61 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we be forced to use are real names

    • Yes
      44
    • No
      17


Recommended Posts

7919ee389c4b0189f429471327c9b563.png

There are a growing number of people that are unhappy about Googles decision to force Google+ users to use their real name rather than a nick name, or even just a first name.

If you choose to stick to your guns, and use your nick, then your profile gets suspended.

Granted, you are given fair warning that this will happen, before you click yes to agree.

Check the help forums for peoples opinion on this

http://www.google.com/intl/en_uk/+/learnmore/forum/

Topic > Profiles

Personally, I'm ****ed about it. DARKFiB3R or FiB3R for short, is the nick I've used for years, at almost 200 sites and services across the net. It is my identity, and I believe I should be allowed to use it.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1011034-google-suspending-profiles/
Share on other sites

Its not a site for your 'online identity'.

Plus, you used it for both your first and last name. You'd probably be able to get away with 'Fib3r [real last name here].

Also, don't forget that there aren't really that many accounts on the service now, so its easy for them to review.

I agree with Simon.. SMELTN has been my nickname for 20+ years as well, but I am comfortable with having to use my real name on G+ just like Facebook.

Honestly it keeps it clean(er) than forums or other sites were you aren't personal. Its just me with some random name and I can talk trash or whatever and have no repercussions, but when you have to use your real name then it becomes more real, and people will make better decisions on their posts and hopefully less trolling.

  • Like 3

Well it is unfortunate in the sense that you can't create a unique username, but yeah I agree that it's much simpler to use your real name. Perhaps later on Google may make it a bit more flexible but for now we're using their product and have to abide by their rules.

I agree, it helps bring up the conversation level a notch. I'd rather having a conversation with "John Doe" than "L33t Ryd3r69" . It already bugs me when my friends change their name on Facebook to something else making it harder to find them. In my phone I have people save by their names, not SexiLexi or some crap like that. You are adults people, let's keep the childish behaviour to the kids. :)

I don't mind it. Its the whole point of social networking, the people you "friend" on there, should be friends from IRL. Its the only way your friends family and old friends could find you.

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

  • Like 1

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

Which is why I dont use facebook, if they find your profile, they can see your photos even if theyre not your friend. With googles "circles" feature, you can limit what people can see, and make it so anyone who isn't in a circle cant see anything from your profile except your name and location.

This feature is the only reason I am back using Social Networking.

Just like in real life, if some old friend finds you and you no longer want to associate with them, you don't. You can't stop someone from trying to find you but you can just ignore them when they do. Then again they can only see what you publish publically. So once again, if you don't want someone to see your balls in public, don't show them in public then!

What about people who you used to know, who would search for your real name, that you no longer want to have any contact with ?

Close family and friends would know your alias - but the others wouldn't unless you wanted them to.

well, on G+ you can make it so you can't be found.. so you could just give your profile to family.. or look up family. Also I am pretty sure you can BLOCK people. Im on the same boat as everyone else here though.. I have 100% no problem using my real name.. the one given to me. As said.. I'd rather socialize with someone I know by a real name, than an online name. Leave the online personas to MSN (Harder now with MS's WLM 2011), Games, and message boards where the point is to stay anonymous.. a social site is the opposite of that.

well, on G+ you can make it so you can't be found.. so you could just give your profile to family.. or look up family. Also I am pretty sure you can BLOCK people. Im on the same boat as everyone else here though.. I have 100% no problem using my real name.. the one given to me. As said.. I'd rather socialize with someone I know by a real name, than an online name. Leave the online personas to MSN (Harder now with MS's WLM 2011), Games, and message boards where the point is to stay anonymous.. a social site is the opposite of that.

I think they're going to delete all non-public profiles by july 31st

Same policy as Facebook. Don't use it if you don't agree.

I won't. But I don't agree with that attitude. There are many pieces of software for instance, where a feature or function was not to my liking. I contacted the dev while continuing to use the software, and in many cases changes were made from my suggestions.

