What version do the DUTCHIES want?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. What version do the DUTCHIES want?

    • AutoPatcher for MS Windows XP PRO SP1?
      3
    • AutoPatcher for MS Windows XP PRO SP2?
      72
    • AutoPatcher for MS Windows XP HOME SP1?
      0
    • AutoPatcher for MS Windows XP HOME SP2?
      6


Recommended Posts

Tested Autopatcher Dutch August during break.

Didn't work.

After trying half an hour, i discovered the problem: my colleague is still working with SP1. Seems the program is good protected! I should have seen it on the startup screen!

Ill try tomorrow on an other pc.

FLM

586518118[/snapback]

You could have seen it on the downloaded file name!

My brother used the file after reinstalling his windows.

He says it works like a charm.

Only one update file after using the program.

FLM

586523608[/snapback]

Then thank you bro from me for using AutoPatcher. And I would like to thank you for testing it.

Stay tuned, coming up next........AutoPatcher Septemberrrrrrrrrrr!

- Anyone discovered any problems with the Dutch AutoPatcher August release?

- Are the descriptions that I made for the tweaks helpfull and clear?

- Is it a clear / well-ordered arrangement / lay-out?

Feed me and let me know!

586538255[/snapback]

Wasn't able to do the test on an XP PROF SP2 machine, but did the test on an XP HOME SP2 machine.

The tweaks look helpfull and clear, sometimes the translation is a bit strange, but i wouldn't do it better!

I just have a question about the updates: what's the difference between the "black" updates and the "blue" updates?

I looked at the forum, but couldn't immediately find an explanation.

What i found stranger, is the possibility to maximize the screen was disabled!? When you open a lot of options, the screen is to small, and i had to manually adapt the size.

Keep up the good work. I burned the update on a cd, so i can update someone having problems with his XP full off "leaks".

FLM

Wasn't able to do the test on an XP PROF SP2 machine, but did the test on an XP HOME SP2 machine.

The tweaks look helpfull and clear, sometimes the translation is a bit strange, but i wouldn't do it better!

I just have a question about the updates: what's the difference between the "black" updates and the "blue" updates?

I looked at the forum, but couldn't immediately find an explanation.

What i found stranger, is the possibility to maximize the screen was disabled!? When you open a lot of options, the screen is to small, and i had to manually adapt the size.

Keep up the good work. I burned the update on a cd, so i can update someone having problems with his XP full off "leaks".

FLM

586557529[/snapback]

you asked:

I just have a question about the updates: what's the difference between the "black" updates and the "blue" updates?

I looked at the forum, but couldn't immediately find an explanation.

My answer:

take a look here for more info

you noticed:

What i found stranger, is the possibility to maximize the screen was disabled!? When you open a lot of options, the screen is to small, and i had to manually adapt the size.

My answer to that:

dunno :cry: have to take a closer look at that. Can you tell what you tweaks you have installed?

My answer:

take a look here for more info

Just didn't look in the right place!!

My answer to that:

dunno  :cry:  have to take a closer look at that. Can you tell what you tweaks you have installed?

I don't remember all of the tweaks i have installed. I just looked at all of them and indicated the ones that interested me: maximum number of downloads 2 -> 10; dosprompt here; ...

FLM

  • 2 weeks later...
  :angry: Now I now why the Dutchies are not posting here, they created a forum to talk about the problems and so on. I'm not happy with that at the first place. The second is that they didn't name the webiste, the credits, etc. Should I answer you question here so you can translate it and post it on the forum? AutoPatcher has his own forum :angry:

I think that it's time to send email to the moderators!!!!! :D

For the people who like to know what I'm talking about, here is the url to take a look at it. http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/10336 keep in mind that this is in Dutch.

so I've installed the full version and since then every time I double click on a folder or a device in my computer it prompts me the Command window. So I installed the autopatcher again to find out how to uninstall it but I just can't find the patch that did this in the list. Can someone help me with this? Thanks

so I've installed the full version and since then every time I double click on a folder or a device in my computer it prompts me the Command window. So I installed the autopatcher again to find out how to uninstall it but I just can't find the patch that did this in the list. Can someone help me with this? Thanks

586613598[/snapback]

I think that you have installed the tweak [dutch] "De command-prompt (MS-DOS venster) starten voor folders en schijven" [/dutch] it's available in your contextmenu. If you want to undo it, use the Tweak Undo.exe and select the tweak that you have installed.

But a Double Click? That's new for me........

normally double click is bound to explore or open, now double click is linked to 'open command window' since this one is in the top of the list.

I cant find it in the undo list...

586614002[/snapback]

If all went okay, this should be your contextmenu, right?

post-101056-1128339483.png

allright, great, I went to regedit so there I found the proporties for my foldersettings, I removed cmd, so now the find-function is default, everytime I double click a folder it opens the find function. Could a regedit expert help me please :)

586614059[/snapback]

Tell me, what are the problems in this registry paradise?

You just deleted a default value in your registry to open folder / map. Due this action the only value left is "find". You have to tell what you removed form the registry!

Edited by DaFlapDrol

my context menu looks like this:

  • Open command window here
    Zoeken...
    Verkennen
    Openen

same for both devices as folders

now the regedit part

Deze computer\HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\

this map contains the following subfolders

  • cmd
    find
    foobar2000.enqueue
    foobar2000.play

so what I did is, I removed the top one "cmd" so now my default is find

note that the double click > cmd-line does only occure when I'm in windows explorer right field of the screen, in the left field, the explore field is working properly

my context menu looks like this:
  • Open command window here
    Zoeken...
    Verkennen
    Openen

same for both devices as folders

If you first option in your context menu is the way you tolled here, it seems that you have installed the PowerToy Open Command Window Here....... Am I right? I know that you send me something about it by PM. So?

allright, problem solved, microsoft is familiar with this problem

check this link for more info

586620804[/snapback]

@Jeroen,

In your case this is a workaround! I have installed the Powertoy "Open Command Window Here" and all works as it should be. No problems like you had. You did a manual remove from the registry. If you did this through Control Panel, add/remove software you wouldn't have any problem.

Anyway, it's working for you now ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!