Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better?


Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better? (in single player mode)  

302 members have voted

  1. 1. Bioshock Vs Halo 3 - Wich one is better? (in single Player mode)

    • Bioshock
      156
    • Halo 3 (single player mode)
      146


Recommended Posts

Both games are out now. I bet most of you have played them both. Wich one takes the cake? Bioshock or Halo 3 in single player mode? Why?

EDIT: following the suggestion of some posts I have added "single player mode" to Halo 3 option. It was unfair to compare 2 games in different player modes.

Edited by KaiSerSoze

Well I'm not a huge Halo fan, but I ordered H3, mostly because of the multiplayer.

But Bioshock really didn't impress me, neither with graphics gamepla or the so called story, though I only played the demo, but nothing in the demo intrigued me to want to play the full game.

And Halo 3 got multiplayer.

Bioshock got extreme high Review, but as only Single Player. The game is really good, but it was too short and easy at my taste.

Halo 3 got the mega hyper hype, but I read one review right now and huh... It have a really average score O.o

They says also that the Single player campaign is poor. so...

Anyway, I don't own a X360, I'm just telling what I saw.

Bioshock gets my vote, but then I dislike getting screamed at by angry 12 year old boys saying "ZOMG I so PWNED j00!!one" when they get a lucky headshot.

Multiplayer bores more in most games, and H3 will be no different.

There is rumoured to be expansion packs in the making for Bioshock as well, to extend the storyline.

Bioshock, but Bioshock is a single player game and once you're done, you're done. Halo3 on the other hand has the Multiplayer and Forge crap, so I'm tempted to go for Halo3, but as said above, theres the 12 year old XBLive kiddies which kind of ruin stuff. Think I'll vote with Bioshock, it was *that* good.

Well I have played both and here is my views

Bioshock: The game has a deep feeling with tons of content and an amazing story line. The graphics are amazing and I find the game to be really well done. Since the game has choices to make it makes the game fun to replay and see the different ending.

Halo 3: Continuing with the story line of the Halo games, this game has impressed me too. If you have a nice huge tv and a big sound system I have to say this game is just amazing since you will just sit in some parts to listen.

Coming down to which game is better, neither is better since they both are different in their own way, if I had to pick one, i'd say based on my interests Bioshock wins.

I've only played the BioShock demo, but I can safely say Halo 3 is better. Halo 3 has online multiplayer, and you can customise the maps yourself and share them with your friends! How cool is that?! I might make a racetrack!

I've only played the BioShock demo, but I can safely say Halo 3 is better. Halo 3 has online multiplayer, and you can customise the maps yourself and share them with your friends! How cool is that?! I might make a racetrack!

Yep.. but in Bioshock you can create weapons... not to mention the Plasmids and the Genetic upgrades... awsome!

Is this a serious question, or are you trying deliberately to make Bioshock feel bad? Because I think Halo's gonna win. Just being HALO. And the "3" part.

+1 (Y)

Halo is pretty overrated imo. it's just extremely popular b/c it's an "everyman's game" so to speak. im certainly not saying the franchise is bad by any means, just overrated.

I've only played the BioShock demo, but I can safely say Halo 3 is better. Halo 3 has online multiplayer, and you can customise the maps yourself and share them with your friends! How cool is that?! I might make a racetrack!

yeah and i used to do this w/ Duke Nukem 3D

how can you compare the 2? 1 is single player rpg stylish, the other is a co-op/multiplayer game. halo 3 is great and all, looks good, is fun, but it sort of the same old thing, where as bioshock, with only single player mode, will become the same old thing very shortly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!