Recommended Posts

:/

Rough approximation of my face as Abrams tries to suggest anyone can enter a warp core and survive more than a millisecond as even slightly legitimate in any Star Trek related show/movie.

Depends on the type of radiation. Some kill slower than others, plus many (photonic) would have a high directionality in roughly in parallel with the alignment gap.

There were a couple of reasons I liked the radiation scene. One, it showed that even though there's an

obvious timeline difference, some things were simply meant to be. Which brings me to number 2: Old Spock tells

new Spock the story (we know this when he starts with the "At great cost" line), and when Scotty calls Spock to

Engineering, Spock tears ass down there because he knows what that cost is. I thought it was awesome.

Perhaps an original story ....

That's where I'm confused. A local reviewer threw it under the bus for the same complaint, that somehow its just a rehash/remake of a prior film, which is simply not true. How can you dismiss the entire film (and overlook other more relevant criticisms) over a 10 minute bit of synchronicity? At worst, there are some mirror sections, but that is well established already when dealing with alternate timelines.

  • Like 3

^ I don't dismiss the entire movie -- it is entertaining.

It has lots of razzle-dazzle.

Acting was good.

But I doubt I would have watched, knowing it was a reboot of

The Wrath of Kahn.

It also has the same story hole -- 200 years from now, they are too dumb to have some sort of protective suits in dealing with radiation ... ?

In the same movie, they survive flying thru Space, in astronaut suits !

I would also expect that they would have 23rd century robots, androids that could have gone in, and do what Kirk did.

:/

Rough approximation of my face as Abrams tries to suggest anyone can enter a warp core and survive more than a millisecond as even slightly legitimate in any Star Trek related show/movie.

Its not worse than the idea that black holes create a portal that sends you back in the past :) (Sometimes, other times they apparently crush you and suck you in. I guess this is random and dependent on the needs of the story at the time).

^ I don't dismiss the entire movie -- it is entertaining.

It has lots of razzle-dazzle.

Acting was good.

But I doubt I would have watched, knowing it was a reboot of

The Wrath of Kahn.

It also has the same story hole -- 200 years from now, they are too dumb to have some sort of protective suits in dealing with radiation ... ?

In the same movie, they survive flying thru Space, in astronaut suits !

I would also expect that they would have 23rd century robots, androids that could have gone in, and do what Kirk did.

Actually there's a continuity error there too.

one of the new bridge officers is an android... afaik Commander Data was the only known android to be in Starfleet...

Actually there's a continuity error there too.

one of the new bridge officers is an android... afaik Commander Data was the only known android to be in Starfleet...

Hmm .. I haven't read that anywhere.. I guess I'll find out when I see the movie.

I find this whole area of Star Trek lore a bit problematic though. After all, by the 24th century they can create countless holograms that act perfectly intelligent, have complex personalities, and even display emotion, but its such a big deal for them to embed the same exact program in a walking robot?

>

I find this whole area of Star Trek lore a bit problematic though. After all, by the 24th century they can create countless holograms that act perfectly intelligent, have complex personalities, and even display emotion, but its such a big deal for them to embed the same exact program in a walking robot?

Holodecks have the whole ships computer and information logs available to do that mind simulation. It's orders of magnitude harder to make that portable, even for todays limited neural net simulations.

Holodecks have the whole ships computer and information logs available to do that mind simulation. It's orders of magnitude harder to make that portable, even for todays limited neural net simulations.

And yet they were able to put a simulation of the entire known galaxy for Moriarty and his wife in a tabletop device.

Just saw it in IMAX 3D, and I've got to say I was pleasantly surprised :D The tie-ins to other movies (while they did make it a bit predictable closer to the end) I enjoyed, and even the group of people I went with (most of whom had never seen a Trek show/movie in their life) liked it a lot.

Am I correct in thinking that the half-destroyed moon hovering over Qo'noS/Kronos was Praxis, tying it in to The Undiscovered Country? And the whole "tribble comes back to life" scene was completely predictable, even if you hadn't seen The Search for Spock.

Also I agree with the person up there who said the ending was possibly leading it into a new series, I would love to see a new Trek series. The only thing about the whole "building into a series" ending I didn't like was that it's probably going to be an rebootverse version of TOS, which could honestly get old fast.

overall a great movie, I would recommend it to just about everyone :p

He looks the part but he didn't win me over with his interpretation of Spock. Too much emotion.

Agreed, I don't know why he just didn't play himself, any interview ive seen with him, he seems to have a personality of a brick.

Ive been to see it twice so far, its a good film and its got some nice tie ins, but too much story taken from a previous movie, once you realise who the baddie is, you can more or less work out the remaining screentime.

Also the "baddie" whilst very good, looks nothing like or even from the same gene pool as the TOS version. That kind of wound me up :)

Its not worse than the idea that black holes create a portal that sends you back in the past :) (Sometimes, other times they apparently crush you and suck you in. I guess this is random and dependent on the needs of the story at the time).

And don't forget that when two stars collapse in alternate universes you can get sucked into a mirror universe at warp 36.

For the love of everything that is Trekkie....stop trying to pull apart this lovable movie and just enjoy it. I saw it today and it outstanding.

I agree. I saw it last night on IMAX 3D and I was very pleased with it. The only thing that bothered me was that the Enterprise didn't shoot a single phaser!!!!!....LOL...LOL....No actual battle there, and Abrahams didn't really show the Enterprise from the outside much, other than that the movie was well made. Without directly giving away anything, I will say that there was a "cameo" there by someone we are all familiar with and the movie has the "K" letter written all over the place.

