Opera: Microsoft's 'minor tweak' of Windows 7 not enough


Recommended Posts

It sounds like your the one that is naive. If you would take your head out of your ass you would see that the world is not only black and white. There is a perfectly legitimate gray area. Smaller companies complain and cause trouble for larger companies all the time. Especially when they can't develop a product that is as good or better than the one they are trying to compete against. Just seems like you have a chip on your shoulder over companies that find their niche and become and continue to be successful. Large companies should not have to appoligize for being successful.

Good post.

Mozilla was backed by one of the largest IT businesses in the world, notably Google. 85% of their revenue comes from that.

And it now matters where they make their money because? That particular profit comes from searches conducted from WITHIN the Firefox browser. If they were unable to gain market share and get users to use the search built into Firefox, they would not have made that money. The fact that they have made a profit in this way only supports my statement. They have also made some profit by assisting in the development of solutions for other companies (An example would be the new Netscape browser - which I have not used).

And it now matters where they make their money because? That particular profit comes from searches conducted from WITHIN the Firefox browser.

Which is set as the default search engine. If Mozilla changed the default search engine to say, Bing, what do you think would happen to their profits?

If they were unable to gain market share and get users to use the search built into Firefox, they would not have made that money. The fact that they have made a profit in this way only supports my statement.

They already had an established user base - mainly that made up by ex-Netscape users who disliked IE in the first place and alternative operating system users.

If you think I'm an Opera user, you're gravely mistaken - I use Safari. However you'd have to be blind not to see that bundling IE with the operating system was nothing less than an attempt to kill competition, it should've been nipped at the bud but unfortunately EU and DOJ were handless at the time. Unfortunately, in a sense, it was too late for Netscape but I'm sure at least some of the ex-workers there are smiling now.

They have also made some profit by assisting in the development of solutions for other companies (An example would be the new Netscape browser - which I have not used).

I believe the "new" netscape browser was made as a last ditch effort by Netscape to gain any traction they could. But all it was, was a Firefox clone like Flock. They gave up quite some time ago though.

If you think I'm an Opera user, you're gravely mistaken - I use Safari. However you'd have to be blind not to see that bundling IE with the operating system was nothing less than an attempt to kill competition, it should've been nipped at the bud but unfortunately EU and DOJ were handless at the time. Unfortunately, in a sense, it was too late for Netscape but I'm sure at least some of the ex-workers there are smiling now.

I will have to disagree with you on that one.. It was simply one company putting their own product on to another one of their own products. Something any company should have the right to do. And again since Firefox still exists and is still very successful apparently it only hurts competiton when you cant compete in the first place which is the case with Netscape and Opera. If you have a good product obviously you can compete whether IE gets bundled or not.

Edited by statm1

Although Opera can suck it with their ballot screen, it would be just hiiiilarious if they made one without including those whiners. But seriously, they are just acting like kids going "mommy, mommy, no ones noticing me at school! Do Smth!" Too bad Europe is to big of a market, not some small country that ms could pull out all together.

opera can shut up moaning i used to have some respect for opea now ive lost off respect for them

Agreed. Opera have no ground to stand on until they can make a half-decent browser again. Back during the XP days, Opera was the fastest of all the browsers. Now, it's slower then even IE! And I'm talking about Opera 10 with Turbo Mode turned on! Hell, it's even slower than Safari now!

A good product doesn't need promotion (Firefox, anyone?) And Opera should just stop it right now cause what they're doing is just getting ridiculous. If people want to use a different browser they will anyway. I use Firefox, but I can't live without Chrome/IE for my web development stuff etc. An OS without a browser is so 90's, it should not have happened.

Which is set as the default search engine. If Mozilla changed the default search engine to say, Bing, what do you think would happen to their profits?

They already had an established user base - mainly that made up by ex-Netscape users who disliked IE in the first place and alternative operating system users.

If you think I'm an Opera user, you're gravely mistaken - I use Safari. However you'd have to be blind not to see that bundling IE with the operating system was nothing less than an attempt to kill competition, it should've been nipped at the bud but unfortunately EU and DOJ were handless at the time. Unfortunately, in a sense, it was too late for Netscape but I'm sure at least some of the ex-workers there are smiling now.

No, it's perfectly acceptable in my book. They made an Internet Browser, which is a rather important piece of software, especially today. They made an operating system, which is an even more important piece of software; it's likely users will want both. Both were provided. Please observe Apple doing exactly the same practice with Safari - in a proper, sensible, free-market that isn't so retardedly constrained, the relatively market share is irrelevant. It doesn't matter that Windows has something like 95% of the market and OS X around 5%; you shouldn't target the market leader just because they're in front. It's...stupid.

