61 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we be forced to use are real names

    • Yes
      44
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

7919ee389c4b0189f429471327c9b563.png

There are a growing number of people that are unhappy about Googles decision to force Google+ users to use their real name rather than a nick name, or even just a first name.

If you choose to stick to your guns, and use your nick, then your profile gets suspended.

Granted, you are given fair warning that this will happen, before you click yes to agree.

Check the help forums for peoples opinion on this

http://www.google.com/intl/en_uk/+/learnmore/forum/

Topic > Profiles

Personally, I'm ****ed about it. DARKFiB3R or FiB3R for short, is the nick I've used for years, at almost 200 sites and services across the net. It is my identity, and I believe I should be allowed to use it.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1011034-google-suspending-profiles/
Share on other sites

Its not a site for your 'online identity'.

Plus, you used it for both your first and last name. You'd probably be able to get away with 'Fib3r [real last name here].

Also, don't forget that there aren't really that many accounts on the service now, so its easy for them to review.

I agree with Simon.. SMELTN has been my nickname for 20+ years as well, but I am comfortable with having to use my real name on G+ just like Facebook.

Honestly it keeps it clean(er) than forums or other sites were you aren't personal. Its just me with some random name and I can talk trash or whatever and have no repercussions, but when you have to use your real name then it becomes more real, and people will make better decisions on their posts and hopefully less trolling.

  • Like 3

Well it is unfortunate in the sense that you can't create a unique username, but yeah I agree that it's much simpler to use your real name. Perhaps later on Google may make it a bit more flexible but for now we're using their product and have to abide by their rules.

I agree, it helps bring up the conversation level a notch. I'd rather having a conversation with "John Doe" than "L33t Ryd3r69" . It already bugs me when my friends change their name on Facebook to something else making it harder to find them. In my phone I have people save by their names, not SexiLexi or some crap like that. You are adults people, let's keep the childish behaviour to the kids. :)

I don't mind it. Its the whole point of social networking, the people you "friend" on there, should be friends from IRL. Its the only way your friends family and old friends could find you.

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

  • Like 1

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

Which is why I dont use facebook, if they find your profile, they can see your photos even if theyre not your friend. With googles "circles" feature, you can limit what people can see, and make it so anyone who isn't in a circle cant see anything from your profile except your name and location.

This feature is the only reason I am back using Social Networking.

Just like in real life, if some old friend finds you and you no longer want to associate with them, you don't. You can't stop someone from trying to find you but you can just ignore them when they do. Then again they can only see what you publish publically. So once again, if you don't want someone to see your balls in public, don't show them in public then!

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

well, on G+ you can make it so you can't be found.. so you could just give your profile to family.. or look up family. Also I am pretty sure you can BLOCK people. Im on the same boat as everyone else here though.. I have 100% no problem using my real name.. the one given to me. As said.. I'd rather socialize with someone I know by a real name, than an online name. Leave the online personas to MSN (Harder now with MS's WLM 2011), Games, and message boards where the point is to stay anonymous.. a social site is the opposite of that.

well, on G+ you can make it so you can't be found.. so you could just give your profile to family.. or look up family. Also I am pretty sure you can BLOCK people. Im on the same boat as everyone else here though.. I have 100% no problem using my real name.. the one given to me. As said.. I'd rather socialize with someone I know by a real name, than an online name. Leave the online personas to MSN (Harder now with MS's WLM 2011), Games, and message boards where the point is to stay anonymous.. a social site is the opposite of that.

I think they're going to delete all non-public profiles by july 31st

Same policy as Facebook. Don't use it if you don't agree.

I won't. But I don't agree with that attitude. There are many pieces of software for instance, where a feature or function was not to my liking. I contacted the dev while continuing to use the software, and in many cases changes were made from my suggestions.

Mightn't suit some alright, though no-one's forcing you to use a service that doesn't wish to allow aliases either.

Really? You really felt the need to tell me that no-one is forcing me? :rolleyes:

Its not a site for your 'online identity'.

Plus, you used it for both your first and last name. You'd probably be able to get away with 'Fib3r [real last name here].

Also, don't forget that there aren't really that many accounts on the service now, so its easy for them to review.

So what is it a site for exactly? It is a social network, and this is my identity.

As StevoFC said, I think it's the 3 that is causing the problem, rather than than the same letters being repeated.

You are right about the lack of accounts at the moment. Will they review it on a per user basis, or will it require a change in policy? We shall see.

