Recommended Posts

Warp isn't different, its just stylised differently to set the old and new movies apart.

In Admiral Marcus office you could see models of the ships and the NX-01 was there so its still Zephram Cochranes warp drive.

The NX Class still pre-dates Nero's incursion.

I didn't get the bit where they were surprised to be overtaken at warp speed. They said that it wasn't possible and then Marcus's daughter said that the Vengeance included advanced warp capabilities or something. It gave the impression that warp speed is considered a constant in the new ST (i.e. no warp factors). The only other explanation is that they thought that the Enterprise was the fastest ship in Starfleet but it certainly wasn't clear.

I didn't get the bit where they were surprised to be overtaken at warp speed. They said that it wasn't possible and then Marcus's daughter said that the Vengeance included advanced warp capabilities or something. It gave the impression that warp speed is considered a constant in the new ST (i.e. no warp factors). The only other explanation is that they thought that the Enterprise was the fastest ship in Starfleet but it certainly wasn't clear.

I interpreted that to mean that the Enterprise was the fastest known ship in the fleet but the Vengeance was even more advanced, which I think is the most logical assumption. The alternate timeline is still canonical, so warp speeds wouldn't simply have become a constant.

  • Like 2

I'm still under the impression that the new warp drives utilize some sort of transwarp technology built by data taken of Nero's ship (Which was augmented with Borg technology) and reverse engineered.

It seems that Enterprise is able to traverse vast distances in shorter amounts of time compared to the previous timeline.

Enterprise was built before Scotty was given the transwarp formula by Spock Prime in the first film so it doesn't have it - yet.

Khan was awakened to make new combat dreadnoughts for Section 31, and likely incorporated an improved version of transwarp into USS Vengeance during its construction at Jupiter Station.

Was the Vengeance more advanced, or just a purely combat focused ship? My impression was the latter.

Both. It had more advanced technology (better shields, weapons, faster warp drive, and better transporter capability) and it was designed to be a warship. That's why it had more automated systems so the ship could be operated by a smaller crew.

I'm still under the impression that the new warp drives utilize some sort of transwarp technology built by data taken of Nero's ship (Which was augmented with Borg technology) and reverse engineered.

It seems that Enterprise is able to traverse vast distances in shorter amounts of time compared to the previous timeline.

I doubt it because the Narada used borg nanoprobes to achieve transwarp speeds. I think it has more to do with the pacing of the movie.

It seemed like the Enterprise went from Kronos to Earth in a short amount of time. I'm guessing J.J. Abrams decided to speed that part up for the sake of the action.

Aside from future Scotty's transwarp beaming formula, the Abrams' Star Trek reality seems to be technologically inferior to the main universe. I mentioned this in an earlier post but I'm guessing the destruction of Vulcan as well as the USS Kelvin contributed to the technological inferiority. In the first movie, the Enterprise had many warp reactors that made up the warp core. In Star Trek Into Darkness,

the Enterprise has one single warp core that has to be shielded to prevent radiation leakage. The only thing more advanced than TOS ships in the main universe is the USS Vengeance. Whether or not it's faster than say the Enterprise-E (Sovereign class) remains to be seen. Also, Khan mentioned something about radiation or magnetic interference in the USS Vengeance's warp core so the technology is still quite similar. Transwarp is so advanced that only the Borg and one or two other delta quadrant races used it.

I guess I'm saying the Vengeance was more evolutionary than revolutionary per the other poster's point. I agree with your prior post.

I really don't like the idea of transwarp, especially in this timeline, regardless of whatever future tech could have been gleaned from the scans of the Narada and opened up new areas of question (Terminator2)...I agree with Anaron that it doesn't seem to offset the technological loss of Vulcan and the alternate timeline seems too primitive to have such tech, let alone have the materials and production ability to use it.

I'm more of the theory that JJ really doesn't get the difference between hyperspace and warp factors, which means the Vengeance was only 'slightly' faster than the Enterprise if it took the entire trip to Earth to catch them.

Remember this has alt-timeline elements from 2 previous films; Wrath of Khan and Search for Spock. I took USS Vengeance to be this timelines version of USS Excelsior (a transwarp ship) from Search for Spock, but this time Scotty didn't sabotage the transwarp - he hitchhiked and sabotaged the hatch so Kirk and Khan could board her.

Also, in the real world warp theory has develpped since the 1980's.

To do warp drive you create a spacetime bubble around your ship and do not move within that bubble, therefore you are not going faster than light within your local spacetime. This does not, however, prevent that spacete bubble from moving at superluminal speeds within another larger spacetime bubble (the universe). It is not matter with mass & inertia and therefore speed constraints, but a massless (in this universe) quantum fluctuation that can "tunnel" through space.

