Opera: Microsoft's 'minor tweak' of Windows 7 not enough


Recommended Posts

Opera is already installed (with out being an option by the way) by Adobe and their creative suit/dreamweaver and maybe other of their apps. And still cant get market share. That alone should tell them its their product, not another companies fault.

No other company sneaks their browser into your computer.

Really? That I did not know... Nice. Good to know that Opera is so "above board"...

I agree, I always enjoyed having IE as a browser, even though it's not the browser of my choice, it's nice to have something to fall back on. Maybe IE became a little to big to be just bundled with Windows, and would a more minimal, simple, feature-poor (is that a word?) browser be a better implementation. Because, in my opinion, an OS needs a browser as one of the basic available tools, compared to tools as wordpad and paint. How else would I download Firefox?:(

I agree 100%. This is what I've been saying since this whole issue began. There are certain things I expect my operating system to be able to do out of the box. Web browsing is one of the big ones...

Opera can shut up and go to hell.

It would be funny and sad when Opera continues to complain. The game being played here is that Opera wants free advertising. It looks like they won't stop whinging until they get it. Face it, they don't give a rat's *** about "fair competition" or "standards support". This is starting to remind me of the SCO. :rolleyes:

Yep. They want someone else to get their browser out there since they have done such a poor job of doing so... ;)

I wish Opera would stop being that 5 year old keep wanting to get attention.

If they want to gain marketshare. Make a browser worth switching to. I have used there browser time to time even the one in beta and it's nice but it doesn't give anything worth switching from browsers like Firefox, Safari, and Chrome.

fix'd

:laugh:

This is getting ridiculous now... well more ridiculous. If theres a ballot screen then I'd imagine most computer-illiterate users would probably just choose IE anyway because they see it as the internet... The screen could confuse some people as well if they don't know what it is.

Opera need a big warm mug of stfu, which they then need to drown themselves in. It's quite frankly ridiculous MS should have to remove the browser from the operating system AT ALL, and I hope any and all customer complaints regarding its lack of presence in default installs from media are forwarded straight to Opera to answer to. Opera are more than welcome to make an operating system and distribute their browser with it in my opinion, they're also welcome to stump up the six billion dollars plus in development costs.

They've got what they wanted which is bad enough, but trying to ask for core elements of the trident rendering engine to be removed is just stupid. It's relied upon by the core operating system for some pretty important functions, and further relied upon as the embedded html renderer for a lot of other programs (Steam...). They really should just quit while they're ahead. And they still won't get any market share.

Here are some facts. Firefox came in to existence as Firebird with innovative features and rendering speed giving Microsoft's IE6 a run for its money which prompted Microsoft to restart developing IE followed by release of IE7. Even after than Firebird continued to get popular and went on to become firefox as it is today and has been increasing its market share ever since.

Most importantly all this happened while windows shipped with IE6/7 bundled in as default browser which clearly shows people are willing to use a browser if they feel it is worthy irrespective of the status of IE on their system.

So if you want a recent example look at chrome. Its fast and is gaining market share as well. Is that enough or do you need more whiny opera ?

So shut up and start working on improving your browser to compete with the rest instead of being a cry baby.

Poor OPERA! Doesn't still realize that bashing Microsoft won't gain them market share only people would be ****ed off on what they are doing. MS is not forcing anyone to use IE. This is desperate act definitely.

You can flame Opera all you want, but in reality it doesn't matter one god damn bit what Opera's motives are. If Microsoft broke the law, they broke the law, and it will be up to the authorities to decide what course of action to take. I know only about three people on the entire forum will understand this, but whatever.

This has nothing to do with the 90s IE bundling case hdood.. Opera/EU has no basis in the current rehashing of the issue because Firefox proved that IE being included was not anti-competitive. If you have a sucky product the only thing to do is pick on the leader to get free publicity. If you suck you suck. Then theres the EU that pays its employees with the fines it takes from MS and all the rest of the big american companies it goes after.

This has nothing to do with the 90s IE bundling case hdood..

Uh, yes it does.

Opera/EU has no basis in the current rehashing of the issue because Firefox proved that IE being included was not anti-competitive.

That is your personal opinion. The courts disagree. Firefox is not a very good example either, as it is a non-profit volunteer project that arose from the ruins of Netscape (which, in the end, was unable to compete with Microsoft).

If you have a sucky product the only thing to do is pick on the leader to get free publicity. If you suck you suck.

If you break the law, you should be punished. I don't see you people lining up to defend other criminals. It doesn't matter what Opera wants out of it.

Then theres the EU that pays its employees with the fines it takes from MS and all the rest of the big american companies it goes after.

Here comes the conspiracy theories. Isn't there a separate section on the forum for that?

I can't believe you're so god damn naive that you can't even imagine the possibility that the companies that are prosecuted (which are not just American) are actually guilty. Microsoft might make some nice products, but it's not your friend, and it's behavior in the past has been despicable.

