intel = pwned


Recommended Posts

http://www.chaosmint.com/benchmarks/powermac-g5-ps7bench/

Ok, have enough proof the G5's are the fastest? Enough of these crappy theoretical benchmarks that just see how fast the thing does a certain processor call. This is the G5 running a *real* application and kicking ass.

Also from this thread: http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/p...31&m=1150967585

2x 2000 G5 OSX 10.2.7 (G5 plugin)                  547 (energy settings highest perf)

2x 3060 Xeon (OC'd 2400)                                488

2x 2930 Xeon (OC'd 2400)                                471

    3200 P4 (800MHz)                                        427

    3000 P4 (800MHz)                                        405

    3495 P4 (OC'd 3.06)                                    386

    3060 P4 XP Pro (533 FSB)                            358 HT

As you can see, even the fastest, OC'ed P4s aren't as fast. I'm getting me a dualie for sure now :)

Flame suit: On!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/
Share on other sites

I'm a PC user and knwo what I think? WHo cares?

I used to run Avid XPress on my $3000 Mac that I needed to upgrade spending another $3000 every couple of years.

Now I run Avid XPress on my $1000 PC that I need to upgrade every couple of years spending another $600-$1000 max.

Both did what I needed it to do. Both work great. One allows me to play games too. One saves me a couple of grand every couple of years.

I don't think its a question of whats "BEST", its whats "BEST FOR YOU". If I ran a studio and had unlimited funds I'd probably have some G5's too just for cool factor.

In my last office setting I had one dual G4 and one P4. I used the G4 to edit and the P4 to number crunch (compress video) as the Software on the P4 was much faster. Batch COnverter from Sonic Foundry on my PC ran 10x faster than Media Cleaner 5 for Mac even if the mac was "faster".

Why do Mac's and PC's always have to be hating? Can't we all jsut get along...?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171746
Share on other sites

considering how close the benchmarks are its only going to take intel a few months to get back on top. intel releases new chips a lot faster then apple does.

The G5 will be at 3.0 Ghz by summer '04. That would be equivalent to a 4.5Ghz P4 by that time, which is not exactly likely (though possible, I'm sure).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171789
Share on other sites

i've said it before i'll say it again, where are the opterons??? if extremetech and other review sites can get opterons for review purposes, then there has to be opteron based systems out there.

Opterons are server-based, so design firms and home users aren't generally going to buy them, nor pay the prices to get one.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171791
Share on other sites

considering how close the benchmarks are its only going to take intel a few months to get back on top. intel releases new chips a lot faster then apple does.

can you read?

apple = 547

p4 3.2ghz = 427

p4 3ghz = 405

assuming intel gains 20 points for every 200mhz, they would need a what, 4.4ghz p4?

yes, the xeons are different, but the same deal as the opterons... xeons are mostly server chips.

some people run xeon's in their home pc, but... not often. and no company like hp or whoever put them in their pc's. just their servers.

and i had to laugh at "how fair is that?? dual g5 against single p4?"

there are dual xeon scores on there too. and nobody i know makes a dual p4 mobo.

and haha at bush0113. haha.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171892
Share on other sites

Opterons are server-based, so design firms and home users aren't generally going to buy them, nor pay the prices to get one.

opterons are also in workstations. and i think it's fair to say the g5 is a workstation cpu. and considering the first athlon64 which are targeted toward the consumer are rumored to essentially be rebadge opteron chips, it would be fair to compare the opteron to the g5, and to the a64 etc...

the opteron was designed to be a competitor of the xeon chip, so if you're buying a xeon based system, i'd wager they would/could get a opteron based system that suits their needs just as good or better in some cases than the xeon.

on average the opteron is cheaper than the xeon, though more expensive in some cases. and as we know thanks to Mac users price is not really all that important ;). as long as dual opteron based systems are near the same price as dual g5/xeon systems then price is not part of the equation.

frankly we all know that the p4 chip is not really that efficient, while the g5 is a very efficient chip. considering a opteron 244 clocked a 2.0 ghz can beat a 3.2ghz p4 with a 1200 mhz clock speed advantage in many benchmarks, it's fair to say that the opteron is a much better challenge if you will to the g5. however IMO i don't think Apple PR wants those benchmarks to be released. let the g5 use the g5 photoship plugin and let an opteron use an opteron plugin (design one if it doesn't exist) and then we could truly see which chip/system is the superior.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171914
Share on other sites

These may be legit, but I think they are irrelevant. Software and style draws people to the Mac, not speed. The fact that people will buy an 800MHz iBook or Powerbook over a 2.66GHz PC Laptop just proves it. Sure the G5 is a beautiful machine but again we see apple aiming for the small user base - smart, usually computer-literate people, with money to burn.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171922
Share on other sites

These may be legit, but I think they are irrelevant. Software and style draws people to the Mac, not speed. The fact that people will buy an 800MHz iBook or Powerbook over a 2.66GHz PC Laptop just proves it. Sure the G5 is a beautiful machine but again we see apple aiming for the small user base - smart, usually computer-literate people, with money to burn.

Very true. My iBook is 900Mhz, but I don't feel it becuase the OS and software are built in a different way, and the applications I run on it don't ever show any slowdown to me. Sure, I could scroll safari faster and do other things, but that's why i'm getting the dual 2.0 anyways :)

You've also gotta remember that by having higher clocks on their processors, Intel's going to be hitting physical barriers faster than AMD or IBM. AMD probably has the most reasonable follow-up to the G5, but it's a server chip for now and it'll be a while until we see it. So, for now at least, the dual 2.0 rules the photoshop world.

I'm still waiting on some UT2003 benchmarks or something, too :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1171958
Share on other sites

Opteron are made for the workstation too, yes, but in certain benchmarks optimized for Intel chips the Xeon will still outrun it. Also, opterons are probably 2x more if you want the same power of the G5. Also, AGP is a very rare feature included on Opteron boards with the exception of a few (Asus SK8N for one) and AGP does not work very well either and lots of times the video drivers will not even detect an AGP card even when one exists.For this reason, the Opteron is not suitable in workstations as say a G5.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1172290
Share on other sites

Can most home users afford a $3000+ computer???

If you save a little bit each month affording one should be no problem. Do you think we all buy it all $3,000 at once?

I don't think the iMacs and iBooks/Powerbooks are that overpriced either. Maybe the G5 but they still rock.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1172294
Share on other sites

The P4 extreme will be the first smack and will greatly increase the CPU's performance... then comes Prescott, keeping the Cache boost and adding so much more to the 'puter.

But I would like to say... why can't we all get along?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/101657-intel-pwned/#findComment-1172307
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!