I really wanted to see a serious phaser battle between the Enterprise and the other ship :(

I agree. I saw it last night on IMAX 3D and I was very pleased with it. The only thing that bothered me was that the Enterprise didn't shoot a single phaser!!!!!....LOL...LOL....No actual battle there, and Abrahams didn't really show the Enterprise from the outside much, other than that the movie was well made. Without directly giving away anything, I will say that there was a "cameo" there by someone we are all familiar with and the movie has the "K" letter written all over the place.

I really wanted to see a serious phaser battle between the Enterprise and the other ship :(

Yeah that was one thing about the movie. They didn't really show the firepower of the Enterprise. Oh wait, they stated that in the movie it's not supposed to be a 'fighter class'. lol. Also, Alice Eve was pretty nice on the eyes. Too bad her character didn't play a large role in the movie.

Yeah that was one thing about the movie. They didn't really show the firepower of the Enterprise. Oh wait, they stated that in the movie it's not supposed to be a 'fighter class'. lol. Also, Alice Eve was pretty nice on the eyes. Too bad her character didn't play a large role in the movie.

Funny because on the first movie, the Enterprise really kicked ass with those phasers!!!!....LOL...She is well equipped to fight and kick ass and its true fighting capabilities should have been shown on this movie. I think fans expected it.

Funny because on the first movie, the Enterprise really kicked ass with those phasers!!!!....LOL...She is well equipped to fight and kick ass and its true fighting capabilities should have been shown on this movie. I think fans expected it.

Well I guess if you do a Vengance vs Enterprise weaponry.. I think the Vengance has more. LOL. Afterall, it's the flagship battleship.

Well I guess if you do a Vengance vs Enterprise weaponry.. I think the Vengance has more. LOL. Afterall, it's the flagship battleship.

Maybe we'll see a bit more on the next film. The film leaves you with the possibility of "Revenge" in mind. I don't think we have seen the last of "John Harrison".

Nope. This is after the timeline split so anything goes.

Not really. It's not realistic to have major advancements being made a century before their appearance in the prime timeline, especially given that the destruction of Vulcan would have significantly impeded the development of technology by the Federation. However, in respect to this particular case his character was an "augmented human" and not an android.

Felt the ending was rushed. Cumberbach was a badass baddie,

but did not get to see enough of the "bad" Khan. Felt that after Spock's double crossing, he would go ballistic and destroy half the Earth. But instead all we got was a fistfight and it ended. Would have liked it better if the film ended with Kirk dying and Vengeance crashing into the sea and Khan escaping, with a more epic battle (of wits and firepower, not hand to hand combat) in the sequel.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Installed here without issue. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search by Paul Hill Microsoft has released Visual Studio Code 1.125, its latest weekly release. This week, the company has focused on discovering and installing extra language models via the Marketplace; searching the web and securely browsing over remote connections without leaving VS Code; choosing how long VS Code waits before installing extension updates; and delivering managed Copilot settings through existing device management tooling. In older versions of VS Code, extensions could contribute their own model providers, but to find these extensions, you needed the right tags to search for in the Extension view. Now, the Language Models editor gives you an Install Model Providers button that opens the Extensions view, which is filtered to extensions that contribute model providers, making it easier to find and install them. Once you install a provider, its model will appear in the model picker. If you use the integrated browser much, you can now look up information without leaving VS Code by typing a query into the integrated browser’s address bar. It will use your configured search engine, the same way a standalone browser does. You can use workbench.browser.searchEngine to pick a search engine. When the browser is opened in a remote workspace, it's now possible to proxy HTTP(S) traffic via the remote connection. This allows you to connect to any ports or services that can only be accessed from the remote machine. If you read our coverage from two weeks ago about VS Code 1.123, you might have seen that extension updates have a two-hour delay as a safety measure. In this update, Microsoft is giving you the ability to configure the time of the delay. You can find it under extensions.autoUpdateDelay. Finally, with this update, admins can deliver managed GitHub Copilot settings through native device management (MDM) channels on Windows and macOS, in addition to account-based enterprise settings files. Settings delivered via MDM appear as policy-enforced in VS Code and can’t be overridden locally. Future updates will extend the supported policy keys across Copilot surfaces. You can download the update from the Visual Studio Code website now.
    • "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
    • This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in a recent interview that the company may have to raise prices on some of its products due to the ongoing memory shortage. While he did not elaborate on the scale of the price hikes, new estimates suggest that Pro iPhone models could become significantly more expensive this fall. The Wall Street Journal and research firm TechInsights have come up with an educated estimate of how much the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost after its launch in September. The estimate is based on current increases in memory and storage chip prices. For starters, the iPhone 18 Pro base model is expected to feature 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. According to TechInsights estimates, 12GB of DRAM for the iPhone 17 Pro cost Apple $39 last year. However, for the iPhone 18 Pro, the cost of the same amount of DRAM could soar to $145. Likewise, 256GB of flash storage that previously cost $13 could now cost around $51. Producing a base iPhone 17 Pro reportedly cost Apple around $582, but TechInsights estimates that the production cost of the iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $726. If Apple wants to maintain the roughly 47% profit margin it enjoys on the iPhone 17 Pro, the base price of the iPhone 18 Pro would need to reach $1,371. After standard pricing adjustments, customers could end up paying around $1,299 for the base model. However, that may not be the end of the story. As we previously reported, the iPhone 18 Pro is said to feature a variable-aperture lens, which could cost Apple at least 50% more than the current camera system. The estimated $1,299 price tag does not include the additional cost of this upgraded camera hardware. Once that expense is factored in, the base model could cost at least $1,399. A $1,399 price tag for the base iPhone 18 Pro would represent a significant increase over the current $1,099 starting price of the iPhone 17 Pro. If Apple wants to keep its upcoming iPhones competitive, it may need to accept lower profit margins.
    • Oh man, but what if I have the PS3 version?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!