Recommended Posts

OMG STOP FIGHTING OVER THIS STUFF. Users actually like to see the same comfortable features on different devices. My poor mother takes months to learn how to use a new phone and it's features and then breaks it and then that phone isnt' around anymore so I buy her a new oen and she has to spend months learning new **** cause someone had patented the end call button or some ****.

it's getting ridiculous.

This is really nothing, they both have licensing agreements so patens are not getting in the way( when Apple walked to nearest photocopier :p).

In news of similar interest: Microsoft stole the round waiting indicator from Mac OS X, as well as the triangle when unfolding folders in list view.

In another news of similar interest, Microsoft never claimed that Apple was "photocopying" anything like Apple did ;)

This ###### for tat, who stole what is starting to get trier-some.

It's being going on between technologies for years, cars, TV, DVD players everything.

If one company didn't implement this new innovation their customers would complain and end up moving on.

I really wish people would just except this great time of innovation without calling foul all the time.

True that but let's not forget that Apple has spent significant time at their conference(s) claiming how Microsoft is ripping them off.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

App Store and Pinch to Zoom to name two straight away!

Have you seen Samsung's skin on the Galaxy S? The menu system is basically iOS.

I am not sure if I would give Apple pinch to zoom, there are multiple prior arts to that. AFAIK both Microsoft and Apple either bought or licensed their touch technologies. I don't think App Store was anything special either. Cell phone companies already had stores for phones.

Who cares?

Everybody copies everybody else for everything software. If nobody copied each other, innovation would get nowhere in a hurry.

+1

This is why I never bother writing about Microsoft "stealing" ideas in Windows.

I am not sure if I would give Apple pinch to zoom, there are multiple prior arts to that. AFAIK both Microsoft and Apple either bought or licensed their touch technologies. I don't think App Store was anything special either. Cell phone companies already had stores for phones.

I would seeing as how they have a patent dated from December 2006 for Pinch to Zoom. You may not think the App Store was anything special, but the truth is that it was. I work in the mobile phone industry and until the iPhone 3G came out with the App Store on iOS 2.0, No one gave a damn about it.

Application store's are now critically tied to how well a phone/os will succeed in the marketplace. The general consumers see them as a required function now rather than a nameless feature of 2007.

True enough, Apple didn't invent Apps or 'Application Store' but they made it what it is today, A commercial success and a key selling point of every smartphone currently available. So I would give them that for that sole reason. They also had a hand in touch screens but not the first to do it, but they did refine it.

App Store and Pinch to Zoom to name two straight away!

Pinch to Zoom (and most modern multi touch gestures) were demonstrated by Jeff Han (an NYU researcher) at TED some time before iOS came out (Not sure if he invented them or had been seen before though).

Also, Nokia had an Appstore before (though not as nice as iOS's) and jailbroken iPhones actually had this before Apple implemented it in "regular" phones.

I agree, there's nothing original about iOS 5. However, when the iPhone was first released a lot of companies like Google, HTC, Microsoft, etc. took a lot of ideas from Apple as well all the way down to the square icon design.

Yea, and Apple stole/used a bunch of stuff as well. Whats your point? And square icons have been around on desktop OSs for a long time now...way before the first iPhone. Apple likes to lash out when someone copies them...but apparently it doesnt work both ways.

"you're holding it wrong"

I really do hope Microsoft puts up a poster saying that, sure would be funny.

I'd really prefer they didn't, I liked how they generally took the higher road during Apple's horrible "Get a Mac" campaign.

software concepts should not be patentet and cant be stolen. If its good why not use it.

"Picasso had a saying: 'Good artists copy, great artists steal.' We've always been shameless about stealing great ideas."

samsunggalaxyS_thumb.jpg

TouchWiz was on the home screen, thats the menu system. The similarities to iOS are fairly obvious.

No party is innocent of taking whats out there and adapting it to their OS.

Funny that.. The picture above looks like the menu system my sony ericsson had before the iphone was released. Again, in a grid. I've had numerous phones have the same grid, many before the iphone was even released.

Funny that.. The picture above looks like the menu system my sony ericsson had before the iphone was released. Again, in a grid. I've had numerous phones have the same grid, many before the iphone was even released.

Haha, i was about to say. All SE feature phones have a nice and shiny icon grid :)

Possible, but what makes the iOS 5 announcement so interesting is that these "improvements" are direct rips from other mobile OS's... It isn't taking an idea and running with it, it's taking an idea and directly duplicating it. That is not innovation, and it certainly does nothing for innovation.

And for a company as quick to sue others for even the slightest transgression, I hope Apple does get sued for these rips. Nothing Apple's competition has done was as direct a rip as these improvements that Apple clearly labored over to design... :-\

Considering Google/HTC/Samsung completely ripped off the iPhone handset and iOS, Apple is well within their rights to rip off minor innovations like the Android notification system. If it weren't for the iPhone, Android wouldn't exist. Steve Jobs feels aggrieved.

How come all the Apple haters ignore how much their chosen products borrow from Apple? You are just honked off that Apple did a level set on the playing field and your product of choice and it's tiny smattering of interesting features don't matter again. I'd lol if MS sued Apple, considering just how much they have "borrowed" from Apple over the years.

Haha, i was about to say. All SE feature phones have a nice and shiny icon grid :)

This is true, but getting down to the detail of it, Sony Ericcson's had a 3 x 4 icon grid. iOS has a 4 x 4 grid with a static 4 icon grid at the bottom, look what the Galaxy has. They did that first on a touch screen mobile phone OS.

Every company is guilty of borrowing idea's to further their own operating system! Android, Win 7 and indeed any modern mobile OS have borrowed heavily from what Apple has done with the iPhone. This ISNT a bad thing though.

I think the craziest thing from this is not that anything was "stolen", which is always a funny term seeing as these companies "steal" from each other all the time, but that you can patent something as stupid as swiping to see something else like the last photo taken.

Considering Google/HTC/Samsung completely ripped off the iPhone handset and iOS, Apple is well within their rights to rip off minor innovations like the Android notification system. If it weren't for the iPhone, Android wouldn't exist. Steve Jobs feels aggrieved.

HTC? :p They were doing great things by themselves, creating Touch Flo 3D on the HTC Touch Diamond, which I felt looked so much greater than the iPhone at time. That of course eventually evolved into HTC Sense, but even then it was there own styling, and on Android styled to fit in more with the OS. There's more credit to say Samsung did so, and to a lesser extent Google.

I think there is credit to certain software patents - but ones that require credible complex work. For example, Microsoft Research's customer Kinect skeletal tracking system, I wouldn't mind if they patented that for a bit - a lot of researches spent a LOT of time creating that. Patenting a grid of icons, a swipping unlock button, or something stupid like that... (not that those are actually patented, but just anything in general that's similarly trivial)... then naw, that's not really worth patenting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!