How can I find out what is using all of my upload bandwidth?


Recommended Posts

Something is randomly using all of my upload bandwidth, which makes my connection crawl.

I do not have spyware, adware or a virus.

How can I find out what process is doing this?

EDIT: This only started happening after I installed NetBalancer. However, it was uninstalled hours ago and I have rebooted, so I'm unsure how it can even be related.

Windows 7 x64 SP1.

EDIT: I rang Sky Broadband, they said it was an issue at the local hub and that it will be fixed within 30 minutes. I read a book for an hour, came back and the connection is now all good. Sorry, guys! Just seemed a massive co-incidence.

Look at the Task manager -- ctrl-alt-delete.

What processes are running ?

Also it may be a rootkit, and something has made your PC a zombie.

Do a rootkit scan.

http://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/free-tools/sophos-anti-rootkit.aspx

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:14, Hum said:

Look at the Task manager -- ctrl-alt-delete.

What processes are running ?

Also it may be a rootkit, and something has made your PC a zombie.

Do a rootkit scan.

http://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/free-tools/sophos-anti-rootkit.aspx

I have no rootkits. Only novices get rootkits, spyware, adware or virus'.

This only started happening after I installed NetBalancer. However, it was uninstalled hours ago and I have rebooted, so I'm unsure how it can even be related.

Maybe I should call Sky Broadband, it could be an issue on their end (i.e. a co-incidence).

  Quote
I have no rootkits. Only novices get rootkits, spyware, adware or virus'.

Well, you claim not to be a novice but can't even track your usage?

Check for rootkits and drop the superiority complex. If you can't rule it out (and opinion rules nothing out) then it still exists.

  • Like 2
  On 24/07/2011 at 13:24, njlouch said:

Well, you claim not to be a novice but can't even track your usage?

Check for rootkits and drop the attitude.

There is no attitude. It's very true. Just because I find it very easy to avoid getting rootkits, spyware, adware or viruses, it doesn't mean I know what software you guys recommend to discover what processes are using my bandwidth. I know that NetLimter can tell me what processes are using my bandwidth but in case that program is calling this issue, I am of course reluctant to re-install it.

The reason I know it's not a rootkit is because I doubt very much it's a co-incidence that NetLimiter was installed/uninstalled an hour before this issue occurred.

For ****s and giggles, I'll run Sophos Anti-Rootkit.

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:29, Detection said:

I think the clue is in the name "NetLimter "

Sounds like it has left something behind after the uninstall

That is not logical. The program was used to stop Firefox using all of my 130 KB/s upload bandwidth. I used it to limit Firefox to using a maximum of 95 KB/s in upload bandwidth. I then uninstalled it as, even though it worked, I decided just to go ahead and let Firefox do what it wishes.

So why would that program, installed or not, be doing this to my connection...?

EDIT: Sophos Anti-Rootkit found nothing suspicious. As expected.

As it is designed to limit bandwidth, your issue is bandwidth related, and it started around the time you installed and uninstalled this program I would say its more likely to be that than a coincidence.

I vaguely remember installing something similar if not the same program a while ago and completely losing my connection, programs like this install drivers I think, check hidden items in the device manager / services running in services.msc etc

If it all fails, as posted above, system restore to before the issue

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:36, Detection said:

As it is designed to limit bandwidth, your issue is bandwidth related, and it started around the time you installed and uninstalled this program I would say its more likely to be that than a coincidence.

I vaguely remember installing something similar if not the same program a while ago and completely losing my connection, programs like this install drivers I think, check hidden items in the device manager / services running in services.msc etc

If it all fails, as posted above, system restore to before the issue

It does install a service but from what I can tell, there appears to be no related services on my computer :/

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:36, _DP said:

Do you get the same issue with other browsers?

This is happening system-wide. For example, I can be playing a game fine then a few seconds later, I get 900 ping before getting kicked. It's then that I realize something was uploading using all of my 130 KB/s upload speed. I am using Rainmeter to find my current system down/up speeds.

If your looking to track what process is using upload, you could run tcpview http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897437

You could run wireshark as well - great FREE protocol analyzer http://www.wireshark.org/ to see what is actually being put on the wire, etc. but what show you what process did it, just what is being done.

Or you could put netlimiter back on ;) It shows you what is using bandwidth heeheheh

I rang Sky Broadband, they said it was an issue at the local hub and that it will be fixed within 30 minutes. I read a book for an hour, came back and the connection is now all good. Sorry, guys! Just seemed a massive co-incidence.

I wasn't trying to be douchey earlier when I said it's not difficult to avoid getting rootkits, spyware, adware or viruses, it just really is easy to avoid them in my opinion :s Stick to legitimate websites, check comments when downloading torrents, keep your Windows and MSE up-to-date, don't start using dodgy Facebook apps etc. and you will be fine!

"all of my 130 KB/s upload speed. I am using Rainmeter to find my current system down/up speeds. "

Um how is your box uploading an issue at the local hub?

