Microsoft responds to Watchdog


Recommended Posts

Microsoft responds to Watchdog

Ellie Gibson 11:00 (GMT) 14/02/2007

Admits there are "isolated reports" of faulty Xbox 360s

Microsoft has responded to claims by the BBC's Watchdog programme that it is charging excessive amounts for Xbox 360 repairs, stating that there is "no systemic issue" with the console.

Last night's episode of the consumer affairs show featured two gamers whose Xbox 360 units had broken after just over a year of use, and were told they would have to pay around GBP 80 to get their consoles fixed.

In an official statement issued to GamesIndustry.biz, Microsoft said that the "vast majority" of Xbox 360 owners have had an "outstanding experience" with the console.

But the platform holder went on to concede: "That being said, we have received a few isolated reports of consoles not working as expected.

"It's important to note that there is no systemic issue with Xbox 360 - each incident is unique and these customer inquiries are being handled on a case-by-case basis."

Microsoft has not revealed details of how many Xbox 360 units have been found faulty, but did state that the return rate is "significantly lower" than the CE industry average of between 3 and 5 per cent.

"Customer satisfaction is our highest priority, and we do everything we can to take care of gamers who may be having problems with their consoles," the company said.

"Anybody having an issue with their Xbox 360 console should call customer service immediately so that we can help. Microsoft voluntarily provides customers with a one year manufacturer's warranty in the UK which operates over and above the legally required retailer warranty for all consumer goods."

Source: GamesIndustry.biz

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538879-microsoft-responds-to-watchdog/
Share on other sites

Isolated reports? Did they print this up from "ourproducthasreliabilityissues.com" or something? Honestly, nothing of substance was said and they are obviously under playing the issue. Even with all the bad press people are scrounging up for the PS3, reliability issues on this scale have not been mentioned.

Isolated reports? Did they print this up from "ourproducthasreliabilityissues.com" or something? Honestly, nothing of substance was said and they are obviously under playing the issue. Even with all the bad press people are scrounging up for the PS3, reliability issues on this scale have not been mentioned.

I agree. "Isolated reports"? lol This is not an isolated problem. I have heard on IGN podcasts that about 80% of people that work at IGN that have had one died and most are on their 3rd 360 :( Mine is also starting to go down the tubes and I just got it in June 2006 :cry: I am glad I bought the extended two year warranty that came with the 360. :yes:

Just a little off topic but when you send in your 360 to Microsoft do you have to send your hard drive with it? :blink:

One thing I would love MS to answer. I doubt they will, but Spartan (or anyone else), if you know of a decent reason, please say lol.

Why the hell do we in the UK have to pay ?80 to get consoles repaired, while in the USA, if you have a launch period console and it goes wrong, MS will repair it for free?

Any real reasons why this is the case? Or is this UK consumers being screwed over again.

They are technically isolated incident when you take total numbers into account.

as they state they are under the 5-3% CE standard. so now lets assume it's 3 percent then just at the level where they can claim that, now 3% of 10 million, that is still a LOT of units. but all in all it's few cases, far fewer than what was expected, and seeing as they said it was less than 5 in the months after release. the fact they have now gone down on the numbers means that the number of failed units are significantly lower since then.

Worst case I suppeose they're actually around 1-2% of failed unit on all those 10 million. and probably below 1% on the ones that are on sale right now. that's still 1-200 thousand units. more than enough to be noticed, but not very many in the big picture.

One thing I would love MS to answer. I doubt they will, but Spartan (or anyone else), if you know of a decent reason, please say lol.

Why the hell do we in the UK have to pay ?80 to get consoles repaired, while in the USA, if you have a launch period console and it goes wrong, MS will repair it for free?

Any real reasons why this is the case? Or is this UK consumers being screwed over again.

