• 0

Best Media/Music Player for Windows 7 x64?


Question

Hello!

I'm currently using Media Player Classic Home Cinema (without any codecs) for any video playback and Winamp v5.61 for music playback.

But I got bored of Winamp, I believe I need a better Music player that can have a better quality playback and as well 5.1 music support for any music file

For the time being I'm good with Media player classic home cinema but I would like to know if there is any better Video player or any codecs you would recommend to increase it's playback quality as well as colors, sharpness and etc.

Please recommend me any players that consider better than Winamp & Media Player Classic Home Cinema including payed and free ones.

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I despise iTunes with a passion. It's dog slow even on my i7, it's just garbage. It feels like an extremely poor port of the Mac version.

I do however use Zune for listening to music, goes great with the Zune HD, and manages music pretty well. For video, I just tend to use Windows Media Player or VLC

  • 0

You must be overreacting.

I've used iTunes for years and I can't remember the last time I had a even a minor issue with it, and I very much doubt it installs 10 services. At the moment the only slow thing about it is the iTunes store.

I have Windows 7 64bit and it is 100% working with my near 60gb library.

He is. I have been using iTunes for years and I have had any minor issues. It doesn't slow down my computer and I have a huge library.

Some of these gripes were valid in older versions, but since iTunes 8/9 a lot of the slowdown issues with large libraries and other things were fixed.

  • 0

I'm not a user who need fancy configs / skins so I use MPC-HC for everything. It's minimal, play audios and it only eat about 3 - 5 mb in minimized mode.

My old combination:

Video: Kmplayer - This one is quite powerful but it's complex, the only thing I want is subtitle draw on the black bar instead of movie screen ( I forget how this is called )

Music: AIMP - minimal and it works. I used to be a foobar lover but somtimes I spend too much time tweaking and playing with foobar but now I don't have that much time so I give up using it :)

  • 0

for Video (.avi or .mkv) = PotPlayer (i.e. http://goo.gl/GFOrM (download links there for x86 and x64)) (formerly The KMPlayer as the developer switched to PotPlayer. it also has hardware accelerated h264 video on by default (The KMPlayer does not which is a big deal for us with older CPU's but with video cards that can do hardware acceleration) which the popular 'VLC Player' does not and it's overall user interface is just better than VLC Player to)

for audio = Foobar2k (plus this program makes it nice and simple to convert formats. say flac to mp3/mpc/ogg(Vorbis)/aac etc (it does require some initial setup though for converting to mp3 etc etc as you need to download the LAME v3.98.4 encoder and then when you try to convert it will ask for the location of the lame.exe. if your going to use OGG Vorbis i would get the Vorbis AoTuV encoder))

p.s. i was a hardcore WinAMP (lite) user for years but with the ways to convert formats and the little things with Foobar2k i think i prefer that overall more but WinAMP still has the edge for compactness.

as for the whole iTunes thing... i never used it but to me it just seems like extra unneeded software as Foobar2k can do all you need. (i prefer DAP's (like Sandisk Sansa e200 series) that can run Rockbox anyways more than the iTunes bs)

plus a nice little side feature with Foobar2k (with a extension) you can run a ABX test (it's basically a test that can compare your original lossless file to a compressed file like MP3 so see if you can tell the difference in sound. it's basically a nice way for a self test that tests your hearing to see when a lossy file becomes transparent to you so you can basically find the sweet spot for making the smallest files for your digital audio player without you being able to tell the difference between the original and the compressed file.

but in general as far as MP3 goes... ill bet most people won't be able to tell the difference between a 130kbps VBR file made with LAME (mode v5 (default is v2 190kbps VBR)) and the original lossless file. (but with MP3 i can definitely detect a difference if you drop back to 96kbps or 64kbps and i proved it using the ABX test (but each person will vary depending on how good or bad your hearing is)) ... but low bit rate encoding (i.e. under 128kbps) i would recommend Vorbis or AAC as those perform clearly better than MP3 does at low bit rates.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
    • Microsoft, totally not confusing /s 25H2 - Current for non-Arm based Windows 26H1 - Current for Arm based Windows 26H2 - Only for non Arm Windows
    • After I installed those, my older but capable Win 11 laptop (16GB RAM) reported it as 26H2 26300.8697. Then I installed it on my big laptop (128GB RAM! Hehe sorry), it reported it as 25H2 26220.8690. Ugh. Do I have to switch Insiders channels from Release to Beta?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!