I agree with Simon.. SMELTN has been my nickname for 20+ years as well, but I am comfortable with having to use my real name on G+ just like Facebook.

Honestly it keeps it clean(er) than forums or other sites were you aren't personal. Its just me with some random name and I can talk trash or whatever and have no repercussions, but when you have to use your real name then it becomes more real, and people will make better decisions on their posts and hopefully less trolling.

Thank you for being the only person to actually give a reason as to why a real name should be used. Obviously this could still be abused if someone wanted to be a troll, as there is nothing stopping a user from using a fake name.

Well it is unfortunate in the sense that you can't create a unique username, but yeah I agree that it's much simpler to use your real name. Perhaps later on Google may make it a bit more flexible but for now we're using their product and have to abide by their rules.

I hope they do.

Honestly, they would have never noticed if you didnt have the number in the name.

Just get rid of the 3.

Agreed, but the 3 is part of the nick, so it stays, even if I don't. I will have other accounts, so...

Don't be silly. It's an extension of the real you, not your online persona. If you don't like it, don't agree to the terms and conditions.

My on-line persona is an extension of the real me, and it is important to me. I agreed to have my account suspended while it was reviewed. I have made my bed, I will lie in it.

I agree, it helps bring up the conversation level a notch. I'd rather having a conversation with "John Doe" than "L33t Ryd3r69" . It already bugs me when my friends change their name on Facebook to something else making it harder to find them. In my phone I have people save by their names, not SexiLexi or some crap like that. You are adults people, let's keep the childish behaviour to the kids. :)

So the level of conversation I can expect from you here on neowin should be less then if you had used you real name? I don't agree that the use of a nick name/pseudonym is childish behaviour. Read some of the comments posted in the forum linked above to find some more "valid" reasons than my own. Suppose I don't really need to point out that "SHoTTa35" isn't far off "L33t Ryd3r69". Pot, Kettle, Black?

I don't mind it. Its the whole point of social networking, the people you "friend" on there, should be friends from IRL. Its the only way your friends family and old friends could find you.

Why should it be restricted to friends from real life? I have made many, many friends on-line that I have never met in person. I still regard them as "real" friends. Some are better friends than people I have actually met.

Nobody seems to be addressing the poll question (apart from SMELTN), "Should we be forced to use are real names"

If so, why? Baring in mind that there is nothing to stop you using a fake name.

Or should we be allowed the freedom to use the names we have used for years, and that many people only know us by.

  • Like 2

Don't be silly. It's an extension of the real you, not your online persona. If you don't like it, don't agree to the terms and conditions.

I agree. Aliases are fine for forums, for example, but I think only real names should be used on social networking sites such as Facebook and Google+.

Like 10 years ago everyone was told to NOT share a real name online, NOT share a photo online, NOT to talk to strangers and most IMPORTANTLY don't share where you're at or phone numbers. Seems the internet has made a 180 degree change in this dept and all websites are going 'social' now. They want to know WHO you are and WHERE you live. Then they want you to link all your real friends together so they can browse over the content your friends and yourself talk about. They want to know where you shop and they want photos and emails.

  • Like 1

Which is why I dont use facebook, if they find your profile, they can see your photos even if theyre not your friend. With googles "circles" feature, you can limit what people can see, and make it so anyone who isn't in a circle cant see anything from your profile except your name and location.

This feature is the only reason I am back using Social Networking.

