[Review] 13" Black MacBook - Santa Rosa chipset


Recommended Posts

I recently reviewed my new MacBook on my blog. I thought that since I have had a lot of good responses about some of my phone reviews from my fellow Neowinians I wrote a few years ago, that I would share this with you. This review is more me being very general towards the audience of my blog, so forgive me if it is not that in depth. If you would rather read the article on my blog, then you can do so by clicking here...

Three weeks have passed since a lovely black MacBook found it?s way into my possession, and now the time has come for me to review it. I mean, you would be disappointed in me if I did not write a small piece on such a lovely specimen of human engineering like this, would you not?

071127(1).jpg

I ordered my MacBook and it?s lovely case on the 2nd November, and it was meant to be delivered on November 5th?but thanks to a **** up from UPS I only received the case. Imagine how depressing it would be just to receive a laptop case and no laptop? Bloody hell it was almost if they where torturing me, the gits! I later found out that the delivery man had left the laptop in the truck as he had not realised the delivery was a consignment of two, just my luck. Anyway, I got it in the end and that is all that matters, and anyway, and they do say absence makes the heart grow fonder?

As you would expect from an Apple product, the packaging was almost as elegant and as beautiful as the actual laptop. I like that about Apple, they take great care in everything about their product and seek to perfect every detail. As you would expect, included in the box where various manuals, software CD?s, a FrontRow remote, various power cables (even they are sexy)?oh, and a MacBook! All of which where beautifully packaged, and a joy to open.

071127(2).jpg

I have never used OS X before. Never ever. Of course, I have seen various screenshots around on the online world, but that is a lot different to actually being familar with the operating system. So what was I to expect when I pressed the power button on my new cold black MacBook for the very first time? I never expected it to blow up, and thankfully it did not. I must say though that booting up into OS X is a lot more pleasant than booting into Windows, everything just worked as it should do but in an efficient and beautiful way. After running through the short and sweet configuration wizard and inputting a few details, I was presented with a whole new world in front of me, an OS X desktop was waiting for me.

I had always believed that OS X was pretty, but as I said before I had only experienced it through screenshots on the internet. My first impressions of OS X is that everything seemed to be perfect, it is hard to describe what I thought. Everything just worked, and it is that beautiful simplicity that I love. There is just something about OS X that you cannot explain.

071127(3).jpg

Don?t get me wrong. I am a big fan of Windows and what Microsoft have done for the industry. Without Microsoft I highly doubt the world would be as it is today, technology plays an important role in evolving society. Without Microsoft I doubt I would even own a blog, and I would not be writing this right now, who knows what I would be doing instead?

A lot of people express their view that OS X is a better operating system than Windows, but I believe each of them to have its own individual strengths, and weaknesses. People enjoy bickering and slagging each other off far to much in this world, don?t get me wrong, I love a good rant (like now!) but I hope I never become blinded and ignorant towards other technologies. I just do not understand the constant hate between ?fanboys?. Some people just do not realise how lucky we are, we are in a great situation where computational rivalry between companies like Microsoft, Apple and Google is only helping to improve technology at an even greater pace.

071127(4).jpg

Anyway, back to my new lovely MacBook. Some of you may remember I was talking about getting one a while ago, but I decided to hold off because there where rumours of Apple updating the MacBook line. Well, I did decide to wait a few weeks and it was worth it because Apple updated the MacBook?s in early November to the Santa Rosa chipset, they also improved clock speeds as well as upgrading the integrated graphics cards.

I have to say, taking a laptop to University is really beneficial to me. My eye sight is not the best, and it makes things a lot easier downloading the notes directly off the University intranet and viewing them on my MacBook in lectures rather than squinting at an over head projector. Also, for some reason in my University there seems to always be a lack of available computers, so now I have the pleasure of studying on my MacBook wherever I want and connecting wirelessly to to the University?s WiFi system without the hassle of searching for a computer. There are countless other advantages of me taking a laptop to University, but it would take to long to list them and I doubt any of my faithful readers (anybody out there??) would be that interested! I do love the fact though that my new MacBook is so small and sexy, and a total joy and ease to carry round!

071127(5).jpg

Now the bad things. I can?t be totally positive can I? I mean, Bill Gates may feel a little bit down hearted when he visits my blog if I do not have one small, minor annoyance with my MacBook. Well anyway Bill, here it is?I hate trackpads! Ok, maybe that is more to do with my incompetence at using them them rather than my beautiful MacBook. I find trackpads to be clumsy, slow and annoying. Because it is a laptop, there is nothing you can do besides buying a mouse and I have done just that, I purchased a ?Microsoft Wireless Notebook Optical Mouse 4000″. I would like to challenge Apple right here and right now to innovate and change the world of computing once more, and create a better inputting device than a trackpad!

