Enable Concurrent Sessions in XP SP2 RC1


Recommended Posts

OK, so I really wanted this feature on my computer but didn't want to be stuck on SP2 beta 1 until longhorn comes out (4051 has concurrent sessions enabled by default BTW), so I started snooping around the system32 folder in Windows XP. After finding the dlls controlling terminal services, I spent the last 2 days downloading the full xpsp2.exe beta 1. I grabbed the 2 files (that I found while searching) that were related to terminal services and started some testing.

My Results (and how to enable concurrent sessions)

1. First, open regedit and navigate to the key HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\Licensing Core

2. Create a new Registry DWORD called "EnableConcurrentSessions" and assign it a value of 1

3. Open a command prompt and delete termsrv.dll from %systemroot%\ServicePackFiles\i386\

4. Still in the command prompt, rename termsrv.dll in system32 to something else (like termsrv.old)

5. (key step) Copy termsrv.dll from SP2 beta 1 (build 2055) to system32

6. reboot

Multiple sessions should now be enabled on your machine. Note: you must have the welcome screen and fast user switching enabled for concurrent sessions to function properly.

a word of caution: this causes the termsrv.dll file to be outdated, and it won't include any of the fixes that the RC1 file has had since beta 1. I don't know of any security fixes or bugs that have been patched in Sp2 for terminal services, so its not a big deal for me. But for others this may not be so. It would be nice if someone would throw the two dlls in some kind of decompiler, find the differences between the two, and possibly create a fix for current versions of the dll.

Hrrm - I wonder if that means users of those 'Smart Displays' will be able to use both at once :/. My reasoning is that when smart displays were released, it figured that they used remote desktop to work.

yes, that was what prompted the inclusion of concurrent sessions in SP2. But they took it out in later buidls and decided to add that functionality in a later smart display update

  • 2 weeks later...

FYI - just upgraded from SP1 to SP2 RC1 (2096) and concurrent sessions was enabled and working with the instructions posted at the top of this thread... until I installed the Microsoft Updates for SP2 RC1 and then it didn't work anymore. (termsrv.dll was not replaced by the updates... still was 2055 one)

So, I began uninstalling the updates one at a time from the bottom of the list in "Add/Remove Programs - show updates" - after I uninstalled the 2nd one from the bottom (sorry, don't remember the exact name of it but it was a March Beta patch I think) I had concurrent users working again in SP2. Yes! Back in business.

It sure would be nice to know which file was replaced in that beta to break concurrent sessions. If someone knows please post here.

Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried the termsvr.dll 2055 with XP Pro SP1 and the registry change to see if concurrent sessions automaticly come to life in SP1?

I'd really like to get remote access into a media server PC I built, but I don't want to royally screw it up if bad things happen. It's been countless hours and may tweaks to get the thing right, and while I'd love to log in from the laptop while I'm using the machine via the TV, I'm gun shy.

Any one up for trying?

Charlie

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Moreover, the Writing Tools in macOS 27 are now powered by Siri AI, allowing users to draft emails and other content, as well as request feedback on specific pieces of text." APPLESLOP !!! or because its Apple, so its Okay 😉
    • Been using Outlook all my Life on Windows,  But Classic Outlook---Briefly Tried NEW Outlook, but wasn't to my tastes, but i feel if and when forced to switch in the future--i could get used to it if  i had to   
    • Apple has clarified Series 9 was left off the watchOS 27 compatibility list by mistake.
    • Signal accuses UK government of using child safety as cover for mass surveillance by David Uzondu Recently, the UK's Home Office announced a sweeping set of proposals to make Britain the "first country in the world" where children cannot share or view nude photos on their smart devices, an initiative that authorities claim will protect children from online predators and combat pornography. In response, Signal believes that while the government must keep children "safe" and "protected," it should do so through social services and education, not by "surveillance, funding cuts, and cover-ups." The company called the plan "dystopian" and warned that it violates everyone's fundamental right to privacy, arguing that scanning on the presumption of nudity will only strengthen the market dominance and data control of giant corporations like Apple and Google. The statement continues by accusing the government of hiding its true intentions under the guise of child safety. Signal argues that the Home Office is building an invisible surveillance infrastructure that remains ripe for exploitation by future administrations and authoritarian regimes. According to the company, this aggressive approach completely ignores the actual needs of young people, such as properly funded schools and mental health services. Tech companies like Apple and Google have a three-month window to implement these mandatory device-level filters across the United Kingdom. If these tech firms refuse to comply with the mandate, the government will pass emergency legislation to force them to comply, threatening massive fines and even going after the CEOs of these companies with criminal charges. The technology will work by blocking explicit images directly on the operating system of all smartphones and tablets by default. This system monitors the device camera and third-party apps to intercept nudity before anyone can upload or send the image. Adults can still view explicit content, but only after completing a strict age verification check to unlock their devices. Several bodies like the NSPCC and Barnardo's praised the Home Office's decision, arguing that device-level intervention stops the cycle of grooming before it starts. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also supported the policy, claiming that tech companies can implement on-device checks "without threatening privacy or collecting any data."
    • Did you watch the keynote? It is way beyond what is described in this article. Looks interesting. Now it is time for them to deliver unlike what happened in 24.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      226
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      88
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!