Rift MMO


Recommended Posts

I got invited to beta as well, but with me back playing wow I didn't accept it. Please post your thoughts on it compared to the other big mmo's out. Whats the price point? Post us some screenies. I want to see the interface.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540402
Share on other sites

played it today. Not bad as long as its free cause if not i can just play RoM. same thing different name.

I believe their FAQ says it will have a subscription on release.

As for the game itself, it was definitely interesting, with the multiclass system (you get up to 3 subclasses of your main class, and can mix and match skills from all 3 to customize your class in a way), but the multiclass system seemed kind of repetitive. The first class combination I made, I started with blade dancer, then went riftstalker or whatever, and it seemed like the skills were identical almost. They had different damage types, but they did virtually the same damage and worked in the same way. Then I went Ranger Bard after that which was pretty cool, slow damage but at a certain point your main damage skill heals you while it does damage, so you essentially kill slower than the more direct damage classes, but you constantly heal yourself while killing. You also get a pet due to the Ranger class which can tank an additional mob long enough for you to kill the one attacking you then kill the mob attacking your pet.

It was a fun game, more polished than most beta's, but I think the multiclass system is a little too complex with some combinations being pretty crappy, and generally not worth the subscription that will come later (though IMHO no MMO is worth a subscription, not even WoW).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540442
Share on other sites

How does it play in the idea of instancing, is it like Guild Wars where the towns are grouped however, the world is an instance or is it open world like WoW?

It's like WoW, world is open (which was annoying as hell in the Beta because the lower level zones were overcrowded and everyone was fighting over spawns), with instanced zones that I assume work similar to raids (only one was available when I played the beta and I didn't nolife the game to get to it).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540482
Share on other sites

oh that reminds me a friend said there's a 3 hour raid instance at level 20. sounds absolutely retarded to me, but he he championed how good it was because he got 2 levels in it and "raiding isn't just an endgame activity" in rift. idk personally i can't sit still for 3 hours straight without going afk for a few minutes and especially at level 20.

people seem to think based on beta that leveling will be fast. i'm not sure what the level cap is but in my experience leveling slows down after beta caps.

the rifts sound kinda cool but also kind of annoying. basically a rift spawns and mobs run out and if players don't fight them they spread to quests hubs and kill all your quest givers. and if players continue to ignore them they spread to the towns and kill everything there too. players are supposed to group up to beat them but if they don't there are npc's you can hire to help you fight them solo.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540494
Share on other sites

oh that reminds me a friend said there's a 3 hour raid instance at level 20. sounds absolutely retarded to me, but he he championed how good it was because he got 2 levels in it and "raiding isn't just an endgame activity" in rift. idk personally i can't sit still for 3 hours straight without going afk for a few minutes and especially at level 20.

people seem to think based on beta that leveling will be fast. i'm not sure what the level cap is but in my experience leveling slows down after beta caps.

the rifts sound kinda cool but also kind of annoying. basically a rift spawns and mobs run out and if players don't fight them they spread to quests hubs and kill all your quest givers. and if players continue to ignore them they spread to the towns and kill everything there too. players are supposed to group up to beat them but if they don't there are npc's you can hire to help you fight them solo.

I never made it to the raid, but 3 hours is a long time for a level 20 raid, perhaps it simply doesn't feel like an "endgame activity" in the beta because he knows it's only a beta and what he was playing was only the endgame for the beta? Basically he played one of the highest level areas in the beta and he presumes raiding won't be an endgame activity because of how populated that raid area was due to it being towards the end of the beta?

I don't think leveling will slow much, but I know the cap will go up. I want to say up to around level 50 or 70 or something but that could be a number I am thinking from a different game. Pretty sure something about the cap was talked about in their FAQ or forums or somewhere though.

Rifts were kinda stupid during the beta, any time a rift opened up you had like 10+ people in the area that swarmed to it. Even without being in a party the players generally outnumbered the monsters 2:1 so the rifts always closed quickly. There was a point during the first beta where there was talk of a rift taking over a town, but I didn't make it that far into the game.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540618
Share on other sites

I never made it to the raid, but 3 hours is a long time for a level 20 raid, perhaps it simply doesn't feel like an "endgame activity" in the beta because he knows it's only a beta and what he was playing was only the endgame for the beta? Basically he played one of the highest level areas in the beta and he presumes raiding won't be an endgame activity because of how populated that raid area was due to it being towards the end of the beta?

I don't think leveling will slow much, but I know the cap will go up. I want to say up to around level 50 or 70 or something but that could be a number I am thinking from a different game. Pretty sure something about the cap was talked about in their FAQ or forums or somewhere though.