You can flame Opera all you want, but in reality it doesn't matter one god damn bit what Opera's motives are. If Microsoft broke the law, they broke the law, and it will be up to the authorities to decide what course of action to take. I know only about three people on the entire forum will understand this, but whatever.

So why don't they go after apple? Mac os + Safari sounds like the same thing.

Anyways, I feel like they're just creating and bending all sorts of laws just to get microsoft on its knees.

People in Europe actually have to buy an OS without a browser now.

maybe in windows 8, they can't even use a GUI, because competetors would like to implement their own custom themes...

I think this whole thing is getting out of hand, and it's a piece of bull****

So why don't they go after apple? Mac os + Safari sounds like the same thing.

Anyways, I feel like they're just creating and bending all sorts of laws just to get microsoft on its knees.

People in Europe actually have to buy an OS without a browser now.

Really? Do explain when Apple held nearly 100% of the OS market and then integrated a product from another market that was previously standalone in an attempt to kill the competition. Oh, that's right, never. In fact, Microsoft even managed to make IE the default on Mac OS, in return for helping Apple out.

Uh, yes it does.

No it does not. MS was punished already for the 90s case by the US DOJ. This is an entirely new case.

That is your personal opinion. The courts disagree. Firefox is not a very good example either, as it is a non-profit volunteer project that arose from the ruins of Netscape (which, in the end, was unable to compete with Microsoft).

That is not my personal opinion. Firefox has succeeded and did so all on their own having just hit their billionth download without the help of any governmental body fining their competition for them. That is FACT and that does PROVE that bundling IE is not anti-competitive, if you have a good enough product to compete with that is.. It does not matter where Firefox came from or who makes it. Netscape just could not make a good enough browser to compete where Mozilla has.

If you break the law, you should be punished. I don't see you people lining up to defend other criminals. It doesn't matter what Opera wants out of it.

The point of Firefox getting their billionth download proves that MS didn't break the law, because if bundling IE with Windows in the era of Firefox is anti-competitive then Firefox should not have succeeded.

I can't believe you're so god damn naive that you can't even imagine the possibility that the companies that are prosecuted (which are not just American) are actually guilty. Microsoft might make some nice products, but it's not your friend, and it's behavior in the past has been despicable.

It sounds like your the one that is naive. If you would take your head out of your ass you would see that the world is not only black and white. There is a perfectly legitimate gray area. Smaller companies complain and cause trouble for larger companies all the time. Especially when they can't develop a product that is as good or better than the one they are trying to compete against. Just seems like you have a chip on your shoulder over companies that find their niche and become and continue to be successful. Large companies should not have to appoligize for being successful.

Look at that, another thread where almost all the whiners are from the 'States.

This is my surprised face.

Er what, on this page alone I see two people from the UK saying Opera and the EU are retarded and one person in favour of Opera/IE's removal from the USA.

Your suprised face needs work.

Look at that, another thread where almost all the whiners are from the 'States.

This is my surprised face.

No one's whining (Aside from Opera of course). I personally would not want an operating system that out of the box couldn't surf the internet. I use Firefox. By running Windows I was not obligated to use IE. I installed a new browser (Not Opera because it sucks...). I tried Opera. I tried Safari. Didn't like either of those. Chrome is O.K... I personally don't think this is doing consumers any favors. It's going to be a pain for them, especially the ones that aren't techie... And now Opera wants Microsoft to rework the OS so that the bits and pieces of IE that the OS uses and are used by other programs aren't necessary? All developers that make use of the IE components should have to rework their applications to make Opera happy? This is becoming ridiculous.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stop asking people that. It's a "No True Scotsman" argument in that you are attempting to discredit the opinions of a person by Attacking the Messenger. The reason that these are logical fallacies is the TRUTH is based on facts as supported by evidence. Nothing else. So, always debate the facts with evidence to reach the truth. Once you learn to do this, you'll be able to recognize when people are fearmongering and lying to you for their own selfish ends.
    • It doesn't matter if you didn't directly hear it from person X or Y. Every one of your statements comes straight from the racist, skinhead, anti-immigrant, be afraid of everything, "they are all taking our jobs", etc. etc. mouthpieces. That's where Farag and Putin heard it from too...and used it against the UK. So, while you keep disavowing the people who publicly peddled that position, you keep proving over and over again that those lies influenced you into being tricked when the Brexit vote came around too. In fact, your final sentence makes it crystal clear that it was the racist/anti-immigrant lies you fell and voted for, since you stated that you didn't have an issue with the economic trade issues with the EU. Ahem. To be clear, all of these LIES are EONS old, mate. They are the same fearmongering lies peddled to the same ignorant, gullible cowards by the same charlatans, snake-oil salesmen, and would be demagogues who've been doing this since caveman Ugh lied about his slightly different neighbor in order to steal his land. And, finally, you answered your own previous question. The reason that the EU isn't clamoring to bring the UK back is that they have had enough of people who would rather shoot themselves in the foot than get over their "insecurity issues". It's the same reason the entire world is moving away from the USA as fast as it can...
    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!