Mightn't suit some alright, though no-one's forcing you to use a service that doesn't wish to allow aliases either.

Really? You really felt the need to tell me that no-one is forcing me? :rolleyes:

Its not a site for your 'online identity'.

Plus, you used it for both your first and last name. You'd probably be able to get away with 'Fib3r [real last name here].

Also, don't forget that there aren't really that many accounts on the service now, so its easy for them to review.

So what is it a site for exactly? It is a social network, and this is my identity.

As StevoFC said, I think it's the 3 that is causing the problem, rather than than the same letters being repeated.

You are right about the lack of accounts at the moment. Will they review it on a per user basis, or will it require a change in policy? We shall see.

I agree with Simon.. SMELTN has been my nickname for 20+ years as well, but I am comfortable with having to use my real name on G+ just like Facebook.

Honestly it keeps it clean(er) than forums or other sites were you aren't personal. Its just me with some random name and I can talk trash or whatever and have no repercussions, but when you have to use your real name then it becomes more real, and people will make better decisions on their posts and hopefully less trolling.

Thank you for being the only person to actually give a reason as to why a real name should be used. Obviously this could still be abused if someone wanted to be a troll, as there is nothing stopping a user from using a fake name.

Well it is unfortunate in the sense that you can't create a unique username, but yeah I agree that it's much simpler to use your real name. Perhaps later on Google may make it a bit more flexible but for now we're using their product and have to abide by their rules.

I hope they do.

Honestly, they would have never noticed if you didnt have the number in the name.

Just get rid of the 3.

Agreed, but the 3 is part of the nick, so it stays, even if I don't. I will have other accounts, so...

Don't be silly. It's an extension of the real you, not your online persona. If you don't like it, don't agree to the terms and conditions.

My on-line persona is an extension of the real me, and it is important to me. I agreed to have my account suspended while it was reviewed. I have made my bed, I will lie in it.

I agree, it helps bring up the conversation level a notch. I'd rather having a conversation with "John Doe" than "L33t Ryd3r69" . It already bugs me when my friends change their name on Facebook to something else making it harder to find them. In my phone I have people save by their names, not SexiLexi or some crap like that. You are adults people, let's keep the childish behaviour to the kids. :)

So the level of conversation I can expect from you here on neowin should be less then if you had used you real name? I don't agree that the use of a nick name/pseudonym is childish behaviour. Read some of the comments posted in the forum linked above to find some more "valid" reasons than my own. Suppose I don't really need to point out that "SHoTTa35" isn't far off "L33t Ryd3r69". Pot, Kettle, Black?

I don't mind it. Its the whole point of social networking, the people you "friend" on there, should be friends from IRL. Its the only way your friends family and old friends could find you.

Why should it be restricted to friends from real life? I have made many, many friends on-line that I have never met in person. I still regard them as "real" friends. Some are better friends than people I have actually met.

Nobody seems to be addressing the poll question (apart from SMELTN), "Should we be forced to use are real names"

If so, why? Baring in mind that there is nothing to stop you using a fake name.

Or should we be allowed the freedom to use the names we have used for years, and that many people only know us by.

  • Like 2

Don't be silly. It's an extension of the real you, not your online persona. If you don't like it, don't agree to the terms and conditions.

I agree. Aliases are fine for forums, for example, but I think only real names should be used on social networking sites such as Facebook and Google+.

Like 10 years ago everyone was told to NOT share a real name online, NOT share a photo online, NOT to talk to strangers and most IMPORTANTLY don't share where you're at or phone numbers. Seems the internet has made a 180 degree change in this dept and all websites are going 'social' now. They want to know WHO you are and WHERE you live. Then they want you to link all your real friends together so they can browse over the content your friends and yourself talk about. They want to know where you shop and they want photos and emails.