I find Opera's behavior not ok. They should concentrate in creating a great browser experience and stop trying to hurt Microsoft. Why is Firefox so successfull? Despite Microsoft bundling IE Firefox is rising and almost everyone knows about it.

A ballot screen is just a bad idea and people who think it is a good thing, have probably forgotten that Microsoft has the copyright on Windows! They can do with it whatever they want...

We live in an age where the browser is becoming the OS and on the other hand we have Opera (and many others behind it...Google, Mozilla) complaining about IE's integration in Windows. That is ridiculous and shows that these companies do not want to invest their time in creating quality software...They prefer to put time and effort in destroying others..

As far as I am concerned, I won't be using Opera ever again and I have also stopped using Google (the big brother) and Firefox (Google's right hand). Bing is so much better as a search engine and IE8 is also very good.

Technically, browser competition has already been going for awhile. Firefox wouldn't keep gaining marketshare if it wasn't. Opera just hasn't been able to gain any traction.

Yup! +1

Quit whining already!

Opera has its own little successes, every Nintendo DSi comes with an Opera Browser, and the DS and Wii browsers are the only options available and these are Opera.

Opera were the last company to stop charging for their browser, and have not made the right partnerships to succeed in the free browser market.

Firefox has Google and Mozilla

IE has Microsoft

Safari has Apple

Opera has ________ (the EU?)

Anyway, once Microsoft confirm that IE8 will not be available to Windows 7 E users via desktop icons or Windows Update, the EU will have no case to persue anymore, and Opera will be out in the cold and will realise they are not good enough to compete, and will remain a custom browser developer for various devices and will have to settle with that fact.

  • The European Commission does not exist to make someone's "dirty work" as it was implied. There are mechanisms that analyze potential unfair situations ( dominant market position abuse is the case here ).
  • By taking out IE from Windows, Microsoft has not solved anything. On the contrary it has created a lot of issues for users. It will not "restore browser competition on the desktop" with this move.
  • This is nothing more than an attempt to blackmail the European Commission and influence the opinion of Windows users in the EU. I'm sure the European Commission will take the necessary measures to protect its citizens interests in due time.

[...] Why is Firefox so successfull? [...]

They offered a better browser than IE6, and for free. Word spread around quickly, the push for open-source software was the big thing, and devs and users embraced and supported it. :) I remember trying FF2 for the first time. What an awesome browser, but it was such a memory hog on my old laptop after 10 tabs were open that I moved to Opera when it became free (with advertisements :wacko:), but at least it ran like a champ on my old laptop and that was a sacrifice I was willing to make.

Now that I have a new notebook, I may jump back to FF/Chrome. Though I'm so comfortable using Opera now that I don't really see the point.

So Opera want the Trident rendering engine removed from Windows 7 completely?

How does that help competition?

There's quite a few 3rd party browsers that rely on that same rendering engine. Sounds like they want to stifle competition to up their tiny market share.

So Opera want the Trident rendering engine removed from Windows 7 completely?

No, they don't. They want Microsoft to have to offer the user a list of browsers (including IE). This is even stated in the quote in the original poster, but I understand that reading is exceptionally difficult.

Mozilla and Google also support this.

Here we go again. People should just give it a rest already. Last I checked MS got fined and paid money for breaking the law in the EU with regards to IE. So anything after that is up for debate. I can't see how the 2 or 3 of you on the courts side like to sidestep the fact that other browsers can and have been gaining market share all this time regardless of IE being part of windows.

Why didn't the EU ask MS to offer a list of media players last time? Why was that exact same case covering the exact same law-breaking different? Why then was WMP asked to be removed if that wouldn't restore the market?

I don't see any difference between the two cases, the only difference is software. The charges are the same and the verdict is the same. MS following the previous outcome decided not to wait for the EU to move it's slow ass since they have a product to release and just took out IE.

And ofc mozilla and Google support having a list, it's more free adertising for them. You'd be daft to think otherwise. But then, why don't other browsers give me a list of search providers after I install them like IE does now? Last time I used Opera I couldn't even change the search box from Google to something else.

Because you implied that this wasn't about what Microsoft started in the 90s because they'd already been punished for that by the US.

All I said was that it a new case and has nothing to do with the one in the 90s BECAUSE it was between MS and Netscape. Netscape had a case because MS actually did break the law because in that case it was more than just bundling. Go read your history..

So Opera want the Trident rendering engine removed from Windows 7 completely?

No, they don't. They want Microsoft to have to offer the user a list of browsers (including IE). This is even stated in the quote in the original poster, but I understand that reading is exceptionally difficult.

Flipping a switch to simply make IE8 unavailable is not enough for Opera, ...

Kinda sounds like it to me Hdood.. Looks like its pretty difficult for you too. Since this is a quote from the original poster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!