Well, even with a very nice education discount MacBook?s do not come cheap. I normally class myself as an orthodox tight arse, but since I bought my desktop I have been on a bit of a spending spree. Although, my spending spree can no longer continue as I really cannot afford to buy anything else now, besides of course four pence tins of beans in some unpopular Scandinavian supermarket that exists in England. So a quick one line summary for those who skipped my drivel and came to the bottom of this post; my MacBook is the best thing since sliced bread and I would like to shag it, now is that wrong?

Just for reference my blog is UnknownLogic.com.

Edited by Martyn

Thank you very much for this review, I was just searching for someone who had reviewed this one :)

EDIT: Think you could extend this review a bit? It doesn't seem to say much. What's the glossy screen like? Good outdoors? What about battery life? Graphics card? :p

nice review, now this might sound strage but before i had used my 1st gen macbook with with apples two finger tap/scroll freatures i didn't like trackpads much at all. now i love using the trackpad, more so than a mouse except for in graphics software. maybe im just one of the crazy ones..

EDIT: Think you could extend this review a bit? It doesn't seem to say much. What's the glossy screen like? Good outdoors? What about battery life? Graphics card? :p

I'll extend it for my fellow Neowinians then! I didn't want to have a massive, massive review because I only did it as a blog post originally!!

The glossy screen is absoloutely awesome, and the image quality is just shockingly good and I was pretty surprised at the quality when I fired the laptop up for the first time. I have not actually played around with my laptop outdoors yet, it is winter and I don't want to get it nicked either.

I was pretty happy with the battery life as well. My old laptop had the battery life of a goldfish though so maybe I am not used to having a good battery in my laptop. Anyway, battery life of course depends on what you are doing with the laptop, but typically I would get around four hours with moderate use...and when I say moderate use I mean programming/reading/browsing the web. I use this utility called CoconutBattery which tells you the health of your battery, and apparently my battery is healthier now than it was when I first got it.

I've not really tried out the graphics card to be honest, I only really use my MacBook for programming and actual University work, so I have not tested any games on it. Although of course, I welcomed the new graphics card that added when the system was recently updated. I suppose one day I could install BootCamp and have a go on Team Fortress 2 to see how it handles it, but I have my desktop for gaming, and I know if I install games on my MacBook then I will end up doing no work on it :p

Any other questions just ask, I know this review was a lot briefer than my normal reviews, so I am sorry about that. But yeah, anything you would like to know...just post in this thead or comment on my blog.

Without Microsoft I doubt I would even own a blog, and I would not be writing this right now, who knows what I would be doing instead?

Technically you would still have your blog because it's hosted on a Linux machine :p

Nice review (Y)

Technically you would still have your blog because it's hosted on a Linux machine :p

Nice review (Y)

Cheers!

The originally point I wanted to get accross to my readers is that Microsoft has done a lot for the world, and inspired a lot of people. Would Linux exist if Microsoft had not been founded?

Cheers!

The originally point I wanted to get accross to my readers is that Microsoft has done a lot for the world, and inspired a lot of people. Would Linux exist if Microsoft had not been founded?

Microsoft didn't have the first OS, so technically yes. :)

:p

The point I meant to try and get accross was that Linux was inspired by Windows, at least partially!

Ummm. No.

Linux was designed to be a Minix clone that worked on the x86 (specifically the 80386 CPU). It was not designed to be a Windows clone. The wine project (and its offshoots) intend on allowing apps written for Windows to run in Linux.

Some UIs resemble Windows to make transitions easier (or if you bounce between a Linux box and a Windows box, I suppose). But I am not big on the Windows "start" button, and use Fluxbox where you right-click on an iconless (ahhh, so clean! ) desktop to initiate most apps. There is a Blackbox UI for Windows, bb4win, I believe that aims to bring Blackbox to Windows platforms. So, inspiration goes both ways (three or more ways, if you count OSX and other OSes).

Thats true. If Microsoft didn't make crappy software, we wouldn't have the amazing Mac OS. :D

And if it wasn't for MS Apple might be out of business!... Might want to look up how they saved Apple around the time Jobs had to come back... Also I don't think OSX had anything to do with MS having windows... it was just the next logical path for a company that bought NeXT and wanted to ditch their legacy Mac OS..

Ummm. No.

Linux was designed to be a Minix clone that worked on the x86 (specifically the 80386 CPU). It was not designed to be a Windows clone. The wine project (and its offshoots) intend on allowing apps written for Windows to run in Linux.

