Does Apple need to introduce Widgets for iOS?


iOS and Widgets  

151 members have voted

  1. 1. Should widgets be added to iOS?

    • Yes!!
      78
    • No!!
      24
    • Don't care, next!
      49


Recommended Posts

Let's face it, Apple users are going to say widgets are unnecessary, and some might say that if Apple does introduce them, they'll do it better and it'll be useful to the people who wants to use them, which of course is not them. and when Apple does make them, they will go all out on how awesome widgets are on iOS :)

I don't know if Apple will add them, but I would suspect they will, they're feeling the competition, and people want easy informative widgets with the information right there. Android has it, WP7 has it built in even better, and in a way that doesn't add battery eating costs. Apple needs to eventually add them to compete. The wall of icons just doesn't work.

I'm not sure if I want or need widgets.

If this does come at WWDC as part of iOS5 it is most likely just something to keep us happy to the iPhone 5 comes out, if it doesn't come out at WWDC.

Guess they come be handy for news apps and the likes of twitter apps, so I don't have to unlock my phone everytime I want to see the latest updates.

They wont call them widgets though, get ready for iWidge. New and revolutionary.

This won't happen, they'll just be called widgets, why? That's what they're called on the Dashboard.

To be honest, they don't need to introduce them, they can if they really want to, but they're not a crucial feature, especially not over a redesigned and improved notification system.

They wont call them widgets though, get ready for iWidge. New and revolutionary.

Other than your poor attempt at trolling, why wouldn't they call them widgets? They already use the term for Dashboard on OS X.

Added a poll to see what the general concensus is around these parts. :)

Ooh, very fancy. Thanks :)

Other than your poor attempt at trolling, why wouldn't they call them widgets? They already use the term for Dashboard on OS X.

It was a joke... no need to get your Apple defence gear on so quickly.

Well, they have built in widgets for OS X, so I would imagine the same thing will make it for iOS. I don't use them in OS X, I find them rather pointless. But I might find myself using them for iOS. Who knows if they will be in iOS 5... the only thing that is more-or-less safe to bet money on is a new notifications system.

I don't think Apple needs widgets in iOS 5 to keep selling i-hardware. I suspect that it is one of the lower features on a persons priority list when spec'ing out a phone... could be wrong though.

One of the main arguments for me to switch to Android a while back was widgets. Turns out I deleted them all after a while. So no, I don't need them. Put them in there, sure, why not, I for myself won't use them though.

I have never really felt like I needed them on my iPad. I honestly have never used it and said to myself more then once "I wish I had a widget" and the one and only thing that made me say that was the weather. Then again I just do not really utilize them on any of my desktops or my Droid phone, minus the weather one on my Droid, so I am just not a big widget user.

I hope they just steal the Android system, the pull down tray is just great. They'll have to call it iNotif though, and remember its magical and revolutionary ;)

Android is not perfect though, everything is pooled together. It can definitely be improved (but Android still is miles better than WP7 or iOS).

Once Mango hits I think then Mango>iOS. The widgets thing is nice, live tiles is good (its a middle ground between widgets and the iOS notifications or at least it feels that way) even though I am not happy about my WP7 I am happy I offloaded my iPhone as I was becoming bored. Think I will get an android next.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!