Oracle sues Google over Android operating system


Recommended Posts

In a clash of two Silicon Valley titans, Oracle said Thursday that it has filed a federal copyright lawsuit alleging that Google's popular Android operating system was built on Oracle's Java software without permission.

Android, which was first released in late 2008, is used by several computer manufacturers as the operating system that runs smartphones and other computing devices. Oracle's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, accuses Google of infringing on patents and copyrights that Oracle acquired when it bought Sun Microsystems earlier this year.

Google had no immediate comment.

But one analyst called the lawsuit surprising because Sun, whose engineers developed Java, decided several years ago to release key elements of the widely used programming language under an open-source license which allows others to use it freely.

"Java is essential for Android," said Al Hilwa, a software expert at the IDC research firm. "But a big chunk of Java is open-source. Since Android has been out there for more than a year, most people would have expected they were in compliance with whatever license terms apply."

Android's growth in the first half of 2010 has been enormous, with Google CEO Eric Schmidt saying last week that more than 200,000 smartphones powered by Google's mobile operating system are being activated around the world each day. Gartner, a prominent research firm, said Thursday that Android is

now the most popular smartphone operating system in the United States, and is on the verge of becoming the second most popular in the world, closing in on Research In Motion's Blackberry.

All four major U.S. wireless carriers now offer smartphones powered by Android,.

While just 1.8 percent of the world's smartphones were running Android in the second quarter of 2009, Android now has 17.2 percent of the worldwide smartphone share, or 10.6 million phones, just behind RIM's 18.2 percent and 11.2 million phones, according to the Gartner report. Nokia's Symbian remains the world most popular smartphone operating system at 41.2 percent of the global market, but both Android and Apple's iPhone are rapidly eating into the market share of Nokia, RIM and Microsoft Windows Mobile phones.

Android's growth means more search revenue for Google, as consumers use their smartphones to search the web. Google does not break out its revenue from mobile search, but Google searches from Android devices grew by 300 percent during the first half of 2010, Jonathan Rosenberg, a Google senior vice president, recently told analysts.

The first Android phone, the T-Moble G1, went on sale in October 2008, and Android phones are now available in about 50 different countries.

Source

But one analyst called the lawsuit surprising because Sun, whose engineers developed Java, decided several years ago to release key elements of the widely used programming language under an open-source license which allows others to use it freely.

I guess now Oracle is planning to take it back?

Exactly...and how much do you even here about Oracle anymore? Seems to me Oracle just wants to be "heard"

Oracle are still doing well. All the key factors for them (revenue, equity, etc) are up.

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.

So I suppose everyone who now opposes this action where Google/android uses a non standard Java VM(it's not even a true VM) Also thought Sun where total a-holes when they sued MS for the MS Java WM ?

otherwise it'd be a bit hypocritical, since this violation of the Java TOS is significantly worse than the MS one.

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?

I suppose the difference is that others support actual (Oracle) Java platforms like J2ME. Android does not. Android does not implement any standard Java platform, and is not even capable of running Java bytecode.

It's essentially a custom platform that just happens to use the Java programming language (with support for some standard Java libraries.) Software written for Oracle's Java platforms can't run on Android, and vice versa. They are incompatible, both in source code and executable form.

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.

Google makes plenty of money from it. Profit is the sole reason Android exists.

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.

Because android doesn't run Java apps. It turns dex files, in dalvik. dalvik is a special java "runtime" that runs the pre compiled dex files on Android and doesn't support the full java spec. it's written specifically for Android and uses the java language for the code, but doesn't run java apps. hence it doesn't follow the rules you agree to when using the java language or writing a java interpreter as they're supposed to be fully cross platform and support all the java language.

Google should have done the right thing and just made dalvik use their own special language instead of java and they'd be safe. But as usual google just plows ahead ignoring other peoples copyrights and hard work.

You mean the hard work that Oracle brought into, rather than developed themselves? Ah yeah, wouldn't want to undo that, would we.

Android is not what is broken here, it is the US patent system that needs reform.

I quite agree with you, we need to fix the broken patent system.

Oracle is doing quite fine.

They have every right to ask for retribution, knowing that Schmidt has used their source code for Android.

May be doing fine but you dont hear from them very often. Besides, most of the Java platform is open source so they will have to prove that whatever Android used, is not open.

it's written specifically for Android and uses the java language for the code, but doesn't run java apps. hence it doesn't follow the rules you agree to when using the java language or writing a java interpreter as they're supposed to be fully cross platform and support all the java language.

What "rules" are these though? Is there any evidence that Google entered into a contract with Oracle where these conditions were present?

But as usual google just plows ahead ignoring other peoples copyrights and hard work.

Copyright applies to the implementation. Did Google actually illegally use other people's code?

Because android doesn't run Java apps. It turns dex files, in dalvik. dalvik is a special java "runtime" that runs the pre compiled dex files on Android and doesn't support the full java spec. it's written specifically for Android and uses the java language for the code, but doesn't run java apps. hence it doesn't follow the rules you agree to when using the java language or writing a java interpreter as they're supposed to be fully cross platform and support all the java language.

Google should have done the right thing and just made dalvik use their own special language instead of java and they'd be safe. But as usual google just plows ahead ignoring other peoples copyrights and hard work.

Thanks HawkMan thats a good explanation. I didn't realise that making your own interpreter/runtime for Java was a problem.

Exactly...and how much do you even here about Oracle anymore? Seems to me Oracle just wants to be "heard"

Oracle doesn't need to be heard, those who matter know about oracle. They're still everywhere, doing business, and still making acquisitions etc lol

Thanks HawkMan thats a good explanation. I didn't realise that making your own interpreter/runtime for Java was a problem.

It shouldn't be, unless you violated any patents, used actual code belonging to someone else, or based the implementation on documentation (trade secrets) supplied under a contract that had various requirements, or violated antitrust regulations (see Microsoft.) I don't know what Google did, but there should be nothing illegal about a clean room implementation (patents aside), so at least in principle it is possible to create one that is as incompatible as you want.

Looks like Oracle doesn't like Java being fully open sourced, not shocked there.

There was an article a while back about Google Andriod and Java. (Can't find link)

It boiled down to this, Google (and other's) wanted to use Java differently then suns "standards".

Sun caved in and created exceptions with a special java designation / name, but really didn't want to.

Open Souce means this - if Google alters the java code, they have to make the altered code available to anyone that wants has it.

Other people then can use your code without your permission any changes they do they have to give the code oit.

May be doing fine but you dont hear from them very often. Besides, most of the Java platform is open source so they will have to prove that whatever Android used, is not open.

I haven't really kept up with Java but that's what I thought. Java is open source so how can they sue if the code is published (unless it violates something like the GNU license or whatever license Java runs under)?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I bought one of these last year. I really hope I won't have to deal with this crap. My drive is in good condition at the moment.
    • Umm, read my answer again! If you have something to add or contribute, feel free. Otherwise my point was that you apparently dont want faster updates... so you want slower updates by process of elimination. If you have something to contribute, meaningful answers are better.
    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!