Recommended Posts

As for what the sequel will be about, it could be something totally new or it could be something we've already seen in the main TOS universe (e.g. V'Ger, Sybok, General Chang).

No, no, and no! V'Ger story, was "eh" at best, I REFUSE to believe Sybok even exists, and General Chang was a great story line (Then again so was ST: TWoK, but Abrams ****ed with it anyway).

No, no, and no! V'Ger story, was "eh" at best, I REFUSE to believe Sybok even exists, and General Chang was a great story line (Then again so was

ST: TWoK

but Abrams ****ed with it anyway).

Actually i reckon exploring v'gers possible links with the borg could be pretty awesome.

Also put a spoiler tag on the

ST: TWoK

just incase someone hasn't seen the new movie.

Actually i reckon exploring v'gers possible links with the borg could be pretty awesome.

Also put a spoiler tag on the

ST: TWoK

just incase someone hasn't seen the new movie.

The only thing is, the Borg have existed far longer than our space program did. They were known to have assimilated a handful of planets far back as the Renaissance Period. If Abrams were to do a Borg story, **** would hit the fan fast, as I think he has the power to make the Borg "cool" again, and to give them the power that Voyager took away from them.

The only thing is, the Borg have existed far longer than our space program did. They were known to have assimilated a handful of planets far back as the Renaissance Period. If Abrams were to do a Borg story, **** would hit the fan fast, as I think he has the power to make the Borg "cool" again, and to give them the power that Voyager took away from them.

Absolutely. That's why exploring the borg in tandem with the v'ger probe would be pretty epic. Appease the fans with comic based backstory and show the good bits in the movie.

It may be awhile and I'd rather wait longer if J.J. Abrams directs it. He's going to direct the next Star Wars movie so I wouldn't expect another Star Trek movie, directed by him, for at least another 6 years.

From what I understand they're going to go ahead without him for the next film but have him as an executive producer, as 2016 will be the 50th anniverary. There's an IMDB page that seems to support this and this page supports that as well.

Absolutely. That's why exploring the borg in tandem with the v'ger probe would be pretty epic. Appease the fans with comic based backstory and show the good bits in the movie.

I wish they could fit the Borg into the Abrams universe but I don't think it would work. The Borg isn't a part of the TOS universe. Unless there's remnants of Borg technology from 2153 (Regeneration), I don't see how they can be a threat. It's an alternate reality so they don't have to play by the same rules.

From what I understand they're going to go ahead without him for the next film but have him as an executive producer, as 2016 will be the 50th anniverary. There's an IMDB page that seems to support this and this page supports that as well.

I see. I'd prefer it if Abrams directed it because I like his directing style, minus the lens flares. But of course, I'd be happy with anything Star Trek.

The only thing is, the Borg have existed far longer than our space program did. They were known to have assimilated a handful of planets far back as the Renaissance Period. If Abrams were to do a Borg story, **** would hit the fan fast, as I think he has the power to make the Borg "cool" again, and to give them the power that Voyager took away from them.

I was waiting for B Braga to somehow give Archer's Enterprise a transphasic torpedo or two so he could blow up a cube in one shot.

I have to say I was really impressed with the movie - I was disappointed that after only one week Carmike whom I normally go to put the sucker in one of their smaller theaters to make way for Epic...but over all a great movie.

I enjoyed the movie, and as a big Star Trek fan I loved the references to other movies. I wonder if anyone picked up on the ST6 homage or if it was lost in all the other ones?

Also if the next movie is 3 years, 2016, that'd be great. The fact they also just started their mission means that the next movie could have us go back a bit to the roots and have the crew run into something totally new out there. Or we could just have run-ins with Klingons and more fights. A mix of both sounds even better though.

Thank you for answering that. Did the movie explain that? I just remember them explaining that

Khan and his crew were exiled and they put themselves to sleep, then the Admiral found them and woke Khan up to build weapons for the war, which seemed like the Admiral was wanting, not that it was inevitable.

Khan also despises people that he feels are of a lesser status in intellectual capability and was one of the reasons he enjoyed the cat and mouse game with Kirk (besides his wife).

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451613490

New theory: John Harrison isn't Khan, but Joaquin (or another augment) using his name to protect him.

That's an interesting theory but given the events in Star Trek Into Darkness, it would seem like a huge waste. It would only make sense if the real Khan is awoken but who would do that? Admiral Marcus was a part of Section 31 and he did it out of desperation. I can see it happening if war breaks out between the Federation and Klingons but I feel like we'll see a near-miss, just like the main universe movies (e.g. No Country for Old Men).

Vengeance = Reliant + Excelsior.

Remember, you're in a new timeline.

never found out if the vengeance blew up or not, we saw some bits exploding and that was it. vengeance looked a bit like something from enterprise but from the future.

I still think the enterprise interior is pretty crap looking like in engineering.....looks like a factory. even enterprise managed to have a star trek engineering with warp core, consoles etc. and that was set before kirk. corridors and bridge look alright, but still too many lens flares. I keep wondering if JJ has actually watched any "proper" trek. I know it's a re-imaging, but come on, some things needed to be done better.

While all the tubes are plausible, I prefer the more control center feel or even the ENT approach too. Its a stylistic choice, but no other show/movie had ever made me think 'they must have a ton of space plumbers'. They aren't cooling a nuclear reactor in there.

  • Like 1

While all the tubes are plausible, I prefer the more control center feel or even the ENT approach too. Its a stylistic choice, but no other show/movie had ever made me think 'they must have a ton of space plumbers'. They aren't cooling a nuclear reactor in there.

That reminded me about how a coolant leak brought down the Enterprise D. XD . Maybe they should hire more "plumbers".

Ever been to the engine room on a real ship?

yes, on old boats that are museums...

star trek is set in the future, or have you forgotten that? none of the other movies or series had engine rooms that looked like a giant warehouse/factory with girders and tanks everywhere and massive pipes. even the tos engineering looks better imo and that's really basic & dated.

Ever been to the engine room on a real ship?

yes, on old boats that are museums...

star trek is set in the future, or have you forgotten that? none of the other movies or series had engine rooms that looked like a giant warehouse/factory with girders and tanks everywhere and massive pipes. even the tos engineering looks better imo and that's really basic & dated.

That reminded me about how a coolant leak brought down the Enterprise D. XD . Maybe they should hire more "plumbers".

Hehe, quite true, but I think the difference remains that 'plasma coolant' is quite a different animal than water systems used in 'old boats'. ;)

Re: the water plant -

Water is a good coolant, can be catalyzed into O2 and H2 for breathing and for making methane (a fuel, chemical precursor, and also an easy way to "store" hydrogen - a testy thing to store otherwise) using the Sabatier process, sewage, drinking, bathing etc. etc. It's uses are endless, and superheated steam is a great propellant (ex: nuclear thermal rocket.)

You have thousands of people on a ship the size of a small city, trillions of miles in space with all those potential uses and you don't think they'd need a large closed-cycle water treatment plant on board?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!