  • Like 1

Which is why I dont use facebook, if they find your profile, they can see your photos even if theyre not your friend. With googles "circles" feature, you can limit what people can see, and make it so anyone who isn't in a circle cant see anything from your profile except your name and location.

This feature is the only reason I am back using Social Networking.

Looks like someone doesn't know how to change privacy settings...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I remember when all games had demos; it was a normal thing, not a limited time promotion.
    • Forza Horizon 6 gets big bug-fixing and balancing update by Taras Buria Today, Playground Games released a big Forza Horizon 6 update with a long list of fixes, patches, and balancing tweaks that the studio promised earlier. Version 375.327 is now available on Steam, Microsoft Store, and Xbox, offering users improvements for AI, audio, design, performance, road discovery, upgrades, visuals, online play, and more. Some of the most notable changes in the Series 2 update include rebalanced drivatars, particularly their difficulty and race start behavior. As such, the game should be more balanced on higher difficulty levels, and AI cars should not shoot out when the race starts as if they have rocket boosters. Speaking of difficulty, developers nerfed Drag Tires physics for a more expected and realistic behavior. They are no longer the go-to option for record-breaking times in road racing, and all leaderboard entries with drag tires will be removed. Completionists will also be glad to get a new feature that lets you see road discovery percentage in each region, which should make discovering all roads easier while keeping it quite challenging and interesting (I spent quite a long time finding the last road). Festival Playlist is also getting some much-needed fixes, including patches for bugs that allowed completing Seasonal Jobs ahead of time or where weekly challenges would not unlock for some players. Developers will retroactively give reward points to all who could not complete all challenges due to these bugs. Other changes include changes to Horizon Play progression so that it is easier to reach Level 100, audio improvements on lower-spec devices, fixes for visual glitches, including pixelated smoke, and more. Developers also addressed the currently non-working Eliminator, an online mode gamers used to farm credits with a Hummer EV exploit. Playground Games plans to re-enable it soon. As a gesture of goodwill, players will get a free McLaren Sabre. Those who used the exploit will not be banned, but developers plan to roll back credits to a maximum of 10M for all who farmed credits using the exploit. You can find the complete changelog for the latest Forza Horizon 6 update here.
    • "Samsung is shutting down yet another app used by millions" I will fix the clickbait title for you, free-of-charge: "Samsung shutting down it's Max VPN app"
    • Microsoft brings Planner Agent to all Microsoft 365 Copilot users by Ivan Jenic Image: Microsoft Microsoft has announced that Planner Agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot is now generally available to all users with a Microsoft 365 Copilot license. Planner Agent is the latest addition in the string of AI features that Microsoft is implementing across virtually all of its products. The agent lets you manage tasks through natural language prompts directly inside Microsoft 365 Copilot. You can create and update tasks, check priorities, and get insights about current entries without leaving the chat interface. The general availability release comes with a handful of new additions on top of what was available during the initial rollout. A new plan picker lets you search and filter your plans by name, then update task names, statuses, due dates, or priorities through the agent. There's also a goals bucket now, which lets you group tasks under specific goals. This builds on the Goals view, a feature that was introduced as part of the broader Planner refresh that rolled out earlier. Image: Microsoft | Planner Agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot All AI-generated plans and tasks are created in draft mode by default, so you can review and approve changes before anything goes through. This is actually a thoughtful safety feature, because trusting AI to handle all your tasks without a human in the loop is usually a recipe for disaster. Having tasks initially saved as drafts is the best possible middle ground. Microsoft also says that not all tasks are executed equally. Simple tasks get processed quickly, while more complex ones, like building a plan from a Word, Excel, or PowerPoint file, are handed to a more capable model. Microsoft says this approach delivers the best performance, but it could also help with usage management, as you won't have to waste tokens on performing simple tasks. Planner Agent is available now across Teams, Loop, SharePoint, and other Microsoft 365 apps for anyone on a Microsoft 365 Copilot subscription.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!