Kool Aid is a lot more expensive in the UK and that's why most pay a higher wage to the janitor cleaning toilets over there, which in return, makes our operating cost higher than the rest of the EU??:laugh:gh:rofl:fl:p :p

/me close and hides "SCE Management and Excuses for Dummies"... :shifty:whistle:le:

I'll add my comment from the news item here as well -

So Microsoft provides a one year manufacturer's warranty over and above the legally required retailer warranty.

The legally required retailer warranty in the UK is 12 months replacement on faulty goods so this guy is saying we then get another year return to manufacturer warrant which would extend the UK warranty to 2 years.

Either that or this "platform holder" is talking out of his backside.

Well i've had to send my 360 back twice and that is to many times for me.

Not in my life since the 360 have i had to replace a console.

I can safely say that the 360 has probaley had 1000's of replacements. Especially with that fall update, what a bloody mess that was.

Isolated reports? Did they print this up from "ourproducthasreliabilityissues.com" or something? Honestly, nothing of substance was said and they are obviously under playing the issue. Even with all the bad press people are scrounging up for the PS3, reliability issues on this scale have not been mentioned.

Eh? Tech sites are always going to report these and make them seem way out of proportion to what they really are. I'll conceed to the fact that there were a lot of problems with the launch batch, but they seem to have toned those down extremely.

That being said, I got my 360 on Jan. 2nd, 2006, and I've had 2 problems: It froze up once on the first day - I was excited and set it on some carpeting :pinch: . And I got the red ring of death once - I hadn't plugged in the AV cord.

Again, I'm not saying it doesn't exist based on my experience alone, but in any case, it's probably blown way out of proportion. And at that, what else is MS gonna say, "Our product is faulty, don't buy it." That would be a lie in and of itself. I'd be willing to be most of the 10 million 360 owners aren't having problems. It's far easier to make yourself heard when you have something negative to say. You have to pick one side though. You can take MS's side and say it's under 3-5%, and it's not that much, or you can take everyone else's side (it seems) and say 300,000-500,000 consoles and say it's a huge problem. It's just relative.

-Spenser

We don't really have any official numbers at this point, but if it's under the 3% CE limit or legal limit for goods then it's technically fine. I personally think it's lower then 1%, or 1% at the most, we hear about all these cases because the 360 is a hot topic and well, the websites we read/post on will always bring up every little problem that a user has and posts about.

That's not to say that they don't have problems, but no other console, until the PS3 hit, was as complex as the 360, the more simple the design, like with the older gen, the less hardware issues come up.

We don't hear of PS3s dying but then again, they have, the simple fact Sony only has, at best, 1.4million out in peoples homes means any defects are limited in scale at this point. But there are even youtube vids showing the PS3s blinking red light of death (BRLD). oh, and it even makes a nice beeping noise.

Just to show an example though, I still have my original PS2, from when it first came out, a few months after the original release actually, and it still works fine and everything. Now on the other side, I have a cousin who's on his 4th PS2. And the PS2 isn't anywhere near as complex of a design.

Maybe luck also comes into play, I don't know.

Eh? Tech sites are always going to report these and make them seem way out of proportion to what they really are. I'll conceed to the fact that there were a lot of problems with the launch batch, but they seem to have toned those down extremely.

That being said, I got my 360 on Jan. 2nd, 2006, and I've had 2 problems: It froze up once on the first day - I was excited and set it on some carpeting :pinch: . And I got the red ring of death once - I hadn't plugged in the AV cord.

Again, I'm not saying it doesn't exist based on my experience alone, but in any case, it's probably blown way out of proportion. And at that, what else is MS gonna say, "Our product is faulty, don't buy it." That would be a lie in and of itself. I'd be willing to be most of the 10 million 360 owners aren't having problems. It's far easier to make yourself heard when you have something negative to say. You have to pick one side though. You can take MS's side and say it's under 3-5%, and it's not that much, or you can take everyone else's side (it seems) and say 300,000-500,000 consoles and say it's a huge problem. It's just relative.

