.

Hardly something one should hope for but not the end of civilization either.

[rbet]

5 dollar gas is good for America in the same manner that getting hit by a meteor or plague would be good for America.  In the present it would be chaos and the economy and everyone would suffer and in the future we would reap the benefits of rebuilding and starting anew.

Hardly something one should hope for but not the end of civilization either.

586842529[/snapback]

Very well put. :yes:

[kennyout]

5 dollar gas is good for America in the same manner that getting hit by a meteor or plague would be good for America.  In the present it would be chaos and the economy and everyone would suffer and in the future we would reap the benefits of rebuilding and starting anew.

Hardly something one should hope for but not the end of civilization either.

586842529[/snapback]

yeah just look at Katrinia and Rita building....its real profitable/building to the citizens....(refering to the sudden influx of New Orleans illegals) :whistle:

but seriouslly, a major disaster for us is basically already here, we have these factors:

the War on Terror

the current geological climate

floods, hurricanes, sudden NOV tornados(which seems to be happening more every year)

Delphi corp Bankrupcy

GM possible closings/ect

Airline Industry(American owned)

Oil Industry damages

Political hayday/possible civil war brewing...

[Beastage]

There is a sudden appearence in the market of highly efficient and economical petrol engines and add to them a whole new improved diesel engines that save petrol/diesel and produce as much power.

Where all this new engines coming from? they come from motor companies who had the ability to do so but had no real reason, now they have a very good reason and that means less pollution to everyone on this freaking planet.

[Sandor]

There is a sudden appearence in the market of highly efficient and economical petrol engines and add to them a whole new improved diesel engines that save petrol/diesel and produce as much power.

Where all this new engines coming from? they come from motor companies who had the ability to do so but had no real reason, now they have a very good reason and that means less pollution to everyone on this freaking planet.

586854773[/snapback]

its like this in the UK..."gas" or petrol as we (properly) call it works out about $5.70 for 1 of your fine american gallons.

average car owned by most of the populous would be between 1 and 2 litre engine size and usually around or under 100HP.

its simply idiotic to go out and get guzzler that does 10 miles to the gallon because it ends up costing you bucket loads. remember a gallon in the UK is about 4.5litres...

the culture is different too. we pay per litre at the petrol station and the price is displayed as such...rather than buying per gallon as it seems to be in north america

[Matt]

its like this in the UK..."gas" or petrol as we (properly) call it works out about $5.70 for 1 of your fine american gallons.

average car owned by most of the populous would be between 1 and 2 litre engine size and usually around or under 100HP.

its simply idiotic to go out and get guzzler that does 10 miles to the gallon because it ends up costing you bucket loads. remember a gallon in the UK is about 4.5litres...

the culture is different too. we pay per litre at the petrol station and the price is displayed as such...rather than buying per gallon as it seems to be in north america

586860738[/snapback]

id say the avg mpg would be 15-19 in the US. as far as the article, i find it hard to make a post without sounding redundant (damn you macodin :p ).