Recommended Posts

While with Windows 7 Microsoft did not need a repeat of Windows Vista, the same is not valid forWindows 8 and its predecessor. Essentially, the Redmond company needs Windows 8, the next major iteration of Windows to fall as close as possible to the Windows 7 tree. Windows 8 needs to be a repeat of Windows 7, at least in terms of market success, although Vista?s successor is delivering a performance that will be very hard to beat. Still, Microsoft?s Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer recently revealed that he believes the software giant will manage to take it to the next level, during the Microsoft Financial Analyst Meeting, at the end of July 2010.

One product ?I think is most important -- it is the most important -- from a financial perspective, and that's Windows. You know, this was an amazing, amazing year. In the sense that Windows is our flagship product, Windows and Windows' success is a tide that floats all boats, so to speak. Suffice to say, I didn't love everything about where we were in the market, say, two years ago. And yet today we launched Windows 7. It got exceptionally well-reviewed. We've got 94 percent customer satisfaction on the product, which is stunning. Sales of Windows 7 PCs have skyrocketed. We built the team that I think has a very strong capability now to repeat -- not easy -- but to repeat the kind of great work that delivered Windows 7 itself, which I think as an investor is an important capability for you to think about,? Ballmer said. (emphasis added)

Of course, Ballmer doesn?t mention Windows 8, per se. But it?s easy to infer what Microsoft?s CEO is referring to from the highlighted segment of text above. The software giant is hard at work building Windows 8 to replace Windows 7, a release which is reportedly planned for 2012, with a Beta possibly coming in mid-2011.

The team references made by Ballmer are extremely interesting. Back in early 2007, just as Windows Vista was launched, Jim Allchin, the head of the project, became Former Co-President, Platforms & Services Division. Microsoft brought in Steven Sinofsky from the Office group, to occupy the position of vice president of the Windows and Windows Live engineering group.

After Windows 7 was wrapped up, Sinofsky was promoted to President, Windows and Windows Live Division, while Bill Veghte, senior vice president for the Windows Business, (the other Windows 7 top dog left the company for Hewlett-Packard). It?s clear that Microsoft credited Sinofsky for the success of Windows 7, but there are additional members of the team that deserve praises, such as Julie Larson-Green, now Corporate Vice President, Windows Experience, and responsible for the look and feel of Windows 7, and future versions of Windows.

At just nine months since it became available at retail, Windows 7 sold over 175 million licenses worldwide, namely in excess of 7 copies of the OS per second. At the start of August 2010, Windows 7?s market share outgrew that of Windows Vista, leaving the platform the second most used OS in the world. Microsoft certainly has high standards with Windows 8.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/926532-windows-8-a-repeat-of-windows-7/
Share on other sites

I think that the period after Vista kicked them into gear.

They were extremely successful with Win7, hopefully they carry this on with Win8 with everything that they've learnt from Win7. They have got the ability to make extremely decent OS's, we've seen this with WinNT, 2000, XP and now Win7 (Vista was good as well in my opinion but was slated by many).

They can do it again.

I just want it to be a change from 7 (Hopefully a new UI), new ways for programs to run etc, the features that have been in posts about it like the easy backup and restore. And for it to be a good value. The reason I got 7 was it was ?50. If it was around ?200 that I believe Vista used to value for, then I would have skipped it/Wait until I got another computer. But Windows 7 is a great OS for a great price. So it will be hard to get something better.

Suggestions of Trends-- one may assume that the following...(personal thoughts as to the direction they could take)

Windows 8 would be built on Windows 7 as far as a general base and user interface.

Already Microsoft has partnered with Twitter (something I read a while back) so may we look to it being more integrated to make easier the "tweets". {not that I use Twitter}

We would hope that Microsoft would finally allow us to change the Colors of the Orb to more match themes. (one thing I hated with XP was a blue theme with a Green Orb- only change was when you would use silver)

An expansion of the use of the Peek to include more programs. Such as Firefox each tab view. (though that one may end up being on Mozilla to gear their work to)

The ability for Windows to be able to go to the web to at least view office documents.

The backing up of files and preferences to be saved to the Sky Drive.

Further improvements to the Library use. To also include folders you frequent.

Smarter Jump List - For example if you move a file it would move the location there and also if you delete a file it would automatically remove it from the Jump List- (I find that some files I view or folders that I move the jump list still lists the old location and WMP will still load up just to tell me that it can't find the file.

The further implementation of some services being delayed to allow faster use of the desktop.

The use of virtualized device drivers to allow for faster recovery of known bad drivers to still allow them to run without them affecting the system.

Those are just my first thoughts about Windows 8 after seeing the changes between win3.11-(nt4.0)Win95-98-ME-2000-XP-Vista-7 .

Also they would firm up what their soft points are.

I don't think it will be a Repeat but more or less a refinement.

Some other thoughts based on what they could include- that is in Microsoft Research.

http://research.micr...&a=&pn=&pa=&pd=

Microsoft Image Composite Editor is an advanced panoramic image stitcher. Given a set of overlapping photographs of a scene shot from a single camera location, the application creates a high-resolution panorama that seamlessly combines the original images.