Rifts were kinda stupid during the beta, any time a rift opened up you had like 10+ people in the area that swarmed to it. Even without being in a party the players generally outnumbered the monsters 2:1 so the rifts always closed quickly. There was a point during the first beta where there was talk of a rift taking over a town, but I didn't make it that far into the game.

the guy who said the thing about the raids at level 20... idk i can't trust his opinion sometimes. he said STO beta was bad and then bought an LTS for it and CO, and mostly just played dress up in STO.

idk, people ALWAYS says x mmo has fast leveling in beta based on how fast the early levels go, and almost every single mmo goes live and the cap lifted and as soon as people get past the beta cap they start moaning about how grindy it is and how much it slows down. that being said there4 are always the .5% of players who grind out to max level in 2 weeks after launch no matter how grindy it is.

that's interesting and seems to contradict whtat the guy said about his beta experience with the rifts. but that's the guy who talk about level 20 raids too.

most of what i'm going by here is second hand information, unfortunately. i had a beta key and keep getting invite emails for it, but the beta was timed to coincide with cata launch, which i can help but feel is a stupid move on teh part of the devs. they could've moved it one month forward or back and had so much better timing instead of trying to go head to head for player interest with the 2000 lb elephant in the room.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540650
Share on other sites

idk, people ALWAYS says x mmo has fast leveling in beta based on how fast the early levels go, and almost every single mmo goes live and the cap lifted and as soon as people get past the beta cap they start moaning about how grindy it is and how much it slows down. that being said there4 are always the .5% of players who grind out to max level in 2 weeks after launch no matter how grindy it is.

Yeah, most MMOs generally have an experience curve where the higher level you get the slower you level. I suppose it is no different in Rift, it's just that the beta cap is low enough you don't feel that much of a slowdown.

that's interesting and seems to contradict whtat the guy said about his beta experience with the rifts. but that's the guy who talk about level 20 raids too.
I never made it past level 12 or so because I kept making different characters to try out different class combinations, but every rift I was in had at least 10+ people killing stuff in the rift, these were also areas though where there were generally 20+ people you could see from any specific spot on the map and you had to fight over respawning mobs. The higher level areas probably were much more barren and rifts were probably more troublesome. The rifts are a great idea, and I like the way the landscape changes when they appear, but in the beta at least they were super easy to destroy and really weren't much fun.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593540926
Share on other sites

That's way too many classes, or builds or whatever they call it. Seems like that would be ridiculously confusing.

It is......the game makes suggestions of what classes go together but like what I ran into with my first character, two classes that were almost identical in terms of skills. It was either level up one class only, or level both classes and get identical skills for the first 10 levels or so.

Pretty sweet game but there is an NDA people.

I don't see anything in this thread that has not already been talked about openly before on other sites. Sure there is an NDA, but it's not like people are posting screenshots or videos of the game in this thread.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593541042
Share on other sites

Eh, i don't think i can play it long term. I hate to say it, but after playing WoW i just expect certain things of MMOs and, well, this does not have them.

Pros:

Extremely stable game, best beta i've seen.

Many classes

Story is more interesting than most MMOs

UI is pretty good

Cons:

Many classes feel the same

Does not feel "unique", while playing all i could think was "i can play a game like this, but better, if i log onto WoW"

Graphics do not have a strong art style = will not hold up over time

Races are not very unique - on the bad side you have a human, a evil elf and a big human. On the good you have a human, an elf and a dwarf.

It pretty much outright tells you what class combinations are good, thus you will end up seeing many archetypes.

Story, while better then most, is still nothing to write home about. Evil people invade world, two factions think it needs to be saved different ways.

everything i use looks the same. In WoW (hate to keep using it as an example, but the games are alike), if i cast storm strike on my shammy it's apparent, if i use __ heal or __ ability i can tell, as it has a prominent and easy to spot graphic. On my Reaver (the death knights of Rift) all of my abilities were pretty much the exact same thing. I have 2 diseases, then 5 moves that just hit for damage. It literally just became me pressing whatever i wanted because they were just all clones with slightly changed damage. I'm usually not a fan of melee classes, though, so i'll try making a caster on the other faction and see how it is.

Overall: I don't see this game being more than just another face in the crowd. It tries to be a combination of different MMOs which might work if it came from an established franchise in gaming, but since it's a new IP with a new backstory (that is fairly boring) it does not have much going for it.

What i see the problem as is that, yeah it's a good MMO compared to the ones that have come out recently. But it's still a MMO, and it needs to compete with juggernauts. To even have a chance of taking population from things like LoTRO, WoW and such you need to make a splash and have something going for you that the others don't have. This game is a mash up of various MMOs, but it's still not.. "revolutionary", it does the things it wants to well, but it has nothing to draw me away from games with more content, players and budgets.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593541144
Share on other sites

i invited some people to my mumble server to do this beta on if they wanted. dunno what the turn out will be like because suspect one of the posters doing beta doesn't want to lose admin right he has on his vent server and try out mumble and possibly pming his info around there.

if anyone wants the info if you're a solo beta player and want some company, at the very leas ti should be online playing wow or borderlands tonight, so just pm me for the info.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/964524-rift-mmo/#findComment-593568032
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!