Some UIs resemble Windows to make transitions easier (or if you bounce between a Linux box and a Windows box, I suppose). But I am not big on the Windows "start" button, and use Fluxbox where you right-click on an iconless (ahhh, so clean! ) desktop to initiate most apps. There is a Blackbox UI for Windows, bb4win, I believe that aims to bring Blackbox to Windows platforms. So, inspiration goes both ways (three or more ways, if you count OSX and other OSes).

I am not saying that Linux totally copied and ripped off Windows. What I was trying to get across is that it was inspired by Windows, in my opinion at least. There was a gap on the market for an open source operating system when Windows was popular in the 90's, and Linux filled it very well. Every operating system takes different concepts from their counterparts as you said and Windows has been main stream for a long, long time now and that has to be for a reason. I also think that recently Windows has been taking various design elements from OS X, and I don't really have a problem with that if in the end it improves operating systems.

Just for reference, I am not a particular fanboy of Windows, Linux or OS X. I like them all!

I am not saying that Linux totally copied and ripped off Windows. What I was trying to get across is that it was inspired by Windows, in my opinion at least. There was a gap on the market for an open source operating system when Windows was popular in the 90's, and Linux filled it very well. Every operating system takes different concepts from their counterparts as you said and Windows has been main stream for a long, long time now and that has to be for a reason. I also think that recently Windows has been taking various design elements from OS X, and I don't really have a problem with that if in the end it improves operating systems.

Just for reference, I am not a particular fanboy of Windows, Linux or OS X. I like them all!

Just to make sure, you are aware that X is not Linux and Linux is not X, right? The Linux operating system is basically the Linux kernel, and functionally speaking, a shell by which to access it. Many, many fully-functional Linux systems either do not boot into a GUI by default, or don't even have a GUI installed. A default install of Slackware will see the user booting to a command-line and needing to start X manually (until you add the line to one of those million /etc/rc.init.d.script.02.rc2.init.i.can.never.keep.these/things/straight.forthe/life.of.me files). Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE, Mandriva, and others set up X to boot by default in order to make things easier, but it's not a requirement of the OS where Linux is concerned.

You could argue that Linux was inspired by DOS (and I don't know enough Linux history to say for sure whether it was or not) but to say that the core of Linux - the kernel - was inspired by Windows in any capacity beyond being an operating system is false.

Mac OS was crap. Mac OS X, however, is quite good.

You know, when I got my G4 back in 2001 it shipped with a dual boot configuration - Mac OS 9.2.2 and Mac OS X 10.0.0.4. Though OS X was severely lacking in polish and I had to use OS 9 out of necessity (few apps out at that time for OS X), I have to say that any OS wherein you need to manually assign memory to applications has something seriously wrong with it. OS X on the other hand, while being an extremely memory-hungry beast, has the courtesy to handle allocation for you.

Just to make sure, you are aware that X is not Linux and Linux is not X, right? The Linux operating system is basically the Linux kernel, and functionally speaking, a shell by which to access it. Many, many fully-functional Linux systems either do not boot into a GUI by default, or don't even have a GUI installed. A default install of Slackware will see the user booting to a command-line and needing to start X manually (until you add the line to one of those million /etc/rc.init.d.script.02.rc2.init.i.can.never.keep.these/things/straight.forthe/life.of.me files). Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE, Mandriva, and others set up X to boot by default in order to make things easier, but it's not a requirement of the OS where Linux is concerned.

You could argue that Linux was inspired by DOS (and I don't know enough Linux history to say for sure whether it was or not) but to say that the core of Linux - the kernel - was inspired by Windows in any capacity beyond being an operating system is false.

To be honest I do not know that much about Linux and its inner workings and I am not pretending to either. I am still learning about the deep inner workings of operating systems. When I was comparing Linux to Windows I was just slighting on the fact that the GUI is similar (in my opinion). Thanks for the informative post though :)!

Great review! I know the joy you feel when you sit down in front of your new Mac. I just switched from a PC to a new Macbook on Nov. 30th. I've finally escaped the stone ages. :woot:

OK.. here we go. Windows users are not in the stone ages. We use our operating system for a WIDE plethora of software. That said... go download the Cyrsis demo and get it to run on OS X. What about something small like.... Party Poker? Americas Army? Will that run on OS X? Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142? Can you download and use Trillian? Winamp? Enemy Territory? Do ya see where I'm going with this?

My point is, use your "game lacking" OS. I'll load XP and have fun. I LOVE my games. LOVE THEM! Now... if/when I can run ALL OF MY SOFTWARE on a Mac, I'll probably use that full time. I fear though, when that happens, so will the malware, trojans and viruses. So they'll be no point in switching anyways.....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!