The Social Web Experience browser plug-in analyzes Web pages to identify key topics on the current page and match them with relevant conversations and other content from the user's social network. Matches are shown as in-line pop-ups.
That one they would probably more incorporate into the operating system since most users now are on Social networks.

Also I wish I could find it but I saw a web browser Microsoft showcased recently that would allow you to virtually see each page and arrange them and discard what is not important.- not an alternative for IE9 but more or less could be adapted for use to do local files since a good portion of users have large amounts of Songs-Images- and movies.

I just remembered it--

Microsoft Pivot- would be adapted for use in the operating system.

http://www.getpivot.com/

Here at Live Labs we’re all about experiments, and Pivot is our most ambitious to date. Pivot makes it easier to interact with massive amounts of data in ways that are powerful, informative, and fun. We tried to step back and design an interaction model that accommodates the complexity and scale of information rather than the traditional structure of the Web

Plus adding what is found here-

http://livelabs.com/

Just some thoughts.

UI is the biggest thing I really want, something close or similar to the Copenhagen concept or something slimlined like 7. But not nothing like Metro. Metro is fine for apps and mobile. For a whole OS... Just no.

But the features I have seen in posts...

Backup - 1 button press and it backup files, reinstalls windows and keeps stuff (Would be one of the revolutionary things)

App Store - Easy place to download apps, like on iOS but a full computer version.

Better Updates - So it does not restart after nearly all of them!

Customisation - More 3rd party theme support, like what can be done now like changing the whole theme and the start orb. Sometime's the flag orb can get a little boring. So now I'm on just the flag as my start button.

And More, that's the stuff we need.

  • 4 months later...

I think they should offer free cloud services and cloud based versions of win8 otherwise they might lose market share to google

Cloud based versions? So clunky slow virtual machines?

And they already offer cloud services - many of which beat Google's offering.

I think for the UI it is best to look at IE9. IE's previously been an indicator of UI trends for Windows and IE9 uses more Aero and more Metro-inspired elements. I think that's where we'll be at Windows 8.

Imo, I don't think they should change anything too major... sure maybe minor improvements but there's a reason XP was as successful as it was which is due it's longevity and it being improved so much and I honestly think that's all Windows 7 needs for the next 4-5 years easily. There's no real need for something new yet. They've done it and if they wanna go strolling into Vista fiasco again, I guess by all means go for it.

I heard a rumor that Windows 8 will resurrect PC gaming, but I think it will be too little/too late. That said, Microsoft had better bring something revolutionary over Windows 7 to convince me to upgrade. I'd better not have to buy another whole new computer just to run it either.

With how smooth 7 runs, 8 would need a super beautiful GUI to make me update :p

same here, windows 7 is pretty amazing to me. if microsoft go with a metro type feel or zune UI for 8 then i will pass. ill use windows 7 for a few more years and if worse comes to worse ill go linux or apple. im HUGE into customization on my pc and mobile devices.

please explain?

It was a question rather than a statement really, I wasn't sure what you meant by cloud-based versions of Windows. Did you mean all of the data and applications are run on the cloud? If so then that just sounds like an OS that is simply an RDC into a virtual machine housed at Microsoft which would be slow and a bit clunky.

But I guess that's not what you meant?

Imo, I don't think they should change anything too major... sure maybe minor improvements but there's a reason XP was as successful as it was which is due it's longevity and it being improved so much and I honestly think that's all Windows 7 needs for the next 4-5 years easily. There's no real need for something new yet. They've done it and if they wanna go strolling into Vista fiasco again, I guess by all means go for it.

oh please , we don't went stagnation again ala XP

I heard a rumor that Windows 8 will resurrect PC gaming, but I think it will be too little/too late. That said, Microsoft had better bring something revolutionary over Windows 7 to convince me to upgrade. I'd better not have to buy another whole new computer just to run it either.

PC gaming are alive and kicking.

any revolutionary windows release = higher PC requirement , more application breakage

the bare minimum would be dual core processor at any rate :p

Surely though, as OS's advance, so will the ability to create new, better ones, as the OS they are using to create them on, is itself better ?

Vista created using an XP machine ?

7 created using a Vista Machine

Windows 8 created using a 7 Machine ?

Is that how it works ?

Surely though, as OS's advance, so will the ability to create new, better ones, as the OS they are using to create them on, is itself better ?

Vista created using an XP machine ?

7 created using a Vista Machine

Windows 8 created using a 7 Machine ?

Is that how it works ?

They tend to build ontop of the other, yeah. I think Vista was built ontop of Server 2003 though.

Building on top of doesn't mean it's better in itself though; they may break things, remove things, add stuff nobody wants or make them slower or uglier.

Stagnation in what form ?

If you're implying windows rot that effected XP ... been fixed pretty much but that was prevented with common maintenance.

you got me wrong , i mean as tech

XP stayed too long for it own good.

in another word softwares are still way from perfect . rapid OS improvement > revolutionary release

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!