In the Trek universe transwarp ships can apparently penetrate that warp bubble.

Remember this has alt-timeline elements from 2 previous films; Wrath of Khan and Search for Spock I took USS Vengeance to be this timelines version of USS Excelsior from Search for Spock, but this time Scotty didn't sabotage the transwarp - he hitchhiked and sabotaged the hatch so Kirk and Khan cojld board her.

Thats a good point, except I still don't like comparing it with that timeline (as some reviewers have done due to some synchronistic elements).

Thats a good point, except I still don't like comparing it with that timeline (as some reviewers have done due to some synchronistic elements).

1) doesn't matter what they say, it is what it is. The parallels are too clear.

2) movie reviewers are almost universally twits, incapable of getting alt-timeline stories. At all. The same ones will bust a hernia over Days of Future Past. Ignore them.

I think you are all reading too much into the warp thing, they have shortened the time it takes to get anywhere purely for storytelling circumstances, I don't think people at the cinema want to see them all sat in chairs for days while the ship makes its way to Qu'onos.

I never followed Star Trek, but just watch the movies for entertainment. I just had a few questions from the movie.

1. Khan, why was he so evil?

2. Why did Khan and his crew go to sleep?

3. How did the Admiral find him and his crew and why did he just wake up Khan?

1. They were all genetically engineered people that fought in the Eugenics Wars, they were engineered to be aggressive and lack compassion like a perfect soldier.

2. Khan ruled a lot of continents during the Eugenic Wars, after the war all the genetically engineered people were sentenced to death, Khan escaped on an old sleeper ship with some of his followers and they put themselves into cryogenic sleep and the ship drifted for centuries.

3. Admiral Marcus was probably looking for them and its unclear how he found them, he woke up Khan to make him design a warship to help in the inevitable war with the Klingons

1. They were all genetically engineered people that fought in the Eugenics Wars, they were engineered to be aggressive and lack compassion like a perfect soldier.

2. Khan ruled a lot of continents during the Eugenic Wars, after the war all the genetically engineered people were sentenced to death, Khan escaped on an old sleeper ship with some of his followers and they put themselves into cryogenic sleep and the ship drifted for centuries.

3. Admiral Marcus was probably looking for them and its unclear how he found them, he woke up Khan to make him design a warship to help in the inevitable war with the Klingons

Thank you for answering that. Did the movie explain that? I just remember them explaining that

Khan and his crew were exiled and they put themselves to sleep, then the Admiral found them and woke Khan up to build weapons for the war, which seemed like the Admiral was wanting, not that it was inevitable.

Thank you for answering that. Did the movie explain that? I just remember them explaining that

Khan and his crew were exiled and they put themselves to sleep, then the Admiral found them and woke Khan up to build weapons for the war, which seemed like the Admiral was wanting, not that it was inevitable.

It did explain that Khan was genetically engineered but said nothing about the eugenics wars.

The Admiral did want weapons but when he was explaining his actions to Kirk near the end he said war with the Klingons was inevitable, he wanted a warship and Kirk to provoke the Klingons into war on his own terms rather than theirs.

As a die hard trek fan who has seen every movie and every single episode and collected all the fact files when I was a kid... I thought the movie was pretty good.

I was a bit shocked when I saw Harrison was Khan but not disappointed as I would have been if I learnt before hand. Also, the role reversal regarding kirk/spock was sort of cheesy but a good homage and I think it was handled OK. This didn't feel like a remake of the Wrath of Khan, it felt like an entirely new story but with a familiar character. The one thing that gets me about the new franchise is how advanced all the tech is. I assumed the duration of time Nero's ship spent back in that time frame really altered the quadrant. Also. Why the hell did the Klingons have piercings in their ridges???

I need to know these things!!!

With JJ Abrams moving on to Star Wars and

the Enterprise crew starting their 5-year mission

, I could see this Star Trek movie being the last one for quite a while. Thoughts everyone on a sequel to Into Darkness?

It may be awhile and I'd rather wait longer if J.J. Abrams directs it. He's going to direct the next Star Wars movie so I wouldn't expect another Star Trek movie, directed by him, for at least another 6 years. It took 4 years for the sequel to be released but who knows, we might get another one in less than 4 years.

As for what the sequel will be about, it could be something totally new or it could be something we've already seen in the main TOS universe (e.g. V'Ger, Sybok, General Chang).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!