-Spenser

The point he made was that the Xbox clearly has reliability issues to a far greater extent than any similar products, because if it happened to Sony, we definitely would have heard about it, but seeing how all the noise is coming from 360 owners, there is definitely an issue. I agree.

Yes, there is a small percentage of people who have been affected, but it is not right for Microsoft to brush them away and claim them as insignificant.

the websites we read/post on will always bring up every little problem that a user has and posts about.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...518690&st=0

They did a poll about it a while back, but if you do a search in this forum you'll notice just how many failure threads there are. :\

I have a feeling that the failure percentage is significantly HIGHER than 3 or 5 percent.

Maybe the 3-5% is only for the UK? Anyways, I'm on my first and xbox, and it's still chugging away :)

Doubt it, with 10 million consoles out and about, you are certain going to be hearing a few stories about problems.

Kool Aid is a lot more expensive in the UK and that's why most pay a higher wage to the janitor cleaning toilets over there, which in return, makes our operating cost higher than the rest of the EU?:laugh:h::rofl:l::p:p

/me close and hides "SCE Management and Excuses for Dummies"...:shifty:y::whistle:e:

Sorry, but, that is complete trash. Operating costs in the UK are normally lower than most of the rest of Western Europe, as most companies base their UK operations in northern England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland as wages and property are much lower. The government also give grants for setting up businesses there - that is why most call centres are based in those regions for example.

Yes, there are higher costs in Europe, but, that's why the price of a 360 is higher to begin with.

If they can afford to provide free replacement in the US, they can afford to do it in Europe.

BTW, whatever happened to this exciting new 360 HDMI info you professed to have?

Yes, there is a small percentage of people who have been affected, but it is not right for Microsoft to brush them away and claim them as insignificant.

And my point is that they aren't saying that that small percentage is insignificant - far from that, actually, as I've heard they've been plenty helpful. What they're trying to point out is that relative to the 10 million 360's out in the wild, it really isn't as great a deal as people are blowing it up to be. Yeah, some consoles have problems, but most of them are fine, and the one's that do have problems, they fix without a fuss.

-Spenser

The fact that some people have had to replace their systems multiple times, whereas other people (like me) who have had no problems from day one seems to indicate that it's an end-user issue rather than a flaw inherent in the Xbox 360. I dunno if those people are morons who cover their systems in dirty clothes and get surprised when it overheats or what, but that's the only explanation as to why some people have had to replace their systems over and over while other people haven't.

And for anyone claimign they think it's siginficiantly higher than 5-3%

Well I'll simplifiy and assume that by siginificantlyyou mean 10% or more.

10% of 10million consoles is 1 millions consoles.

do you REALLY think that1 million failed consoles wouldn't be noticed and that that wouldn't lead to far more than what 240 reports to wtahcdogs about broken consoles ? 1 million or 10% wouldn't be a PR disaster and much more it would be a economic disaster for MS, especially with the extended 1 year warranty.

Luckily my xbox 360 is bought in Norway though (though I currently work in Sweden) so I have at least 2 years covered free of manufacturing faults, and in reality I'm probably covered by the 5 year one. Consumer laws are good :) Not that it seems like I'll ever be needing it.

People were getting charged ?80 because their console was out of the 1 year warranty, and they are surprised that they are getting charged? haha!

That is the real annoyance of the story from point of view. Paying ?80 to have it repaired, whilst our buddies over the pond get it for free.

I don't expect the 360 to constantly die on me, but it is technology. Technology is never 100% reliable or stable. As a proud 360 owner and a wise consumer, I have my 360 set uperfectlyi> to ensure that there is no extrernal influence on the systems performance or stability. If it fails, it's totally hardware. I learnt (the hard way) that you should protect your investments, which is why I'm going to be taking out the 2 year extended warranty plan for ?60. You can't go wrong.

Like somebody already pointed out, I bet that the failure of some of these consoles is down to the owners and their general stupidness. My friends 360 is wedged in between his PS2 and Freeview box. I did warn him.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!