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:45, BudMan said:

"all of my 130 KB/s upload speed. I am using Rainmeter to find my current system down/up speeds. "

Um how is your box uploading an issue at the local hub?

I am not sure. The ping issues were due to an problem at the local LLU according to Sky Broadband and when they said it would be fixed in about 30 minutes, they were right!

Sounds like a common sense solution.. the program you installed which was "NetBalancer" has screwed with Winsock... you need to reset this.

Open up command prompt.... and type the following just as I've put it spaces and all:

netsh winsock reset catalog - Hit Enter

netsh int ip reset reset.log hit - Hit Enter

Now Reboot and test again.

Even if you think your problem is solved don't put that junk netbalancer back on there..its nothing but a sandbox and useless...control your bandwidth or monitor it using your router. Run these reset lines to get Windows7 winsock stacks back to default the way its supposed to be if anything did in fact alter it.

  On 24/07/2011 at 13:24, njlouch said:

Well, you claim not to be a novice but can't even track your usage?

Check for rootkits and drop the superiority complex. If you can't rule it out (and opinion rules nothing out) then it still exists.

Actually with most home routers it's not that easy to get per device bandwidth usage data.

Even the ones that allow collecting the data via something like SNMP usually only go down to the port level, which is no good in the case of wireless or if there's a switch further upstream of that port.

"I am not sure. The ping issues were due to an problem at the local LLU"

And are you still seeing an upload of 130 when your not doing anything?

And I agree with xbamaris the resource monitor in w7 is perfect tool for looking this up, not sure why I forgot it other than just habit from older windows versions not having the ability to look at this. But yes that is the best suggestion for looking to see what is uploading.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Elon Musk doesn't want you to know Tesla's response to the NHTSA's Robotaxi questions by David Uzondu Recently, Tesla's Robotaxi service began operating in Austin, and almost immediately, the company decided it would prefer you didn't see its homework. Before the launch, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) sent Tesla a letter with a deadline of June 19th to answer some questions. Now that Tesla has replied, it has requested that the NHTSA withhold the entire response from the public, classifying it as confidential business information. This isn't too surprising, as the company is notoriously secretive about its performance data, especially in areas like Autopilot and Full Self-Driving. Here are a few paraphrased versions of the questions Tesla faced: How will the system handle bad weather or poor visibility? What happens if the system detects that it cannot drive safely? Does it pull over? Will a human be monitoring the cars remotely or in person? Does the system follow any existing industry standards for autonomous driving? When does Tesla plan to let other people operate their own cars as robotaxis? The feds have good reason to ask. On its first day, Tesla's Robotaxi service was caught on video making some questionable moves, including driving in the wrong lane against traffic, as seen below (full video here). The clip was also shared in our community forums, though you'll need a free membership to access the off-topic section. Here's another showing a Robotaxi dropping passengers in the middle of an intersection. For now, the service runs with a human safety driver (likely a Tesla employee) in the passenger seat. Billionaire Dan O'Dowd, a persistent critic of Tesla's software, felt the company's launch was lackluster, and the videos circulating online demonstrate that the technology is years behind competitors like Waymo, which has operated without in-car supervisors since 2019. For its part, NHTSA acknowledged being aware of the widely reported incidents and is in contact with Tesla to get more information. The agency's statement reminded the public that manufacturers self-certify their vehicles' safety, and NHTSA's role is to investigate and act on safety problems after they are on the road: This situation gets even more interesting when you look at the bigger picture. Musk has already been criticized for his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has led to job cuts at agencies that oversee his companies, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for SpaceX, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Neuralink, and, of course, NHTSA. This has led some to worry about regulatory capture. As one cynical comment on Electrek's article notes, the official who signed the letter to Tesla, Tanya Topka, Director of NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation, may have put a target on her back just for trying to hold the company accountable.
    • Have you ever developed a game for Xbox and Windows at the same time? To say that they are not the same operating system and the same DirecTx by chance?? It's obvious that it isn't, right? So what if Xbox uses HyperV? What difference does that make to a game developer? The PS4 is more different than the PS5, different operating systems and different APIs. The games are not backwards compatible However, a game made in Windows can be transferred to Xbox SX in a few weeks with little programming costs because they are the same API and the same Windows
    • Idiot, FH5 sold more on Xbox and Windows than on PS5. You tell lies like that and think no one will check, right? There are a lot of FIFA and CoD hacks on PS4 and PS5 being used every day and Sony doesn't do anything. You can also buy a game's Platinum achievement without having bought the game and Sony doesn't do anything.
    • $80 a game? What do I get for it? A broken game on release, with needs GBs of storage for patches. Still going to put up with micro purchasing? Still need internet to play the game? yep. I could go on, point is...you're paying more but not getting more than what is already being offered by competitors (at a lower price).
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Ainajohn earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      sophiaisabella32 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      Brett76 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      592
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      223
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      173
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      146
    5. 5
      Xenon
      134
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!