Can I get stable Chromium builds for Windows such as those for Ubuntu?

By MrGaius
in Web Browser Discussion & Support

 Share

Recommended Posts

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
Posted

Hello, while trying Ubuntu (which unfortunately overheated my laptop to the point where I had to uninstall it) I noticed that it receives stable Chromium builds. don'

Does such a thing exist for Windows users? I don't mean repositories but is there anybody online who compiles them once in a while for Windows users?

I don't like the Chrome updater and I really don't like Google products in general but I do think Chromium is the fastest browser I've used so far so if there's any stable Chromium builds out there please link to them here.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Go here, the one on the bottom is the latest, then download mini_installer.exe

It does not auto update so you have to manually download the latest mini_installer.exe if you want to update your browser.

I already know about this, but I'm asking about stable builds. Check this out.

https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/stable

These are stable builds of Chromium made for Ubuntu that match the Chrome builds. Same as Chrome but none of the bloat and completely open-source.

Basically, I want this for Windows..

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

By far the easiest way would be to just suck it up and use "regular" Chrome. I'm not sure why you're so bothered about open-source when you're using Windows...

I'm aware of the inconsistency, but I would just prefer to not use something that puts a running process on my computer at all times just to do updates. I would be surprised if nobody has come out with a stable build of Chromium for anything but Linux considering how many people would prefer it as another truly open source alternative to IE.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Why not just disable GoogleUpdate, or have it run monthly/weekly? Back when I use Chrome, that's what I did since I prefer manually updating my software. I removed GoogleUpdate on task scheduler, etc.

I could do that, but I just prefer not to install it at all.

I'll just wait until somebody starts rolling out Chromium builds themselves, I guess.

What do you use now?

Community Regular

tomjol

Posted
Posted

I'm aware of the inconsistency, but I would just prefer to not use something that puts a running process on my computer at all times just to do updates. I would be surprised if nobody has come out with a stable build of Chromium for anything but Linux considering how many people would prefer it as another truly open source alternative to IE.

I understand that you're trying to stick to a principle, but reality is as it is. Either you can use Chrome, put up with that extra process (which does no harm), and get what you're really after (the browsing experience)...or refuse, and not get anything.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm a Firefox user (typing this using FX Nightly) by default, but use Chromium for some quick browsing (email, school updates, etc).

I tried using Chromium snapshots but they were so crashy it was impossible to use. If only somebody could access the stable branch and compile them from source.

Mentor

Paul Ferson Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

What do you use now?

I use Firefox personally, but to be honest, the unstable Chromium builds are quite stable. I've used a few of them and I've encountered no issues with them, to be honest. I don't use my browser in the same manner some people do, I admit, but I have no real issues to report with Chromium on Windows. There are some extensions on the Chrome Web Store, such as Chromium Updater, so you don't have to manually find the mini_installer.exe file when you want to update. Seeing as Chromium is open-source you could look into more builds of it. I know of both SRWare Iron, and Comodo Secure Browser, though I'm uncertain if they include the little update process or not. I know RockMelt does, so that's it out the window for you.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yep. Very unstable. If you look at the forum for the latest build, I had this same problem when using it yesterday.

I am experiencing extreme slow downs on first open of home page or other sites, once its opened once its fine but its taking up to 10 seconds to initially open a page.

I have tried a complete reboot and have cleared the cache but its still the same.

http://www.srware.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=2471&start=10#p9419

I really don't know why this Iron browser doesn't do what they're doing for Ubuntu...

Mentor

Paul Ferson Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Yep. Very unstable. If you look at the forum for the latest build, I had this same problem when using it yesterday.

Have you tried Comodo's Dragon internet browser? I've never used it but it might be what you want.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Have you tried Comodo's Dragon internet browser? I've never used it but it might be what you want.

Sorry, I should have put this in my original post.

Comodo Dragon has no source code available, has an ugly theme that can't be changed, and has a built-in updater I don't trust. :x

Mentor

Paul Ferson Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Comodo Dragon has no source code available, has an ugly theme that can't be changed, and has a built-in updater I don't trust. :x

ChromePlus? It might be the only fork I can think of at this point apart from RockMelt, which I can already tell you're not big into, due to the process it needs for updating.

Explorer

MrGaius

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ChromePlus? It might be the only fork I can think of at this point apart from RockMelt, which I can already tell you're not big into, due to the process it needs for updating.

Again, neither of these have published their source code, which makes them just as likely as Google to be nefarious.

Funny how all of these companies use something open source and then make them closed source isn't it? :shiftyninja:

Mentor

Paul Ferson Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Again, neither of these have published their source code, which makes them just as likely as Google to be nefarious.

Funny how all of these companies use something open source and then make them closed source isn't it? :shiftyninja:

Haha, you have a point there! Unfortunately, that's my knowledge of Chromium development forks completely used so I have no idea what else to recommend except for Mozilla Firefox, or perhaps the Windows optimized derivative of it known as Pale Moon.

Collaborator

Deo Domuique

Posted
Posted

The guy is asking a simple thing, and some of you suggesting whatever... Why not Chrome, Why not Iron, Why not Comodo... Why not disable this, that... You've certainly to be kidding him.

By the way, nice and interesting question.

Try to follow up on the "Chrome Releases Blog" the version numbers. When they release a build in beta/dev/stable channel, usually on "Chromium Trunk Tree" they update the version number too, the same or next day.

There is an entire build just with updated number version, for example from 794 to 795, like this

http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Win/89588/

It's not so easy process to follow up. But at least you get the point.

The latest numbers right now for example are:

Stable 742.x

Beta 782.x

Dev 792.x

The easiest is to get the latest beta build which probably will be fairly stable and that's because in Chromium's trunk tree you don't see low numbers such as "742". In Chromium tree all versions treated like dev versions.

My main browser is Fx Nightly but also use IE9 and only Chromium. From all Chromium-like browsers, Chromium is undoubtedly the best, no matter what they say. Also the lighter and cleaner. The point is what you're asking... To find a good stable one and stay with. Personally I don't mind to blindy update 2-3 times a week. If I face a serious problem, I wait some time till I get new, with the specific problem fixed.

It's easier than you might think while seeing what complicated message I wrote above.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Rising Star

monkeylove

Posted
Posted

I went to Softpedia, searched for "Chrome," and looked at the version number of the latest Win stable build.

Then, I went to

http://omahaproxy.appspot.com/revision

and entered the version number. After it returned the revision number, I went to

http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Win/

and looked for the revision number closest to the one I got.

  • 1 month later...
Enthusiast

chrisdoland

Posted
Posted

http://chromiumupdater.pcriot.com/

This site has the latest continuous build & snapshot build available in both .exe & .zip for Windows. For noobs: Continuous build is like a "beta" & is stable. Snapshots builds are released almost hourly & are not to be considered stable.

  • 2 months later...
Neowinian

Pierre771

Posted
Posted

Hello

your topic is not recent but it was a very good question

the answer is :

It does not exist !

Why ?

Because Google (which directs the Chromium project) does not want to do it !

Thye want people to use Google Chrome, not Chromium !

Sincerely

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

    • Celebrating Windows XP's 25th anniversary this year

      By carols23 · Posted

      If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By monterxz · Posted

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!