Looks like someone doesn't know how to change privacy settings...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • EA launches in-game advertising platform for brands to "connect with audiences" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The gaming giant Electronic Arts is exploring more ways to inject real-life brands into its games. Announced today as EA Advertising, the new platform is attempting to make it easier for brands to reach out for deals with the company and put their products inside titles like EA Sports FC, Madden, NHL, Skate, or The Sims. EA revealed that its EA Sports side of the company brings in "hundreds of millions of players across console, PC, and mobile" every year. Fan engagement of these titles was also touted as being "extraordinary," with 23,000 NFL seasons worth of games being played in Madden NFL daily, while EA Sports FC sees over a billion matches a day. “Players come to EA’s games and live experiences every day to play, watch, create and connect,” said David Tinson, Chief Experiences Officer at Electronic Arts. “That gives brands a meaningful opportunity to show up in ways that add value and respect the player experience, while maintaining authenticity in the worlds our teams are building. With EA Advertising, we’re helping brands become part of those moments in ways that are relevant and built for players.” Using the new program EA Advertising, brands will be able to inject their products into games in real-time via dynamic placement. EA says partners will have access to everything from stadium signage in sports games and targeted adverts to in-game content custom-made for the brands. These are described as additions designed to "enhance, not disrupt" experiences. "In these interactive gameplay environments, brands become part of the game itself, reflecting how players engage with advertising in real-world contexts," adds the company "Brands can activate across live environments, tailoring placements to meet campaign objectives, and update campaigns with ongoing optimization informed by aggregated engagement insights." Current real-world brand partnerships EA has built into its games include Visa (EA Sports FC and College Football), Lowe's (EA Sports FC, Madden NFL, and College Football), Red Bull (EA SPORTS FC), Xfinity and Peacock (EA SPORTS FC), and Mountain Dew’s (College Football).
    • Will be surprised if there isn't a new ver of youtube just for labelled educational content
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels A few months ago, Neowin reported that the UK was trialing a social media ban with 300 teenagers for six weeks, that testing has come to an end, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that the country will ban under-16s from social media. Starmer said that this technology is making children unhappy and making it easier for bullies to harass and abuse them. He continued to talk about the addictive nature of social media, saying that it uses an infinite scroll designed to lock users in for hours. He said this interferes with children doing their homework, reading, playing with friends outside, and going to bed on time. Tackling the idea that nothing can be done about social media, Starmer said: The government’s action won’t stop at social media either, the PM said. It plans to take action on gaming services and livestreaming platforms. Right now, he said, strangers can contact any child unchecked. He said this wouldn’t happen in real life, and the government is going to stop it from happening online, too. The Labour government has overseen the introduction of the Online Safety Act, a big change to the internet which includes age verification on adult websites. This has led to a fair bit of backlash, but overall, the government is pushing ahead with these changes.
    • Still using Hexchat every day but i would not consider it Retro 😛
    • HONOR Robot Phone unveils first Cinematic Video at Shanghai International Film Festival by Steven Parker Global AI device ecosystem company HONOR announced on June 13 that its revolutionary HONOR Robot Phone made its professional imaging debut at the 28th Shanghai International Film Festival (SIFF), demonstrating the result of its mobile videography capabilities for the first time. As the official mobile photography and videography partner of the 28th Shanghai International Film Festival, HONOR empowers this premier cinematic event with cutting-edge mobile imaging technology. Marking the global debut of the first cinematic video it captured, Robot Phone breaks down the boundaries between mobile imaging and professional filmmaking, ushering in a new paradigm for the deep integration of technology and cinematic art. In the video published on HONOR’s official channel (above), Robot Phone was used byELLEMEN to capture cinematic video portraits for the SIFF jury members. With its exceptional stability and cinema-grade imaging capabilities, the device redefines the art of portrait filmmaking, faithfully reproducing the rich tonal gradations and nuanced color transitions associated with film photography. The result is a new level of visual sophistication, creating high-end cinematic imagery that seamlessly blends atmosphere with narrative tension. The video released for the Robot Phone showcases the powerful stabilization capabilities of its built-in gimbal system, delivering exceptionally smooth handheld camera movement while preserving full image quality. By minimizing reliance on electronic image stabilization, the device effectively avoids the image cropping and quality loss typically associated with digital stabilization methods. Representing an innovative leap in form factor, the HONOR Robot Phone features the industry's smallest titanium alloy gimbal, delivering ultra-precision, extreme flexibility, and superior stability. Driven by high-performance motors, the gimbal rises dynamically, breaking free from the physical limitations of traditional camera modules. Combined with advanced AI algorithms that enable intelligent object tracking and various movements with stable shots, the device significantly simplifies video creation and reshapes both the equipment choices and creative habits of modern users. Notably, the Robot Phone will be the first product that features the results of HONOR's strategic technological partnership with ARRI, the world-renowned designer and manufacturer of professional camera technology for cinematic storytelling. From Cannes to Shanghai, the HONOR Robot Phone continues to lead the mobile imaging industry into an entirely new stage of development. Moving forward, HONOR will leverage cutting-edge AI and mobile imaging technologies to unlock new creative possibilities and extend cinematic standards for visual expression from the world of high-end filmmaking to the next generation of content creators. Learn more about the HONOR Robot Phone here: https://www.honor.com/global/events/honor-robot-phone/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      84
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!