Premiere, Final Cut? Other?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, in my 3rd year of college as a Mass Media major. We are getting into more editing and hands on classes; this first class the teacher stresses Adobe Premiere. "I you know Premiere you can do AVID, final cut etc". Might have something to do with the fact that in this specific lab we're on Windows Machines with the CS5 suite installed. But as a student going into the field in the near future (hopefully) I am curious about differences in the software.

Adobe Premiere?

AVID?

Final Cut / Studio

...

many more I'm sure I haven't heard of. What is most prominent in the field? What do you find easiest / most feature-rich?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/951808-premiere-final-cut-other/
Share on other sites

I like Premiere, but I have to agree, Avid is better, Final Cut sucks IMHO. What I find is Avid has a better interface. It's much quicker to get work done with. I have also never encountered annoying bugs with it that halt your production. I'm more of a sound guy and can say this is why I choose Pro-Tools and Nuendo over cheaper solutions. The cheaper solutions can do the job just fine, but it's worth it if you value your time (and compatibility with companies) to use the industry standards. They are standards (usually) for a reason.

  • 1 month later...

Avid is now the industry leader for editing. There's many reasons for this but basically they started in the 1980s as the first Non-Linear software based editor. The feature set on Avid is great and the interface is simple to use. There's more of a technical reasoning behind it and I'll try to post back later with more information.

  • 1 month later...

Speaking as a former Premirre/Premiere Pro beta tester I have to agree; if you want to do studio work AVID is the tool to learn with FCP running second. You might also want to add Autodesk's Maya 3D Animation to your resume & toolkit.

This isn't to say you shouldn't learn them all. When James Cameron did Avatar he used different tools at different stages of the process. His toolbox included (primarily) AVID, Photoshop, After Effects, Premiere Pro (rough composites & cutlists via its AVID AAF import capability), Lightroom and Acrobat Connect as a collaboration tool.

I can't say anything about the others you listed but I use Premiere Pro CS5, not the best but for what I use it for (uni coursework mainly) it's not bad and 64 bit only, along with the Autodesk Software Suite.

Speaking as a former Premirre/Premiere Pro beta tester I have to agree; if you want to do studio work AVID is the tool to learn with FCP running second. You might also want to add Autodesk's Maya 3D Animation to your resume & toolkit.

This isn't to say you shouldn't learn them all. When James Cameron did Avatar he used different tools at different stages of the process. His toolbox included (primarily) AVID, Photoshop, After Effects, Premiere Pro (rough composites & cutlists via its AVID AAF import capability), Lightroom and Acrobat Connect as a collaboration tool.

Agreed, but isn't it better to learn how to use as many of them as possible?

Within the limits of your individual neural net, perhaps ;)

Personally, I find Premiere Pro tedious to use due to its UI inconsistancies & "isms". Complain as the betas did when PPro 1.0 was in testing, it was like talking to a wall :p

Given a choice I'd rather use AVID or FCP.

  • 2 months later...

WOW so many people swearing by Avid! I am in India and here FCP is the choice for movie and TV editing, Avid still is little used. Premiere has its own share of problems and im sure FCP X will give the edge that apple needs over Avid.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Back when Adobe Premiere was the only editing software I used, I had love it. I was familiar with the layout from photoshop, and using it with After Effects worked out great. Lately though, even Sony Vegas beats Premiere by leaps and bounds. Years later, now that I have had time to play with all of the major editing suites, the popular vote seems to be the correct one. If you have the resources its:

1)Avid

2)Final Cut Pro (Although I have not used version 10. Heard it was awful., not sure if the issues were fixed)

3)Sony Vegas (What I am currently using since I cannot afford Avid, but I love it)

4) Adobe Premire (I guess.. lol)

Coming from a fairly amateur video editor, I've had nothing but problem with Premiere. Sony Vegas gives me no problems with resolution issues, and uploading to Youtube is super easy. Best thing to do is play around with them all, see what fits your personal needs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!